Conspiracy Theory

[Meem]

I was a bit bored today, so I watched something on Netflix about 9/11 and the moon landings.
The most interesting ideas presented on the 9/11 stuff were about the pentagon. But the thing or ideas that really peaked my interest were photos and video of the moon landings, and the ironic fact that all of the original footage has been "lost."

The images are a result of a google search, not site that I visit by habit.


Some of the photos or video I found most interesting.
C-Rock

Now, once upon a time, I was much better at drawing than I currently am, but that is simply because I did it more. I was deemed accepted to the Atlanta College of Art on a sketchbook at an open house. I don't consider myself an expert, but I would consider myself very good at reconstructing things, correctly. Some of my "vantage-point-angular-perspective darwings" were what got a drawing teacher's atention in highschool. They were good. Well, what does that have to do with anything? The lines of convergence (extend shadow lines) in this photo do not appear to lead to one spot, causing me to think that they are not originating from one spot. Of course, this could eaisly be a dupe of the terrain changes. In a not totally unrelated note, why is it that all the stills are of remarkable clarity with no view finder or visual focal interface, not to mention, even if the cameras were shielded from radiation, would the film not be exposed once the shutter opened? Anyhow, I'm not terribly concerned about it, but I do think there is a possibilty of a hoax.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread422422/pg1

This video I found as result of looking for something else. I'm not concerned about the coke bottle. I am concerned about the shadows of the men. There is a point in the video where the man adjusts brightness and contrast. This makes the shadows stand out even more.
The only way I would think a shadow on the moon should enlong, would be due to a down slope of terrain. It seems rather funny to me that the terrain where the shadows fall away from the men appear to be gaining elevation to their relative positions rather than a decrease. There should not be a gain or loss of shadow (of such considerable length) of either men by a light source more than 93 million miles away with the movement of just a few feet. The only thing, it seems to me, able to cause this would be a much closer light source.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...02095282474054

There were other, very interesting things pointed out in other photos and video. Like some things about the rover, the dust it kicks up, falling quickly and not having a parabolic arc. And in one still photo, there are all sorts of foot-prints around it, yet there are absolutely no tire makrs. It has made me reconsider that at the time, what was seen wasn't the truth.
I thought it fitting to finish the initial post with song and dance.

[labelwench]

I'm rather busy wading through the latest run of corporate theory, which does put me in mind of conspiracy to fail, lol.....

Wearing hip-waders already, just with the local issues, so I'll have to leave these items you raise for others to address.

Your comments regarding perspectives are interesting.

Regards,

Lorrina

[austintorn@aol.com]

The moon isn't really there; it's just a painted sky.