[humanbydefault]

thanks for you comments

humanbydefault

[humanbydefault]

WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, Sr.!


“ELECTRICAL CHARGES ARE LIGHT AFTER A PHASE-CHANGE”


Tell me if you could obtain ice [a tiniest piece of it] from two atoms of water? Make it three atoms of water!! The answer is NO! You cannot! … And WHY?
Simply because you need at least FOUR my friend! How could you plan to build a CUBE if you don’t have at least four corners guaranteed? OOOOHHHH! Now you see what I mean! Electrical charges or the charge of ONE ELECTRON is precisely that “ice cube” came alive when the minimum number of components required to form the charge was satisfied. The component was electro-magnetic energy coming from a quantum of energy potent enough to become an electron. UV radiation could produce the photoelectric effect since THE right amount of energy made the absorption complete. That’s why I have said that photons of light DO HAVE CHARGE. My statement was as truthful as to say that atoms of water below freezing point are ICE! The dilemma here is that if I do not have enough atoms of water to complete the ice cube then I don’t have ice don’t I?
Don’t I Mr. Professor? Do I have ice Mr. Moderator if I don’t have enough atoms of water to make a cube? That’s my point! Superconductivity IS a phase change… We all know that! Above certain temperature resistance will poop out inside and that’s it for our superconductor.
If I was to follow your “line of thinking” gentlemen, then I could state officially here [for all the world to know] that atoms of water ARE MESSENGER PARTICLES OF ICE!!!!
I would be right on the spot and you know it since water atoms could move from one cube to the one sitting next to it and change… could I say: the energy of the ice crystal altogether?
The universe is FULL with examples where reality changes its FACE due to a phase change PROFESSOR!
Magnetism is a phase change of individual atomic spin [rotating in the same direction] being amplified and resulting in a RADICAL CHANGE OF REALITY!
Now! Tell me otherwise! Tell me I’m wrong and without showing me equations or theorems explain to me using logic and common sense where was I mistaken!
Until then… At least allow me to write my thoughts man without CENSURE.

Thank you!
HUMANBYDEFAULT

[dleviwing]

As long as scientist and all others continues to view EM radiation as being traveling entities called photons, there will be no understanding of reality.

EM radiation is nothing more than the vibration of the ether; they are WAVES in a medium. Many have misinterpreted wave interference phenomena as force particles of photons and bosons. The photon concept is, in reality, a quantitative measure of an incremental change of motion said to be the absorption or emission of energy.

[humanbydefault]

If we all agree that photons or quanta of E-M energy is capable of [as you have implied] producing or making the ether, medium or vacuum to "vibrate" "move" or "resonate" what ever name you choose, doesn't it imply a form of transportation of energy from A to B?
I think that you should consider the FACT that the photoelectric effect is based on the absorption of energy by what physicists recognized as "electrons." [you may have to know my points of views about the particle nature of QM and how I disagree so deeply with that version of reality].
However what you imply is that it is the "rate of motion" of your ether what caused that effect? Amazing!
Look, I never have said that any quantum no matter its energy content could "travel" without an ether interaction... In my [already published] book I wrote [more than two years ago] that it is the nature of the vacuum what garantees the needed "feedback" to any quantum to propagate throughout space and to move at such fast speed.
Fact No. 1>>>Think about it! Two frequency of light [with two different content of energy] would ALWAYS move at a constant speed (light speed).
Fact No. 2>>> THOSE ALLOWED QUANTA OF ENERGY [Be those electrons, photons or neutrinos what have you...] WILL ALWAYS BE "DISCRETE."!!!
You could not find light of every mathematicallly possible to imagine light frequencies! Light from the sun is made up of a numbered or discrete number of frequencies no matter the place in the cosmos you try to measure its spectrum... The Earth atmosphere has nothing to do with that conclusions!
It is the nature of the ether what plays a selective roll in determining what specific frequencies are ALLOWED to EXIST and move throughout the universe.
I also wrote [again more than two years ago] that a typical example of that is found in phosphorescence. When phosphorus absorbs energy it scatters [first] an infrared photon and it takes it time to emit a green one after certain amount of time. If the ether was a neutral medium such process would have no answer! However if on the contrary we assumed that the needed "feedback mechanism" is not present for every possible scaterring of photons BUT to a discrete number of them, then you could have a logical answer to why that happens!
Of corse! As we speak physicists do not understand why the unexplained delay in some atomic emissions and also why "electrons" take so much time to give the energy back... Typical!

