[humanbydefault]

You are invited to participate in this debate:

http://www.toequest.com/engine/site/news/comments/494/

Wating for your comments...

HBD

[humanbydefault]

I described BONDS many times before this thread. I said I believe that more complex [heavier] atoms are the direct result of EXACTLY THE SAME MECHANISM observed during molecular bonding between atoms. The difference between a molecule like water and two isotopes of the same element is obvious I know but the principle of how they bond to eachother inside the couppling is precisely the same. No CHARGES no PARTICLES no shared orbits facilitating electrons to change orbits as they desire... No myths.
A coupling is always produced by a magnetic attraction between two waves resultanting of different pattern of standing waves. Just as two magnets join into one piece as the consequence of positive-negative polarization two atoms also join into a more stable configuration called molecule.
Since the SPIN of each orbit or harmonic involved in the bond is different [due to the different radius of both] an attraction will occur. The interesting part of this phenomenon is that although both system together find a more stable configuration inside the bond... The bond is not stable itself. Due precisely to the different radius of the interacting waves the MAGNETIC MOMENTUM across time changes in a quantized and cyclical manner. Phonos are the best evidence that such instability occurs in every single BOND between atoms, molecules and even deeper structures inside atoms. This phenomenon is responsible for the always changing and adjusting nature of matter in the universe. Chemistry couldn't exist without this feature. We disrrupt bonds between atoms that under ceratin conditions had already found some degree of stability while changing those same conditions with heat, or the presence of other elements and energy.
My thought experiment is simple:
Let's place two magnets, presenting great attraction among each other, just beside one another. Let's fix both the closest we can and let's fix them so they can't touch each other. To demonstrate the instability of the attraction we could use a source of electromagnetic energy [light] an flash with it the region where the attraction becomes greater. I believe that with special instrumentation and laboratoty conditions we would be able to "pick up" a "modulation" of light occuring inside the bond. That modulation of "artificially absorbed" energy will demonstrate the range of absorption of energy and eventual modulation of the light "previously abosorbed." By making changes on the distance between the magnets we could "built" a graph that would be an exact replica of what's been observed in the microworld...

What do you think... Would it work?

HUMANBYDEFAULT

[dleviwing]

Fundamental matter, of which everything is made of, simply sticks to itself. Uniform motion promotes bonding; Uniform motion determines mass; This includes constructive wave interference functions. Any interaction of matter that opposes the uniform motions will disrupt the bonding of matter causing matter to disperse (expansion, like charges, like magnetic poles and so on). No magic, just a simple mechanical universe. Understand matter and its properties and you can understand all the terminology of science and dismiss the fantasies.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

I'm afraid I'll have to agree with David on this one HBD. Have you forgot, there is no observer possibility___at this level? I wish there were... Just as David says___it's a simple mechanical universe___yet, I also wish that David would improve his Lorentz' transformation views, and realize that angular velocity of matter/mass must change to linear velocity as it aproaches the speed of light___therefore, matter must lose mass as it finally approaches light speed, and all light speed waves/matter must be most zero mass___and they must travel...! Photons are required to travel___as they possess linear momentum___to even exist at light speed, or as visible light... No wave/matter particle can have both light speed angular velocity, and light speed linear velocity___a basic law of motion physics, yet they must have one or the other... They must always trade positions and velocities___a basic law of matter physics...

The absolute speed limit is the speed of light___either angular or linear___and never both at once...! Otherwise, the teeth on the gears break off___so to speak...

regards

Originally Posted by humanbydefault Let's place two magnets, presenting great attraction among each other, just beside one another. Let's fix both the closest we can and let's fix them so they can't touch each other. To demonstrate the instability of the attraction we could use a source of electromagnetic energy [light] an flash with it the region where the attraction becomes greater. I believe that with special instrumentation and laboratoty conditions we would be able to "pick up" a "modulation" of light occuring inside the bond. That modulation of "artificially absorbed" energy will demonstrate the range of absorption of energy and eventual modulation of the light "previously abosorbed." By making changes on the distance between the magnets we could "built" a graph that would be an exact replica of what's been observed in the microworld... What do you think... Would it work? HUMANBYDEFAULT