[humanbydefault]

Part I.

There is no argue about the fact that humankind has gone a long way into the secrets of matter and the universe in general. However it's no secret either that as we [science] keep[s] a steady progress in many fields related to physics we still find ourselves in troubble when it comes to explain to ourselves and to others what's really "going on" inside matter.
If we go deep into those subjects physics find itself in crisis to justify or even explain we are "pushed back" to the same old and endless arguings between Bohr and Einstein all over again.
I've had the opportunity in the past to express myself here some of the views that I personally feel important to create some sort of a bridge, more like a "way through" to avoid falling into some of the absurd conclusions we are acostumed to hear and read in some very popular books these days...
For many those early concerns Einstein manifested all his life and in public are a thing of the past. There is [in my own opinion] a huge incompatibility between the concepts that physics stand today, namely: The theory of particles and the duality wave-particle when it comes to the nature of matter.
Einstein was right about the absence of logic and common sense those concepts above mentioned characterized themselves and their failure to describe reality but not in the way he proclaimed.
I have prepared for those interested in hear what I have to say a serie of discussions with some of those "puzzles" physics hasn't been able to properly explain. I'll guide you into a imaginary analysis [in theoretical terms] over those phenomena and I'll will use no math and no deep equation to that end. I'll relay entirely in your own arsenal of logic and common sense which is more than enough to me.
We have grown hearing about magnets. We all have a vague idea of what a magnetic field look like when the image of those iron skirls and their elliptical shape bump into our memory. Scientists has explain its existence by telling you that electrons have two spin [up and down] and that such effect "add up" in space forming a magnetic field. That's true, however they have missed to evaluate the consequences of such observation under the "theoretical microscope."
I wrote an article some time ago [half facts half fiction] titled "Between the devil and the deep blue sea." I atempted to describe with simple words what I saw then as lines of force around a magnet. I said then that atomic orbits were not filled with little tiny particles with the name of electrons, but by the complex structure of harmonics "projected" from the very core of the atom and its nucleus.
Perhaps many of you didn't realize what I meant to say then with "projected harmonics" and that is the KEY to understand what is going on with those violations observed today concerning the "Pauli Exclusion Principle."
Scientists [physicists, chemists and others in general] assume that an atom is made by a [unknown] collection of particles of different sizes among them we find quarks, protons, and electrons among the most populars. They affirm that an atom follows a principle that states that electrons will occupy their place around the nucleus according to a simple little formula: such little equation increase the number of "particles with negative charge" (electrons) as we give "n" a different value, 2,3,4, and so on.
The first problem [the first squeleton in quantum mechanics closet as I depicted in the past] was the actual [physical] size of ATOMS. You see, if we were to apply that little equation in the hydrogen atom we won't find any problem, however once the analysis was extended to include bigger size-atoms things don't work the same way! Atoms in nature extend from 1-3 armstrong... Excuse moi if I had spelling problems with the unit... Anyway!
my point [THE POINT ACTUALLY] is that we were to consider an automatic application of Pauli's Principle we would have atoms with twice and even bigger sizes that those found in the REAL WORLD.
Now! let's try to bring to our analysis the concept of harmonics. According to me, those harmonics were the projection of bonds produced in deeper levels in the atomic core and never ever a simple collection of electroinc orbits with a structure of their own. So, think about this for a moment!
A magnet showed us [as human beings -observers] that spin and magnetic force from each individual molecules and atoms were able to ADD-UP according to their spatial orientation [spin] creating a physically real spectrum across space. Magnetic fields are not the mere present of individual particles nor the coagulation of those but the vectorial [mathematical] result of the energy and directionality of the spin of that energy in space after their mutual RESOLUTION. Magnetism is a beautiful solution of energy in a life interaction, mass as "integral part of particles" are a ballast that no one could deal with if our analysis is correct.
I wonder... Isn't the origin of magnetism and its conclusive consequences a mirror image of what actually happens inside the atomic structure?
According to you, couldn't those orbits [they] have described filled with particles with wave capabilities nothing but projections and SOLUTIONS of energy in real interaction?

