Unification of GR and QM

[island]

http://olympus.het.brown.edu/piperma...03/015566.html

Somebody forgot about the hole that the "hole" left behind...


Subject: Dirac's Sea, OOPS!!
From: island <island@sundial.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:29:53 +0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.research


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

island wrote:

Particle theory says that for every fermion type there is another
fermion type that has exactly the same mass, and therefore no priori
distinction between matter and anti-matter.

Dirac's "Sea of Electrons" was dismissed as implausible for this reason,
but the opposite value of all other charges (quantum numbers), indicates
that the asymmetry between the two classes of particles is due to the
that the anti-particle has -rho and negative mass, until it becomes
a real particle.


Vacuum energy density, (rho), is related to pressure by P=-rho, and so
vacuum expansion will be affected by pair production, as the negative
pressure component increases in proportion to the "hole", while the
gradient between the vacuum and matter becomes more severe via the
gravitaionally offset increase in vacuum tension. The expansion of the
universe will slow down or speed up depending on whether rho-3P is
positive or negative, but if expansion is proportional to pair production, then rho-3P equals is very close to zero rho, because pair annihilation attempts to keep up with pair production, as with the observed case for antimatter annihilation radiation that NASA's Compton Gamma Ray Observatory discovered in the Milky Way Galaxy. Omega is therefore always very near to one.

The gradient between the vacuum and ordinary matter becomes more severe instead when you increase mass-energy while at the same time
increasing -rho with real particle pair production, and so virtual pair
production should also increase with the increase in uncertainty, (dE),
that comes about as a result, and then real pair production increases as
well, as more virtual particles become available.

The vacuum expansion rate increases in proportion to the rate of
increase in -rho.

If the above described density parameters hold the value for omega at
around 0.2, then geometrical instability isn't a problem of "flatness",
and this is at least a more realistically plausible explanation for what
has previously hinged on a what was thought to be a precarious and
unlikely balance. The implication is that tension between matter and
the vacuum will become so great that we will eventually have another big
bang, and the next universe will necessarily be flat as consequence of
the fact that the last one was too, and this carries the constants
forward through time.

I don't think that a perfect cosmic singularity of infinite density,
energy, and absolute zero volume can exist and still produce an
asymmetric footprint for force decoupling, because it contradicts the
notion of "idealistically pure symmetry" that it is inherent
asymmetries which lead to all more disordered states for the entire
duration of the rest of the expansion event! Surely, the imperfections
which produce the constants must necessarily pre-exist at 10^-43.

There is no need for an equally awkward inflationary period to explain
the distance between galaxies on opposite sides of the universe if the
universe already has volume when tension between matter and the vacuum becomes so great that a big bang occurs, and so the asymmetries which produce the universal constants are "convolved" inherently forth to a higher order of the same inclination toward thermal equilibrium, as the process continues to move ever forward in time, in an impossible effort to achieve the "pure symmetry" of a perfectly balanced static state, which is more nearly achieved each time that the universe "evolves" over the described perpetual thermodynamic process.

This resolves the relationship between quantum forces and super-gravity by bringing back Einstein's cosmological constant without the runaway effect.

See also:

Entropic Anthropic Principle Defines ToE
http://www.toequest.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23

[ThirdWorld]

Hi, I'm ThirdWorld.

I've done my own TOE which was completed in Nov. 2004. In this I have looked into the most microscopic parts of the physical universe: down to a particle half the size of an electron and its constituent forces so small that thousands of them make up one force field line of this particle, yet in all this I have not seen anything that I may call "gravitons", "ether", "positrons", "antimatter" or such like.

I conclude, there is a lot of incorrect information out there...but 'imagination is better than information'.

Your Friendly Physicist, ThirdWorld.