Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Quantum Physics
Reload this Page why empty orbitals?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
Page 4 of 4 < 123 4
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: why empty orbitals?
Old
  (#31 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: why empty orbitals? - 07-02-2006, 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbydefault
There is no such thing as empty orbitals...
On the contrary, the existence of vacuum fields suggest their reality.

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: why empty orbitals?
Old
  (#32 (permalink))
Orange Belt
HIGGSBOSONS is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 26
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2006
Rep Power: 9
   
Re: why empty orbitals? - 07-04-2006, 04:54 PM
As We All Know That Elelctron Is Attracted By Positive Nucleus But Which Force Stops The K Shell Electron To Drops On The Nucleus
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: why empty orbitals?
Old
  (#33 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: why empty orbitals? - 07-09-2006, 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HIGGSBOSONS
Which Force Stops The K Shell Electron To Drops On The Nucleus
I'm not familiar with the K shell electron. I have to look up references on quantum chemistry before I can respond to your question.

Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(t)·r(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 4 of 4 < 123 4

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Particle & String fundamentals baudrunner Noumena 28 04-30-2008 02:09 AM
Russell's Paradox Guille Philosophical Thought 111 06-19-2007 07:37 AM
Empty Nest - possible or not possible aspect of Big Bang? Fredrick Cosmology 17 03-22-2007 01:36 AM
zero origin of mind AntonioLao Psychology 30 07-27-2006 10:59 AM
Russell's Paradox no more! subversion Noumena 24 05-06-2006 01:16 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com

Proxy | Car Loan | Mortgage Loans | Credit Card Application | Hypnosis
Contact Us - Theory of Everything - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top