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by humanbydefault Part I. There is no argue about the fact that humankind has gone a long way into the secrets of matter and the universe in general. However it's no secret either that as we [science] keep[s] a steady progress in many fields related to physics we still find ourselves in troubble when it comes to explain to ourselves and to others what's really "going on" inside matter. If we go deep into those subjects physics find itself in crisis to justify or even explain we are "pushed back" to the same old and endless arguings between Bohr and Einstein all over again. I've had the opportunity in the past to express myself here some of the views that I personally feel important to create some sort of a bridge, more like a "way through" to avoid falling into some of the absurd conclusions we are acostumed to hear and read in some very popular books these days... For many those early concerns Einstein manifested all his life and in public are a thing of the past. There is [in my own opinion] a huge incompatibility between the concepts that physics stand today, namely: The theory of particles and the duality wave-particle when it comes to the nature of matter. Einstein was right about the absence of logic and common sense those concepts above mentioned characterized themselves and their failure to describe reality but not in the way he proclaimed. I have prepared for those interested in hear what I have to say a serie of discussions with some of those "puzzles" physics hasn't been able to properly explain. I'll guide you into a imaginary analysis [in theoretical terms] over those phenomena and I'll will use no math and no deep equation to that end. I'll relay entirely in your own arsenal of logic and common sense which is more than enough to me. We have grown hearing about magnets. We all have a vague idea of what a magnetic field look like when the image of those iron skirls and their elliptical shape bump into our memory. Scientists has explain its existence by telling you that electrons have two spin [up and down] and that such effect "add up" in space forming a magnetic field. That's true, however they have missed to evaluate the consequences of such observation under the "theoretical microscope." I wrote an article some time ago [half facts half fiction] titled "Between the devil and the deep blue sea." I atempted to describe with simple words what I saw then as lines of force around a magnet. I said then that atomic orbits were not filled with little tiny particles with the name of electrons, but by the complex structure of harmonics "projected" from the very core of the atom and its nucleus. Perhaps many of you didn't realize what I meant to say then with "projected harmonics" and that is the KEY to understand what is going on with those violations observed today concerning the "Pauli Exclusion Principle." Scientists [physicists, chemists and others in general] assume that an atom is made by a [unknown] collection of particles of different sizes among them we find quarks, protons, and electrons among the most populars. They affirm that an atom follows a principle that states that electrons will occupy their place around the nucleus according to a simple little formula: such little equation increase the number of "particles with negative charge" (electrons) as we give "n" a different value, 2,3,4, and so on. The first problem [the first squeleton in quantum mechanics closet as I depicted in the past] was the actual [physical] size of ATOMS. You see, if we were to apply that little equation in the hydrogen atom we won't find any problem, however once the analysis was extended to include bigger size-atoms things don't work the same way! Atoms in nature extend from 1-3 armstrong... Excuse moi if I had spelling problems with the unit... Anyway! my point [THE POINT ACTUALLY] is that we were to consider an automatic application of Pauli's Principle we would have atoms with twice and even bigger sizes that those found in the REAL WORLD. Now! let's try to bring to our analysis the concept of harmonics. According to me, those harmonics were the projection of bonds produced in deeper levels in the atomic core and never ever a simple collection of electroinc orbits with a structure of their own. So, think about this for a moment! A magnet showed us [as human beings -observers] that spin and magnetic force from each individual molecules and atoms were able to ADD-UP according to their spatial orientation [spin] creating a physically real spectrum across space. Magnetic fields are not the mere present of individual particles nor the coagulation of those but the vectorial [mathematical] result of the energy and directionality of the spin of that energy in space after their mutual RESOLUTION. Magnetism is a beautiful solution of energy in a life interaction, mass as "integral part of particles" are a ballast that no one could deal with if our analysis is correct. I wonder... Isn't the origin of magnetism and its conclusive consequences a mirror image of what actually happens inside the atomic structure? According to you, couldn't those orbits [they] have described filled with particles with wave capabilities nothing but projections and SOLUTIONS of energy in real interaction?

Harmonics is the key to unlocking many of the puzzles of creation,playthe right note,and all will be revealed.
kind regards michael.

[humanbydefault]

Part II.

*The secret hidden in "standing waves."
The interference of two incoming waves in a collision course "gives birth" [most of the time] to a third wave of a new kind. The third wave will be the vectorial sum of the constituents as we all know but the amazing thing about that "encounter" is the result. After a pattern of interference is reached all we have left is a virtual [but real at the same time] type of wave and not the existence of the other two.
Think about this! A new wave representing an entirely new reality [to any observer for that matter] but a reality that DEPENDS on the previous conditional existence of the two primary waves in an interference mode.
If one of both of the "primary waves" of energy cease to exist and the interference pattern disappear from reality then the new wave [the new reality] also disappear from the universe!
So, assuming the model of the atom to be just like the one proposed by myself in my article "rediscovering the atomic model part II" [in this forum] the entire structure believed by scientists to be made by particles [carrying an inherent amount of mass by the way] would vanished from existence IF and only IF the patern that made possible their existence in the universe ceased to exist. No PROTONS, NO NEUTRONS AND NO ELECTRONS WOULD "SURVIVE" once the interference caused by two and/or more speks of radiation energy [with the mass of a lepton] find themselves in a random pattern other than a mutual interference.
SPIN! what is it that many physicists dare to state in their books as a phenomenon that humans CAN NOT explain not to mention imagine?
GO to see what a standing wave process is and you'll be able to "see" inside your MIND the possibility for TWO and only TWO directionalities in space: UP and DOWN, NORTH and SOUTH... You name it as you wish! "Their denominations" are human-made concepts" out of pure convention type approaches.
A magnet is trully a real amplification of an atomic and molecular phenomenon of standing waves between speks of radiation sitting in the very core of the atom. Divide a magnet in two pieces and you get two magnets and so on... up to a point in what the pattern is destroyed in certain ferromagnetic materials but still other materials retain their magnetic field well beyond molecular size. Don't take my word for it! Look yourselves in the NET and learn about those amazing details that even though they do not find any plausible explanation to justify, I assure you, my friends, they DO have one!
My theory [one that I have shared with all of you here] do not contamplate the existence of sub-atomic particles on their own and their assumed cahotic association in the making of matter. My theory centers the existence of matter as a pure interaction of energy in a simple [and very well studied] pattern of interference and include MASS [a concept entirely different than matter] as the only way the UNIVERSE avoid the VACCUM... [please read my posting about the true nature of ZERO if you hasn't]. No vacuum will ever be reached No by humans and NO by any civilization in the entire creation! The existence of a pure and clear vacuum denies the very existence of matter and my propossed origin to it.
Physicists talk about the existence of the "strong and weak nuclear forces." [bla,bla,bla]. A force of that magnitude [any force for that matter!] needs a cause to exist! How could we be "content" to satisfy our theories with a force that exist just BECAUSE IT'S THERE!(?)
Use your logic and your common sense for a minute... please! Wouldn't be simpler and smarter to assume that such a strong force would be the result of an ENERGY such small that at the same time is capable of OFFERING TO US the basis for a structural pattern IDENTICAL to that of standing waves? [De Brogglie's work].
If [based in the "teachings" the universe has offered throughout centuries to us] energy has the only ABILITY to add and cancel each other out in space CREATING [as we saw above] a new type of reality, a new wave that will change the entire context into a new one, wouldn't be logical to assume that as bonds are taking place between those speks of radiation in the atomic core a steady transformation IS TAKING PLACE assuring the creation and "disappearance" of new orbital [energy levels] at all density levels?
Density levels! that's the ticket! A progressive spread of energy in space given by the square of a distance from the origin! Doesn't it sound like what we find in the real world?
Why the need for a "strong" and another "weak" force? Think about this my friend! One energy-One pattern the interaction of two [or more] high density energies in a pattern that holds only two possibilities for spin [UP and Down] and besides one that decreases its density level with the square of its distance from the center!
NO NEED FOR PARTICLES AT ALL! A marvelous structure of constantly changing and mutating energies based in a pattern the entire universe has forced upon them...
I'll be back with more of this analysis in a near future. I hope you'll understand by now why is so STUPID to talk and even conceive the existence of MAGNETIC MONOPOLES!
I believe [as I wrote once in my book] that metaphysics has very strong roots in our science today... I am not willing to accept the roll of "observer" and simply let "them" get away with it! SORRY!
I'm not going to change the course of physics, but I am going to give them a hard time trying to disgrace out treasure.

