It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Quantum Physics
Reload this Page why empty orbitals?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
why empty orbitals?
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
why empty orbitals? - 01-09-2006, 01:11 PM

Quantum mechanics (QM) predicts the existence of molecular orbitals (MO) for the formation of molecules by covalent bonds. These MOs (not modus operandi) are describable by QM as the superposition of wave functions from the individual atomic orbitals. However, when atomic orbitals are combined three distinct energy states emerged. Whose frequencies are |f1-f2|, |f1+f2|, and |f1|+|f2| satisfying the compound triangular inequality |f1-f2|≤|f1+f2|≤|f1|+|f2|. The mystery is why the MOs prefer the lower energy state rather than the higher energy states of anti-bonding molecular orbitals (ABMOs) having two lobes that are external to the space between the atomic orbitals. Since molecules always formed toward lower energy states, these ABMOs are always empty. These vacant ABMOs strongly suggest the existence of extra-molecular volumes between atoms, molecules, bulk matter, stars, galaxies, and clusters of galaxy. This could even explain the quantum jumps within an atom. This quantum-mechanical emergence implies that the true vacuum is definitely at a higher energy level, which was originally suspected as having infinite energy without a theory to explain why. Therefore, the frequency of the global zero-point energy is then given by the sum of the absolute value of each frequency: f0=|f1|+|f2|+|f3|+…|f∞|. For a particular binary system, the local vacuum frequency is still given by |f1|+|f2|.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Master
michellemfry will become famous soon enoughmichellemfry will become famous soon enoughmichellemfry will become famous soon enough
 
michellemfry's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep Power: 16
   
01-09-2006, 11:01 PM

That is the best explanation and proof of the existence of space that I have been introduced to. Nice work.


Michelle
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
thanks
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
thanks - 01-10-2006, 12:50 PM

Michelle,

Thanks for your comment. But I'm still perplex why matter prefers states of low energy, while energy prefers higher states of energy or square of energy which is the same as quantized spacetime.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Master
michellemfry will become famous soon enoughmichellemfry will become famous soon enoughmichellemfry will become famous soon enough
 
michellemfry's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep Power: 16
   
Question 01-10-2006, 03:15 PM

Unfortunately, I've never asked why. I've always accepted the facts as they were presented as why. Yet, I like the question. I believe there is an answer.
Perhaps higher energy states involved too much motion for bonding to occur, i.e.the orbitals kept missing the opportunity to bond. All this is speculation on my part.


Michelle
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
4th degree Black Belt
baudrunner has a spectacular aura aboutbaudrunner has a spectacular aura aboutbaudrunner has a spectacular aura aboutbaudrunner has a spectacular aura aboutbaudrunner has a spectacular aura aboutbaudrunner has a spectacular aura about
 
baudrunner's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 535
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 19x in 16 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep Power: 16
   
01-10-2006, 08:33 PM

A new thread titled Boson Space might interest you. In a response to David's thread I provide some coincidental ideas which might answer this question.

Think strings.

Higher energies are generated by higher frequencies. In order to establish a three dimensional framework for reality to exist space must first be defined and this represents the very first phase of "reality building", ie. the very first quantum threshold crossed represented by the composite wave occupying that band of the reality spectrum which establishes the homogeneous construct of bosons that is space-time, after which progressively lower frequencies representing more massive force and eventually matter particles are generated, possibly as subharmonics of that fundamental string frequency composite, but each occupying a unique niche in the cosmic scheme of things.

Acelleration provides empirical evidence that increasing mass slows time, and that is a principle of quantum dynamics.


"There is nothing permanent except change"
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-11-2006, 03:02 AM

Antonio,

Doesn't the triangular inequiality impply that the f1 and f2 come form different wavelengths because |f1+f2|=|f1|+|f2| is impplied if both frequencies come from the same origin?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
good question
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
good question - 01-11-2006, 11:51 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Doesn't the triangular inequiality impply that the f1 and f2 come form different wavelengths because |f1+f2|=|f1|+|f2| is impplied if both frequencies come from the same origin?
Good question. But I don't have a direct answer at this time. All I know is that the product of frequency and wavelength is a constant, the speed of light.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-11-2006, 05:01 PM

I believe matter tends to a lower energy state because it's lazy. NO, I'm joking. An equation I suddenly find to be oblight to hypothesized during my replacement of GR math made me derive that somehow there is a relationship between the duality electricity-magnetism and mass-energy, which is covalent to the relationship between electricity-magnetism and to the relationship mass-energy that is, they are respectivelly the same to a conditional. I have to find this conditional, and I could find an important thing: for then we could borrow some QED equations and complete the cycle: we would have an electromagnetogravitational force theory. Exactly what Einstein searched, with no need of inventing dimensions or other concepts.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
probability theory
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
probability theory - 01-12-2006, 01:09 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
I have to find this conditional
The closest thing that I can think of is conditional probability and joint probability in Bayesian inferences http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_inference


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-12-2006, 01:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The closest thing that I can think of is conditional probability and joint probability in Bayesian inferences http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_inference
What I meant is I have to find this conditional in nature, for between our human knowledge it doesn't yet exists (or maybe it does but we don't look at it in physics).

What I don't have a clue of how to explain is why energy does the opposite to matter: it goes to higher levels. Any clues?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Particle & String fundamentals baudrunner Noumena 28 04-30-2008 02:09 AM
Russell's Paradox Guille Philo