
Originally Posted by
leskey
You raise some very interesting topics, RP.
I was diagnosed with PTSD several years ago. While, PTSD has been the plight of many returned servicemen for generations, it has also been an affliction of those individuals who have survived physical and psychological traumas and abuses. I am fully aware of that. Though not a clinician, I work with them, and, I deal with civilian PTSD cases, routinely.
PTSD's classification, was the result of the efforts of an organized group of Vietnam War veterans. These war vets had not only experienced physically threatening and traumatic circumstances, they were also subjected to the additional psychological trauma of the politico-social conflicts of the era - they were the scapegoats...they were not lauded as heros. The societies they returned to, at least initially, did not allow them to forget. I am fully aware of that.
IMO, the diagnosis of PTSD has only served to identify the impotent status of victimhood - the need to have an individual's, or group's, suffering recognised by the government and, by default the society, which entertained the circumstances of the trauma. There are many ersatz, freelance PTSD students who agree with you. This does not lead to liberation, if it becomes the tool to justify one's right to become part of any state-funded benefit system. The legitimate system callls such individuals, 'malingerers'. It becomes the condonable behaviour attributed to on-going regret and grief. This is called 'malingering' - the Bureau of Vets Affairs deals with them routinely.
While there are varying degrees of stress in all traumatic circumstances, the consequences of the experience are defined by the psychological strength, mental acuity and emotional intellect of the individual. Very well.
I disagree that this state of being cannot be overcome...that's not to say it can ever be totally forgotten and that it may not have significant on-going consequences in an individual's life, especially if they're forced to live with debitilitating physical consequences. However, despite the consequences, the circumstances were due to the alignment of certain effects in a relatively short window of time. It is not a disorder, unless it is allowed to expand beyond it's original context. When the stressors are keenly consequential, the world is abundant with 'triggers' - and the afflicted are 'forced to live with it'. Some of them are endemic, whereas part of the severe PTSD experience is the continuous discovery of synapsis stimulants and ganglionic avenues you had previously blocked out. A pleasant or every day experience can be a 'trigger', because it is memorably stored alongside a contrasting catastrophic experience that abruptly intruded upon it. For some, 'normality' is a mine field of triggers, that are unexpectedly encountered in the most mundane circumstances and settings. Agorophobia and bi polar symptoms emerge here - also in other segments of Disorder Symptoms Manuals.
Rather than a life of denial, it's constructive for the individual to personally acknowledge and accept the veracity of events and their consequences, in order that the effects can, rather, become a catalyst for postiive change. Like alcoholism, stress can become a drug...a way of life...it can only be kicked if and when the addict decides it's time. In cases of anxiety and panic attack, the endocrinal pot boils over with the ingredients associated with the original stressor. So, you have determined that the programmed individual can reprogram himself - one of the approaches to alleviating PTSD is to attempt a reversal of perspectives, such as, 'You should feel liberated from guilt, because you were attempting to liberate the people of South Vietnam'. Meanwhile, one of the things the exemplary Vietnam vet learns is that he/she not only was not welcome when he/she returned home, they weren't welcome in Vietnam, either - the '68 Tet Offensive was a brutal classroom in that very study. The 'therapeutic' method is often called 'crazymaking' by many vets. It has many other more professionally impressive names - psychomolecular restructuring, neurolinguistic programming, behavior modification, operant conditioning...
..
I know this sounds tough, but IMO, it boils down to a choice of free will.