It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Quantum Physics
Reload this Page outcry of quantum spin
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
outcry of quantum spin
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
outcry of quantum spin - 02-21-2006, 01:11 PM

The outcry of quantum spin for its unintentional misunderstanding is contained in the 1st paragraph of Chapter VIII, Volume 3. 3rd Edition, Course of Theoretical Physics, Quantum Mechanics (Non-relativistic Theory) by L. D. Landau, et al, Pergamon Press, 1958 and quoted:

“In both classical and quantum mechanics, the law of conservation of angular momentum is a consequence of the isotropy of space with respect to a closed system. This already demonstrates the relation between the angular momentum and the symmetry properties under rotation. In quantum mechanics, however, the relation in question is a particularly far-reaching one, and essentially constitutes the basic content of the concept of angular momentum, especially as the classical definition of the angular momentum of a particle as the product of r ´ p has no direct significance in quantum mechanics, owing to the fact that position and momentum cannot be simultaneously measured.”


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Blue Belt
TinyTree has a spectacular aura aboutTinyTree has a spectacular aura aboutTinyTree has a spectacular aura aboutTinyTree has a spectacular aura aboutTinyTree has a spectacular aura about
 
TinyTree's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 132
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Oct 2005
Rep Power: 12
   
02-21-2006, 04:54 PM

Quote:
In both classical and quantum mechanics, the law of conservation of angular momentum is a consequence of the isotropy of space with respect to a closed system.


Is conservation of angular momentum an intrinsic property of the system- or a derived property?

If it is a derived property, then it is perhaps not meaningful to consider the limitations of position and momentum precise measurements.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile 02-21-2006, 06:07 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The outcry of quantum spin for its unintentional misunderstanding is contained in the 1st paragraph of Chapter VIII, Volume 3. 3rd Edition, Course of Theoretical Physics, Quantum Mechanics (Non-relativistic Theory) by L. D. Landau, et al, Pergamon Press, 1958 and quoted:

“In both classical and quantum mechanics, the law of conservation of angular momentum is a consequence of the isotropy of space with respect to a closed system. This already demonstrates the relation between the angular momentum and the symmetry properties under rotation. In quantum mechanics, however, the relation in question is a particularly far-reaching one, and essentially constitutes the basic content of the concept of angular momentum, especially as the classical definition of the angular momentum of a particle as the product of r ´ p has no direct significance in quantum mechanics, owing to the fact that position and momentum cannot be simultaneously measured.”
What
force could stop a quantum spin?Any Ideas!

kind regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
02-22-2006, 12:22 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
What force could stop a quantum spin?
From the perspective of theoretical quantum space-time (TQS), orthogonal forces could stop a quantum spin. Actually the existence of these forces give rise to quantum spin.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TinyTree
Is conservation of angular momentum an intrinsic property of the system
It is an intrinsic property of an isotropic closed system. I am changing it to an open system where mass and energy are free to go in and out.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
02-22-2006, 01:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
From the perspective of theoretical quantum space-time (TQS), orthogonal forces could stop a quantum spin. Actually the existence of these forces give rise to quantum spin.
When are primary forces orthogonal? And when are secondary forces orthogonal? If a primary force is orthogonal to a secondary force, what is the physical implication?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
zero cross and infinite dot
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
zero cross and infinite dot - 02-22-2006, 01:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
When are primary forces orthogonal? And when are secondary forces orthogonal? If a primary force is orthogonal to a secondary force, what is the physical implication?
The vector outer cross products of orthogonal forces are zero. The scalar inner dot products are infinitely large.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mind as Separate Entity Mohsen Philosophy Articles 17 02-02-2008 11:45 AM
Quantum Mechanics Mohsen Physics Articles 5 07-16-2007 07:04 AM
The story about Existence born from Emptiness. socratus Your TOE Theory 9 04-25-2006 10:28 PM
Why we fail to see spin conservation in the quark realm: Robert Duncan Quantum Physics 1 12-04-2005 01:52 PM
The Quantum Cosmic Mind Bob Campbell Physics Articles 3 10-11-2005 08:43 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com