[humanbydefault]

Part III.
The Pauli Exclusion Principle holds its value as principle ONLY WHEN IT COMES TO ANALYZE SIMPLE ATOMS [hydrogen for example]. We have talk about the TRANSFORMATION taking place every time two harmonics interact in space, as the case with two atoms in a molecule or molecules in a crystal. It shouldn't be a surprise to expect that as more complex crystals are formed in nature such resulting structure will adapt its shape into a new one [a new reality remember?]. However! It worths mentioning that such "new reality" we may observe with our instruments in every measurement process is still possible THANKS to the existence of two primary ones in their own interactive pattern.
Tell me honestly: Now that we have discussed the true nature of atomic orbitals and their "volatil" [I would say: "mutating"] NATURE OF THEIR ORIGIN...
Are we ready to answer to those professors that could not explain why atoms are shorter than "they should be" that the very reason for such REALITY has nothing to do with an "ASSUMED INCREASE IN THE ATTRACTION OF PROTONS OVER THEIR "puppets" ELECTRONS"?
Yes my dear friend! AGAIN! Do not relay in my words... Take a "good book in quantum mechanics" [if you could find one] and see for yourself what I'm trying to communicate here... please!
"...an assumed increase in the nucleus attraction over the outermost electroinc orbits..." JAJAJAJAJA...Sorry! couldn't hold it!
You see, they offer no REASONS for such convenient change in overall force... LADIES AND GENTLEMEN THIS IS THE SECOND SQUELETON I FOUND INSIDE QUANTUM MECHANICS CLOSET... OH! but there are more!
Then the question of DECAY! Great, we know atoms decay [Id better say "neutrons" decay, it sounds more reasonable]. But you see! Neutrons are supposed to be PARTICLES also, well I'll keep you posted of any changes in their status, but so far they are particles indeed and they decay...OH YES! they do! But how come neutrons [as particles] have the arrogance to decay when their "partners" protons don't!
YOU GOT IT RIGHT! Another squeleton inside the dirty closet, and you know what? this one smells pretty bad!
Neutrons, my good friends, are those new realities born after two primary energies [harmonics] bond! Use your common sense for a second here!
Once the bond cease to exist [two quarks levels of spinning energy...no particles please!] what's left?
a phenomenon conducting to a separation of two energies and the scattering of a left over incapable of keeping them bond together into a new configuration... see it inside your mind... try it! I know you will!
I know what you're thinking! Alpha particle scatterings... Am I right? Well that's the 4th smelly squeleton we dig out of that closet of theirs.
The theory was brilliant, but it was flawed! There was no tunneling throughout the nucleus of the atom into the ground state and to the vacuum... Sorry professor Gamow! Alpha particles [HELIUM] is the perfect configuration of energy symmetry in the entire universe! It has "no place to be grasped" by any other harmonic pattern nearby. It doesn't mean that HELIUM is not going to keep with the decay process later on, it means that a bond between two primary energies reached a "moment" of perfect balance between spins... I'd say a temporary ZERO as I have explained its true nature in the quantum era. After a simple decay an alpha particle is formed inside the atomic nucleus and since there is nothing to grasp in order to hold its position inside the atomic structure it simple scatter itself from there.
Of course if you read prof. Gamow's work, you'll probably find a bedstory about the way the alpha particle got it's wings... meanning got back their electrons.
Remember what I said about the true nature of electrons? I bet you do! Anyway! they are not and never were particles at all, they are the spatial projection of energies interacting at a deeper level. A new reality [remeber?] orbitals PROJECTED as a consequence of a "spreading" of energy across space. The same high energy found closer to the atomic core that is being REDUCED in density as we increase the distance from the center, an energy that decreases its magnitude obeyng the INVERSE OF THE SQUARE FUNCTION.
In my next part I'll talk a little bit about the secret of why we "see" electrons with equal values when measured in the vacuum and why we were missled by it more than hundred years ago and still today.
HUMANBYDEFAULT WWW.HUMANBYDEFAULT.COM
See you soon!

[humanbydefault]

Part IV

Is trully EMPTY that ample amount of space observed between atoms in certain material lately?
To answer that question and many others related I will talk to you about a very important feauture of our reality. Among the other questions we will answer today we will be able to EXPLAIN why magnets repel and attrack each other when close to one another.
I have mentioned to you that a HARMONIC [you may call it an orbit or orbital if you like...] could only rotate or spin in two ways: up and down or north or south... doesn't matter the nomenclature used really. The KEY question here is that according to the specific harmonic you refer a specific amount [magnitude] of energy in a specific density could be present, no more and no less energy and no more or less density. That explains why colors and tones [in sound] exist in a variety of forms. As a reminder I'd like to point out [once again] that the phenomenon called 'GROUND STATE' is a intermediate STEP along the vast harmonic scale across the atomic structure.
What does it mean? It means that what we defined as STABLE sub-atomic particles [protons, electrons, etc.] are nothing but SCALES and each scale holds its first "key" which is nothing more than its own GROUND STATE. I mentioned to you in the past that between scales [ground states] we find steps in a ladder or levels where "they" assume (even today) that "all-mighty electrons" keep JUMPING up and down in response to energy absorption... Got it so far?
Now! each and every STEP [including of course the ground state naturally] is limited by the magnitude of energy it can "hold" during spin. If you remember, the final energy present in a standing wave will be twice the amplitude of the two participating in the interference. This is the fact that determine the actual density of the energy involved in a given harmonic. The second factor is the directionality of the actual SPIN.
What's the secret? The secret is that as you couple two harmonics [spinning waves] with equal SPIN you will feel a repulsion between both! In the case the energy density of both were equal there would be no "permeability" across them either.
If the SPIN of bothe intercepting harmonics were opposite one another, it's easy to imagine that a sort of attraction will originate... But why?
Why atoms feel attracted to each other? Why magnets keep trying to join north poles with south ones?
I bet you are smart enough to find out the answer for yourselves!
Of course! It is the SOLUTION in space of both spins what determines such outcome. Spins are matched in a coupling adding up or cancelling each other out according to a simple rule: "the stronger will prevail." Two opposing SPIN systems will "give birth" to a resultant [third one] with the final net product of the "progenitors."
That's the reason the net energy of molecules are observed as more stable and in a lower energy state. That's why magnets joined together in the direction of attraction will stay together and resist any separation!
In other words what happened was that energy spinning in opposite directions will be accomodated inside the participant harmonics and that results in a more stable and "energy-saving mode" too.
Those same BONDING-OPERATIONS occur inside the atom too. The consequence is no difficult to imagine right? Electronic orbits will "COPY" what's really going on inside the very core of the atom. Electrons are not particles gentlemen, they are the SOLUTION of internal interference between deeper energies made to confront with opposite spin with the sole and final aim to achieve a lower state and stable status of net [overall] energy.
Those physicists working today in trying to dismissed the Pauli Exclusion Principle are far from understanding what's actually going on inside matter.
But please don't take my word for it! Do your little search in the net and see for yourselves!
Was Really EMPTY that space as they stated as a result of their observation?
YES! and NO! It feels empty to our measuring devices because nothing [nothing that we could observe] could occupy a place inside them. It's NOT EMPTY because what you think as plenty chance for your "electrons" to "hang around" is precisely the final SOLUTION! Those "electrons" unwilling to occupy that "empty space" is the ENERGY-SOLUTION of a different configuration. Once an event occur in certain materials given by their own coupling characteristics a different SOLUTION will be obtained!
This doesn't mean that a Principle IN PHYSICS HAS BEEN VIOLATED, it only means that a smart principle has been "mixed up" with a theory that has given a right to exist to "SUB-ATOMIC PARTICLES." And that's the dilemma!
Tell me something! How could you explain a DNA chain could unzziped if you wait for particles to "tunnel through" in a HOPE for empty spaces to go come across?
The old and classic mentality of "PARTICLES" is putting the advance in other fileds of science on hold! Not just physics! In biology the speed of such processses are almost instantaneous BECAUSE it takes NO TIME to large molecular chains to adopt into different SOLUTIONS once the medium requires them to do it.
Stop thinking in electrons jumping up and down from one orbit to another inside atoms! This is 2006! It's time to finally get ride of that metaphysical dogma and enter into a new vision of our universe... don't you think?
Don't let them [your physics professors I mean here] try to convince you about things even they couldn't find a plausible explanation!
Use you mind! project out your marvelous HUMAN imagination [I know you can if you decided to] and voice your opinion about this.
Albert Einstein was concerned about the true nature of reality. He was right but also wrong about the whole thing as I have come to understand all these years...
If it's true that reality [at different levels or scales inside matter is prone to changes and "mutations"] it is also TRUE that the "primary reasons" for such changes are not subject to disappear from the universe. Energy is eternal and it is in a permanent transformation whether we like it or not!
THE UNIVERSE WAS NOT CREATED OUT OF NOTHING! Quantum mechanics philosophy [I 'd rather say: metaphysical ideology instead] prophesing electrons and matter in general with the "magic ability" to simply "POPP OUT" out of nothingness is unacceptable for me and I hope for you too!
I admire professor Green's work and books but I totally disagree with him 100%. No offense but the so-called "inherent uncertainty" as a feature of quantum mechanics makes my stomach sick...
I have no problems voicing out my opinion, how about you?
I'm not looking for confrontations, do not missundestand me, I'm searching for the truth as we all here [I guess...] and I assure you one thing:
I'm closer to it than they are... join me in my effort! I'm sure you could have someone you could talk to and help change physics forever.

HUMANBYDEFAULT

Reference:

"Rediscovering the atomic model- part two"
http://www.toequest.com/forum/physics-articles/824-rediscovering-the-atomic-model-part-two.html

"Zero and it's true nature in the quantum era"
http://www.toequest.com/forum/mathematics/1403-zero-its-true-nature-the-quatum-era.html

"Between the devil and the deep blue sea"
http://www.toequest.com/forum/philosophy-articles/764-between-the-devil-the-deep-blue-sea.html

[humanbydefault]

If you look in any book on physics you'll find that along with the word "electron" there will read some well defined magnitudes. Mass, charge, and even size of the so-called particle will give you the first impression that you were dealing with a tiny piece of coherent material... a minuscle grain of rare substance with magical physical characteristics also capable of owing electrical and magnetical properties among many other weird and unexplained features [spin].
They will try to convince you that such tiny "grain" [of something they don't have a clue of what...] is being a part of every matter found in the universe. With the arrival of quantum mechanics a number of circus-type of incredible "acts" like suddenly appearing and vanishing out of a clean vacuum and out of nothing are part of an already fuzzy image of our "physical reality."
Such misinterpreted and dangerous conclusions have "inspired" others to sort of extend such incredible [and impossible] behavior to our existence and even to the origin of the universe. You know their names very well. I don't find pleausure in repeating their names and their backgrounds just to disagree with their theories... I simply disagree!
As I've done before here I'll ask you once again for your time, patience and common sense and nontheless your open mind and vivid imagination.
Wouldn't be logical to conclude that the circumstances the measurements of the electron and its physical properties took place [then and even today] were influenced by the conditions of the vacuum around those experiments?
What I'm trying you to see is that electrons [outside the atom] are nothing but a quantum of energy that have been scaterred just like photons were observed to be all the time. The vacuum imposes [by reasons I can't say because I don't know them] certain magnitude and density of E-M energy with a given electrical charge and magnetic spin that coincides with what we have called electrons more than hundred years ago.
I've said that inside the atomic structure that density and spin is determined by the actual interaction of high-energy speks of radiation at the core of the atom, the vacuum "supplies" mass to avoid the possible vacuum created every time confronting waves of energy [originated from those speks] collide with each other in the pattern of interference: standing nuclear waves.
I have asigned different density and magnitude of energy to each and every harmonic [level]. If external [incoming energy] was supplied into the atomic structure the is logical to believe that it will be TRASFORMED into a new quatum and expelled as a photon or as an electron.
How was the process possible? By the simple replacement of spinning mass for an incoming E-M energy into the harmonic. Mass would be forced [pusshed] to the inmidiate vacuum for a short lapse of time while the atomic oscillator "remodulated" the energy into a photon or an electron.
This conclusion [of mine] points toward a different view of electrons [outside the atom]. Those electrons scattered from the orbits were not part of those orbits at all! They were MANUFACTURED in site thanks to a previously supplied E-M energy! [just like photons are all the time].
The vacuum imposses a different rule once the process is taking place outside the atomic structure. The measured [and published] amount of charge, mass and size of electrons are being limited by the vacuum and every quantum of energy [produced by the depicted process] that "fits" those strict demands will be observed and measured as one electron... as simple as that!