Thanks but no thanks!

HUMANBYDEFAULT

[dleviwing]

HBD;
The difference is that like the scientist, you are viewing interactions of waves on particulate matter as an exchange of an entity called energy. There is no exchange of anything in such interactions. There is only a change in the state of distribution of motion of the wave and the object. The total quantity of motion of the object remains the same and the total motion quantity of the ether remains the same. Only physical substance can be exchanged and this does not happen in such interactions.

Absorption is nothing more than the waves imposing a change to a specific quantity of matter within a specific time. Otherwise the object will not sustain a stable change of motion and it will return to the stable condition. Returning to the stable condition propagates another quantum wave into the ether. When this is done by many objects at near the same instance, it is called lasing.

Uniform motion promotes the bonding property of fundamental matter (ether or particle) such to cause it to condense. Apply this simple thought to what you observe as waves and spinning of particles and you will achieve even a more fundamental understanding of what is occurring between waves and particles. Any change in uniform motion must be converted to the wave function of the object such to increase or decrease its standing wavelength but the object cannot lose any total motion without being converted back to an ethereal state.

I am in agreement with many of your observations of science today, however you make it difficult to overlook your anger and rhetoric type writing style.

BTW; I operated my own spectrometry lab including X-Ray spectrometry for 7 years. I'm well aware of the nature of EM radiation.

If you are truly convinced that you have finalized your work, then this can be my last response to your posts.

[humanbydefault]

Originally Posted by dleviwing HBD; The difference is that like the scientist, you are viewing interactions of waves on particulate matter as an exchange of an entity called energy. There is no exchange of anything in such interactions. There is only a change in the state of distribution of motion of the wave and the object.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Correct me if I'm wrong but you see matter and energy ALWAYS in the same context and you treat both entities with "EQUAL RIGHTS" and some sort of "macro-world status of dynamics..."
Persons like you interpret the Compton effect as the way I depiected [to be wrong] in my article "Rediscovering the atomic model part three."
There, a high-energy quantum of light was made to collide with an atom giving as a result one scattered "electron" and one infrared photon [the reason for the red background of the experiment]... see Arthur compton experimental set for those unaware of what we are talking about here, please. You could only explain that as an EXCHANGE OF MOTION like a dynamic energy shared by two colliding billiard balls on a table (?)
Photons were little balls for Einstein when it fit and considered it convenient.
The truth is that I have a different opinion and the worse part is that my conclusions would not change the outcome of the experiment at all. I demonstrated [hypothetically of course] that one or two molecules of water DON'T MAKE ICE. You need at least 8 molecules to complete the 8 vortices of the CUBE... simple logic! To MANUFACTURE an "electron" [which by the way I've said many times before that it was nothing but E-M energy with the right density just one step forward in PHASE] you would need the right [discrete magnitude] of energy and the "oscillator" in charge of reagruping, condensing and remodulating the energy into a new quantum. The electron is that product of the atom [matter] with the help of outside energy [supplied by any means]. Just as 0 degrees centigrade is the freezing temperature for water, the electron is the "ice cube" of a vacuum when supplied with the right density and structure of E-M energy...
You see, my friend, we do not agree on this basic point and and don't see a way I could convince you otherwise, nor that you could convince me that I was wrong.
Interesting by the way is the point that Einstein once said that MATTER was frozen energy... I think he was having a great revelation he couldn't unveil entirely...

Until me next:

HUMANBYDEFAULT

Oh! by the way... If someone believed that he knows everything and had all the answers is nothing more than an ignorant. I know nothing, but I'm learning a little bit more and more.

