ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Master

michellemfry's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 620
18 michellemfry will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-12-2006, 02:56 PM
You have come across a great and significant finding that may be one of those things that stays with you for some time. Some findings are that way.

As much as I want to know why too, I'm hoping this does not come under the category of behavior that is just accepted, never questioned. I'll be thinking about this one with you.
__________________
Michelle
Reply With Quote
michellemfry is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-12-2006, 03:03 PM
no clue

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Any clues?
No clue. But how do we find something that is already missing? If you find it you are welcome to keep it as long as it is still missing.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-12-2006, 05:08 PM
The equation

from the well-knowned equation


I started deriving, modifying, and mixing with others and end up with an interesting: the same equation must exist but with Energy instead of speed= 1/sqrt(EcB) where the 1 is the value for voltage, E is the electric field, c the speed of light in vacuum, B the magnetic field. Then I ahd several problems of consistency in my proof, where I have not yet closed up. When I do close the proof, I will post it as an article, it'll hopefully be at the end of the weekend after the one that is about to start.
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-13-2006, 02:45 PM
momentum of light

a simple energy derivation \(E=\frac{p}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0\mu_0}}\)
where p is the momentum of light.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-14-2006, 04:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
a simple energy derivation \(E=\frac{p}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0\mu_0}}\)
where p is the momentum of light.
The equation isn't clear, can you just right it like I wrote mine, the it'll be easier.
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-14-2006, 03:39 PM
wondering

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
The equation isn't clear, can you just right it like I wrote mine, the it'll be easier.
I've been trying several version of latex but still couldn't make it work. Since my computer crashed over a month ago, no more latex can be emailed. It will take about $100 to remove the virus and still it's no guarantee that that's the problem. I had a Windows98 operating system. It's outdated. E=mc² but the momentum of light is p and p=E/c such that E=pc and c=1/Öeomo therefore E=p/Öeomo
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-15-2006, 04:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I've been trying several version of latex but still couldn't make it work. Since my computer crashed over a month ago, no more latex can be emailed. It will take about $100 to remove the virus and still it's no guarantee that that's the problem. I had a Windows98 operating system. It's outdated. E=mc² but the momentum of light is p and p=E/c such that E=pc and c=1/Öeomo therefore E=p/Öeomo
Interesting. My version just changes the momentum for voltage and the permitivity and permeavility by the magnetic and electric fields and adds a speed of light. From it, I derived E=mc^2, and even better, I found some interesting relationships... But I'm still in nowhere in defining it.

Now, if |f1|+|f2| doesn't equal |f1+f2| then also |f1xf2| doesn't equal |f1xf2|? Moreover, what would these two types of multiplications of the frequencies mean?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-15-2006, 08:06 AM
What could it mean?

If E=p/Öeomo and E=v/EcB we have to look back t at maxwell and even previous work. The equation VI/mo=J tells us that because E=(El+Fv)c^2=(El+VI)c^2 (this is because power is force times velocity and also voltage times current, and the El is the electric field which I write with the l to distinguish between E energy) then if there is no electric field, then the magnetic flux density J times mo is equal to the energy if and only if there is no speed (and because this is in vacuum, it's ok). But what about our gravity here? It really has no strength, but there is a speed for it: c^2. Moreover, q^2=EvxB so the energy that an electron carries times the energy of a magneton carries is equal to the speed of the photon that represents such electromagnetic wave.

I seem to walk blind, in the dark, but still I feel I'm getting somewhere... I hope somewhere only we know, so we may sleep in our valeys of equations undisturbed.
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-18-2006, 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
what would these two types of multiplications of the frequencies mean?
Sorry, I could not find any simple explanation for the product of two frequencies. What I'm working on is the ratio of spatial frequency over temporal frequency and this gives the speed of light.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
01-18-2006, 02:38 PM
photon to graviton

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
But what about our gravity here?
The revised development is that four spin-1 photons give a single spin-2 graviton.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Particle & String fundamentals baudrunner Noumena 28 04-30-2008 03:09 AM
Russell's Paradox Guille Philosophical Thought 111 06-19-2007 08:37 AM
Empty Nest - possible or not possible aspect of Big Bang? Fredrick Cosmology 17 03-22-2007 02:36 AM
zero origin of mind AntonioLao Psychology 30 07-27-2006 11:59 AM
Russell's Paradox no more! subversion Noumena 24 05-06-2006 02:16 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.