Will electrons [as quantum of E-M energy "traveling" across the vacuum] be ever observed to have a different physical property? I mean,other that the one Dr. J.J. Thompson concluded in his experiments?
You know the answer better than me... NO WAY!
It doesn't mean that E-M energy across lattices of solids will all have the same physical "constants." To say such thing will be a contradiction to every thing I've proposed here and trully believe. The physical properties of those quanta that "travel" across materials [conductors,semiconductors etc] are determined by the actual SOLUTION we were talking about in my previous postings. The process of MANUFACTURE does not vary, it's the same in all cases, but the amount of E-M energy moving between molecules is always conditioned by the final structure of the material.
At this point I believe that we could "see" why the concept of tunneling [the way has been stated by physicists] is FLAWED!
If a quantum of E-M energy moves across a medium [vacuum, crystals etc] depending the reality it faces during the flow:
Could we dare to affirm that a given magnitude and density of energy [electro-magnetic in this case] that only FITS the limits of one harmonic could violate everything we know and go across a barrier with different set of limitations?
That will be an act of God and a true miracle! The problem is that science and the subjects it study] are not ruled by any of those arguments and I have to deny such stupidity with all my logic and common sense... no offense!
The answer is SIMPLE. For physicists and the rest of scientists for that matter ELECTRONS are the last frontier. There are no smaller PARTICLES in the universe that the one we decided to named LEPTONS. So, it means that if a lepton appears on the other side of the barrier then it has "tunneled across" it or else... Well, the answer is ELSE!
I propose that the reason we observed [as a fact] that somehow the magnitude of E-M energy equivalent of that of ONE ELECTRON were seen on the other side of the "barrier" had nothing to do with a miracle nor with "inherent uncertainties" based on "probabilities" but with a wrong view of reality by our part.
ELECTRONS ARE NOT THE LAST FRONTIER IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE ATOMS! The atomic structure expands even further in scales and one of those harmonics beyond of what we know today as electronic orbital were responsible for the MANUFACTURE of yet another electron.
But wait a second! Thisgs could be confusing here so let's go slowly!
We have said that the VACUUM imposses a limitation referred to the physical properties of "traveling quanta" then how could be possible that a quantum of E-M energy manufactured in a lower energy-density conditions will acquire a higher state?
It all depends on the right amount of energy supplied and TIME. Professor Konstatin Likharev proved that a tunneling wannabe electron made to jump between two plaques under streamly low temperature conditions were formed slowly across time. He compared the process with a leaky tap. As an electron was forming in one side of the plaque time was needed for it to acquire a specific magnitude of energy before the JUMP.
HE MEASURED THE JUMPING ELECTRON AND HE FOUND OUT THAT THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE TUNNELING ELECTRON WAS EXACTLY THAT KNOWN SINCE J.J. THOMPSON'S EXPERIMENTS.
In fact he was producing [manufacturing] what we call one electron in a lapse of time with the right supplied of energy! Can't you see this?
The problem is that when E-M energy moves across wires and semiconducting materials that CONDITION does not have to be met.
Allow me to repeat this in a different way: Current moves across materials in different harmonics, just as light moves across the air in different colors! There is no LEPTON with ONE physcial property at all!
Tunneling is the realization of a logical and common sensical process of nature and not a MIRACLE.

HUMANBYDEFAULT