Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | point source and Dirac delta function -
10-26-2005, 02:16 PM
The site discusses Dirac delta function for solving point energy source localized in spacetime. However, personally, I have a lingering suspicion that at the fundamental infinitesimal region of spacetime, there are two energy sources: one with the immeasurable value of zero and the other with the immeasurable value of infinity. When these two sources are in dynamic equilibrium then EM field are created. http://www.sci.hkbu.edu.hk/msc/full/billy/node5.html
The speed of transformation between these two energy sources is measured as the speed of light of Maxwell's classical electromagnetism. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | The river of time-how often can you enter! -
10-26-2005, 08:52 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The site discusses Dirac delta function for solving point energy source localized in spacetime. However, personally, I have a lingering suspicion that at the fundamental infinitesimal region of spacetime, there are two energy sources: one with the immeasurable value of zero and the other with the immeasurable value of infinity. When these two sources are in dynamic equilibrium then EM field are created. http://www.sci.hkbu.edu.hk/msc/full/billy/node5.html
The speed of transformation between these two energy sources is measured as the speed of light of Maxwell's classical electromagnetism. | Antonio,please forgive this aside from your opening thread,but if you could please indulge me with your opinion on the question you always pose at the bottom of your posts,Can anyone enter the same river of time twice? It has been on my mind for a while,Wouldyou consider re-incarnation as a possibilty
of anyone entering twice,or do you have another theory?
kind regards michael. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
10-26-2005, 09:00 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick do you have another theory? | My theory, which has little to do with physics is that when we are reincarnated as the rebirth of our soul in a new body we must necessarily become wiser than we were formerly in our past lives. So that we brought with us the knowledge learned instead of relearning everything from scratch. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | two-valuedness of energy and time -
10-26-2005, 09:14 PM
If energy is zero then time is zero. If energy is infinite then time is infinite. However, in QM the product of energy and time cannot be less than Planck's constant.
In order for these three conditions to hold, there must exist similar to the 2-valuedness of spin quantum number, a 2-value energy and a 2-value time. These values are not dimensional values in the usual sense but directional dimensionless values such that one direction allows the value to start from zero and to approach unity, while the other direction allows the value to start from zero and to approach infinity. The approach to unity is a rational function 'b' and the approach to infinity is a rational function 'a' such that their product is equal to their difference ab=a-b. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
10-29-2005, 04:26 PM
Antonio and I have had some struggle into managing to find out how to attach an acrobat paper to a post. But with the help of Robert, I managed to understand what is to be done. | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | the point source is a spiral with a convoluted spin! -
10-29-2005, 07:58 PM
The point source is a spiral with a convoluted spin,I think that when we look for
many sources we become confused,there is only one energy in the universe,one
source of all power,even when we think that there may be more sources of energy,keep pressing and they will All reduce to one,Such is the Absolute law
of economy dictates,and the most economical transfer agent for this energy is
that charming little fellow The vortex,Or Mr Spin himself! Intelligence itself the
very embodiment of mind into matter,and matter into mind,all energy graduates
down from a liquid like state,down through many trills,to become a tree.Or even
a member of this here toe quest!gravity,waves of any kind,electricity,
magnetism,light,plasma,thought,Ideas,mind, they are all the say,trace all them
back to One,and one Only.that to me sounds like a very simple equation,do you really want to complcate it,Well please be my Guest.
kind regards michael. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | vortices and spins -
10-30-2005, 02:59 PM
vortices and spins both need defining directions. The math that describe these properly is a vector product. However, vector products are not commutative therefore, there must be two directions and only two and no more. In the northern hemisphere, all hurricanes spin, say counterclockwise but in the southern hemisphere, they spin clockwise. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | give the swirl a whirl. -
10-31-2005, 12:12 AM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao vortices and spins both need defining directions. The math that describe these properly is a vector product. However, vector products are not commutative therefore, there must be two directions and only two and no more. In the northern hemisphere, all hurricanes spin, say counterclockwise but in the southern hemisphere, they spin clockwise. | Which way would they
spin if there was no hemisphere!And what would decide the rotational direction
of say multi-vortexes merging within multi-dimensional universes converging on
a singularity, each say venting into its own dimension,but using the singularity
acting as an anchor amidist a whirling fury?
kind regards michael | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | Sun and Jupiter effects -
10-31-2005, 03:15 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Which way would they spin if there was no hemisphere! | It is observed that the rotational speeds of the Sun are faster in both hemispheres than at its equator. The lingering sunspots seem to possess a cycle that is related to the uneven spinning.
For the planet Jupiter, the cyclone known as the Red Spot perpetually exist and no one knows how it keeps spinning without moving from place to place.
There are many astronomical anomalies such the rings of Saturn which is thought to be formed by gravitational sling-shot than by the vortex of each individual particle in the rings. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |