Magnetism is the same as gravity

[AntonioLao]

the acceleration is given

[math]a=\frac{q}{m}(\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B})[/math]

when a=0 then the speed of something is the ratio of the absolute values of electric field over magnetic field:

[math] v=\frac{E}{B}[/math]

[iseason]

The problem is none of these effects can be found. Let say we have two objects of equal mass m and equal charge q, the force from mass is F=ma, where a is the acceleration and the force from charge is [math]q\mathbf{E}+q\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}[/math]. When these two forces are equal, the best we can do is to define an acceleration. And constancy of the speed of light implies that this acceleration is identically zero.

OK ...i agree....but concider that the object has cancelled the waves within itself to a very large degree...the earth as the largest object has taken the rest..(giving it falling motion)...the only time that waves will be detected is in a situation where earths interference has been nullified...
i happen to think that the superconducting nitrogen has already proved this theory...
antigravity will occur when the A:atoms are free from other close asscociation with other atoms......B:at temperatures that electromagnetism is at it's peak
i also wonder whether when we throw a ball up that the break in gravity would allow us to measure something (on the way up)
a balloon filled with water shows something ....perhaps we can measure what in gravity ibstead of newtons laws...
just a thought

[AntonioLao]

superconducting nitrogen has already proved this theory...
antigravity will occur when the A:atoms are free from other close asscociation with other atoms......B:at temperatures that electromagnetism is at it's peak

A: The theory of superconductivity described the existence of Copper pairs (pairs of electrons acting as one particle) that is the fermions transforming in collective bosons. I think the theory suggested that Copper pairs are responsible for superconductivity.

B: It's an experimental fact that the magnetic field intensity is inversely proportional to temperature. At the temperature of liquid nitrogen or liquid helium, the phenomenon of superfluidity takes over leading to various strange phenomena,e.g., the levitation of magnetic disc.

[iseason]

A: The theory of superconductivity described the existence of Copper pairs (pairs of electrons acting as one particle) that is the fermions transforming in collective bosons. I think the theory suggested that Copper pairs are responsible for superconductivity.

B: It's an experimental fact that the magnetic field intensity is inversely proportional to temperature. At the temperature of liquid nitrogen or liquid helium, the phenomenon of superfluidity takes over leading to various strange phenomena,e.g., the levitation of magnetic disc.

the superfluidity (if that's the right word) was what i meant...also the antigravity effect of the disc is interesting too...
an experiment i want to do is to trap iron filings in a magnetic feild around a bar magnet....i expect do do this by making a resin and stirring the filings to make them rest in place....then i expect to measure the difference between those at the bottom to see if they are different from the top..
if that shows nothing then the next step will be a gel where i can veiw what effect motion has....and then try current added to individual parts of the feild..
if nothing more than a fun project
cheers

[AntonioLao]

an experiment i want to do is to trap iron filings in a magnetic feild around a bar magnet

i always wanted to setup an experiment where the speed of the magnetic current can be measured but so far no success. The theoretical difficulty is the non-existence of magnetic monopoles. The motions of charged particles in a magnetic field is well known and all high-energy accelerators are based on these motions. But the movement of the background magnetic field still cannot be determined by any experiment and as a matter of facts, there is no theory about this motion or magnetic current. Could this motion be superluminal?

[iseason]

i always wanted to setup an experiment where the speed of the magnetic current can be measured but so far no success. The theoretical difficulty is the non-existence of magnetic monopoles. The motions of charged particles in a magnetic field is well known and all high-energy accelerators are based on these motions. But the movement of the background magnetic field still cannot be determined by any experiment and as a matter of facts, there is no theory about this motion or magnetic current. Could this motion be superluminal?

please go to next message (didn't know how to delete post)

[iseason]

...............

[AntonioLao]

"LIKE MUST ATTRACT LIKE"

This statement is applicable to all scalar fields in contrast to its limited applications for some vector fields. Examples of scalar fields are: matter field, temperature field, energy field, density field. Good examples of vector fields are the charge fields (electric, weak, and color).

a gauge theory can be used to describe the underlying symmetries of both scalar and vector fields, locally or globally.

[iseason]

This statement is applicable to all scalar fields in contrast to its limited applications for some vector fields. Examples of scalar fields are: matter field, temperature field, energy field, density field. Good examples of vector fields are the charge fields (electric, weak, and color).

a gauge theory can be used to describe the underlying symmetries of both scalar and vector fields, locally or globally.

.............................

[AntonioLao]

so is it a correct statemebt for gravity....and /or the theory of everything.?

gravity is repulsive at distances equal to or less than the Planck length (note: there is no physics for distances less than the Planck length). Gravity is attractive for distances greater than the Planck length.