[humanbydefault]

Originally Posted by baudrunner I wish that you would reduce your evangelical physics diatribes down to the basic fundamentals of what it is that you are trying to say. From what I gather, the gist of wat you are saying is essentially a disagreement with the status quo in the field of quantum physics. Uh, just because something doesn't have a charge, it can still have a charge? Uh, if you squeezed enough photons into a well packed snowball type of object then you would have a charged object with mass? Or something like that? But that experiment is outside of the realm of possibility and the closest that we can come to defining a real photon is that it is a small quantity of the nothing out of which everything was wrested, including space-time and matter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"... entropy in the context of thermodynamics, is a measure of the amount of energy in a physical system that cannot be used to do work. In simpler terms, it is also a measure of the disorder and randomness present in a system." [WIKIPEDIA]

Why theromodynamics ONLY? Couldn't be heat the entropy result of light?
Couldn't be light the entropy result of electricity? Couldn't be electricity the entropy result of radiation?
Couldn't radiation be seen as an explosive moving into a fast state of entropy during a man-made use of it [like in a nuclear bomb] into a combination of light, heat and electromagnetism?

Energy is conserved and that's a principle right? The photoelectric effect [the way I see it] is a reverse of the entropy process (electricity-light) only POSSIBLE if it is performed under certain conditions... inside matter.
You have a vivid example of this in fision and fusion processes. We could make fision work inside the atom, but we are struggling without any results while searching for a fusion process. Isn't entropy a factor on this? You bet!
Scientists are trying to fuse an anti-atom of hydrogen. A mix of one anti-proton and one anti-electron... right? In my humble opinion it won't last for to long and the reason for that must be search in the true structure of the atom. Photons do interact with the vacuum in the look for feedback... No feedback no photon, that's simple. I can see that a few of you criticized my views right here in references to the "vibrating nature of the ether." Photons are for some of you only the results of that vibration and not the result of REAL energy moving on space.
I thought about it and I could only think that for those with that opinion light was somehow closer to sound that it is to E-M energy. It's true that sound is a vibration of a medium and that vibration does propagates IN ALL DIRECTIONS from the source with no preferred path. Sound transmits a dynamic energy to the atoms and molecules of the medium where it propagates [air, water, etc.] and the effect of those vibrations are received by tiny sensors in our auditive system... close enough!
Light is not that, and you know it. Light is quantized and its energy is coming in quantum of it [photons] but if that wasn't different enough from sound:

ONE SINGLE PHOTON MOVES IN ONE DIRECTION AND NOT IN ALL DIRECTIONS! Am I telling lies here? So, if light is a vibration [as some of you have stated here] how come that "vibration" is not propagating in every possible direction? Why only one light-sensor placed right on the path of a photon shot from a given source will click while any other will remain silent?
Those who have read about Russel's solitary wave and have some knowledge about solitons will understand why a wave [discrete or not] could move across a medium [vacuum, ether, water] as long as the feedback allows it to.

Thank you for your comments. It's always a pleasure to answer them.

Until my next...

HUMANBYDEFAULT www.humanbydefault.com

[humanbydefault]

I have a small request to you... Answer my questions using logic and common sense...
It's true that I swim against the [orthodox-general] "current" and that's controversial and difficult, but is polite to answer questions and no deviate from them when some one does not have one and insist in being right.
I have possed so many questions about different subjects and no one seems paying attention to them [a fact that I found really CONVENIENT].

"How an plaque of metal subject to the photoelectric effect for hours get its electrons back?" "Why there is no words about a chemical transformation of sodium in ions after being radiated with UV light after the photoelectric process?" "Do you really believe that the size of atoms [1-3 A.] was the result of an unexplained increase in the positive force of protons?" "Why some "electrons" take longer to "jump down" in some atoms than others?" "Why the different "electronic arrangement" in orbital when it comes to atoms like chromium?" "If Newton was wrong about the source of gravity when he said that there was a "force at a distance" responsible, why would Einstein be correct?" Einstein didn't change the BASIC PRINCIPLE namely the reason for gravity, he just change the explanation or cause of it. Einstein INSISTED in the fact that MATTER does attract other objects thanks to a "magic" space-time distorsion... I do not share that conclusions! I see gravity as a quatum mechanical process [a huge one] with a spin nature trully responsible for the position and momentum of each planet in the system.

Thanks!

[dleviwing]

Hbd;
The process to produce a Fermi-condensation (fluidic electrons) make it quite clear that not all electrons are the same. The common explanation is that they are in different energy states. The question is: "what exactly is meant by energy state?" Since a laser is used to selectively gather electrons of the same energy state, I would say that this simply means that electrons have different standing wavelength functions that fall into harmonic levels of a primary wavelength and thus quantum levels. This would also indicate that the electrons of atoms gather at deferent distances from the nucleolus according to their standing wave function finding a balance at that distance with the surrounding ethereal wave function. To change the position of the electron, you must make it do a harmonic change of its wave function.

BTW: a metal plate, if placed in a vacuum, will not retrieve its electrons unless a path of conductance is provided.

[humanbydefault]

Sometimes I wonder: Why is it that I can't deliver my ideas to the rest of the "audience" even when they sound perfectly sound and LOGIC to me... The reason is precisely that: "If we were living back in the middle ages we could admit [with a peace of mind and complete authority] that the sun and the rest of the planets move around our planet!!! Because everything tells us precisely that. Follow me on this and you'll see the logic too:

Our science [quantum mechanics... the one we consider official today] base all its theoretical principles on the "FACT" that electrons are quasi-particles or quasi-waves or wavicles [you name it...] HAVING ALL THE SAME MASS AND CHARGE only to differ one another from their INHERENT ENERGY and THEIR CORRESPONDING POSITION IN THEIR ORBITS... (?)
QED conferred photons with the title of messengers having the mission of "interchanging" or "transmitting" some "internal energy" from ONE specific electron to the "other" in a sort of exchange of energy... you know the rest!

You repeated above the same principles and in assuming that electrons are all made the same way only to ocupy a step in atomic orbits accordingly with some "interchangeable energy" they may acquire or not...

>>>>MY POINT IS THE OPPOSITE IN PRINCIPLE<<<<

I don't see electrons as a CONSTANT quasi-wave-particle or quasi-wavicle as you [and the rest of the scientific comunnity] do/does!

"I SEE THE ATOMIC ORBITS AS A PERMANENT AND CONSTANT PATTERN OF STANDING NUCLEAR WAVES ORIGINATED AS THE RESULT OF INTERNAL INTERACTIONS DEEP IN THE CORE OF EACH ATOM. AS ATOMS BECOME MORE COMPLEX IN THEIR INTERNAL STRUCTURES [HEAVIER] THOSE INTERACTION ALSO BECOME MORE COMPLEX CHANGING THE "OUTSIDE REALITY."

THAT'S WHY PRESENT EXPERIMENTALISTS CAN NOT EXPLAIN SOME CONTRADICTING OBSERVATION WITH RESPECT TO THE ASSUMED VALIDITY OF THE PAULI EXCLUSION PRINCIPLE IN MOTT.

I don't see and/or believe that electrons are all made equal. By the way I've just said MADE because I do beleieve that electrons are not a permanent expression of matter at all. On the contrary I believe that electrons are a SPECIAL form of E-M enegy being CONDENSED into a quantum of energy thanks to a process I called PHASE CHANGE. My theory [again: written and self-published two years ago in my "book of fiction"] centers the concept of MATTER as the result of a confrontation of energy-waves radiated from infinitesimally small specks of radiation-energy in the core of each hydrogen atom... making PROTONS in the process!

I see the atomic structure as the result of those interference and therefore those "electrons" we observe and use in our cell phones and satellites every day [traveling across the eather] are nothing more than E-M energy being phase-condensed into a special quantum with inherent charges.

Electrons are not spinning around "bigger quasi-wavicles" called protons by humans. It's all a beautiful and complex spectrum of energy in layers right from the core to the outer-orbitals... MY HARMONICS!

For today orthodox scientists "the sun and the rest of the planets are still moving around the Earth..." It is just a symbolism not to take it literally, please!
Not for me though! I am not just another one among the followers of that metaphysics... Sorry!