[RascalPuff]

The Cause of Quantum Mechanics & Negative Inertia?
Professor Paul Dirac's proposed anti-particle (electric charge, referred to as a 'particle') and its proposed explosion upon contact with a conventional 'particle' (electric charge), may be an ongoing event constituting the status quo of reality as we experience it...

Consider a sphere such as a macrocosmic planet, the sun, or a microcosmic system such as an electron 'particle' (electromagnetic charge). Each generates a familiar, spiderweb shaped electromagnetic field, wherein the magnetic portion of that field emanates in a 'northerly' direction from the north pole of the issued sphere, loops around it in a circular motion which suddenly is traveling in a southerly direction upon reaching and passing the ecliptic middle of the issued sphere.
Whereupon the continuing loop completes a full circle around the planet, sun or electron that generates, maintains and sustains it; said magnetic field then entering the southern pole of it's given system of origin (planet, star, electron) to resume a northerly direction through the axial center of and relative to the polar system at issue. This described dynamic represents an ongoing cyle of magnetism generated by and emanating from, around, and back into the system that generates, maintains and sustains it. The sphere itself, en toto, is stablized by a magnetic field which is constantly moving in opposite directions - northerly out of, then looping around to a southerly course, and back into and through the core of the issued spherical entity in a northerly direction, ad infinitum.

The reverse of directions - from north to south - occurs at the ecliptic (equatorial bisection) of the issued, spherical electron, planet or star Each given system is also emitting electrical energy in straight lines at right angles from the ('particle') system that the circular magnetic field is parallel to. These magnetic directional reversals and electric discharges may correspond to and account for the uniformly quantified occurrence of observed - right angle emitted - quantum emissions.

In the four dimensional setting that Einstein has assigned to all material systems; these two (northern and southern) hemispheres are oppositely interacting with each other ('as anti-particles'), apparently resulting in the Dirac-predicted explosion, constituting the omnidirectional expansion of 4-D systems; not excluding the relativistic consideration that mass value increases with velocity. The omni-directional motion of electromagnetism may also account for the generation of negative inertia (the tendency to oppose applied force) in every such individual system.
(This is an unprecedented interpretation of the combined work of Dirac, Planck and Einstein. Copyright 2/2007 & 1979 by K.B. Robertson, all rights reserved.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

RP, I looked up your ideas at many other sites, and you have a very low respect, by many reputable physicists, cosmologists and other scientists. I would suggest you try reading and learning more from this board's ideas, before posting more of your personal fallacious ideas. We're willing to teach, if you truly want to learn...

Lloyd

[mkirkpatrick]

Causality arises within the primal intent,and extends its self fully within the field of the
relative quantum universe.




regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie RP, I looked up your ideas at many other sites, and you have a very low respect, by many reputable physicists, cosmologists and other scientists. I would suggest you try reading and learning more from this board's ideas, before posting more of your personal fallacious ideas. We're willing to teach, if you truly want to learn... Lloyd

Dear Lloyd Gillespie:
It is (very) unlikely that you've had time enough in your brief investigative sojourn of 'looking up my ideas at many other sites, to justify your proclamations about myself.' I have no way of knowing what sites you are referring to and you make no case for substantiating your onerous allegations. What you inevitably did encounter in your gathering of information about myself is that I have been banned from many science forums, formats and websites. Ostensibly the (conspicuously unqualified) banishments have made a deep impression on you. Perhaps enough to move you to ban me from this station also. Your harsh, prematurely hatched purportation indicts itself.

Condensed presentations of my work appear at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie , and,
http://forums.delphiforums.com/kaiduorkhon. Until if and when you address yourself to those issues and qualify your mean condescensions you reserve no qualification for passing judgement on me as you have; proving only that you have allowed yourself to be drawn into the ex parte pits of 'Conformist group aggression: the most common. The most dangerous. The most powerful, and the most difficult to stop'. - Eric Fromm, The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness.
And this response from you was evoked by my innocuous post, interrogatively entitled 'Quantum Field Causality'? I think not. You would not be the first to discriminate against me out of impetuous envy.
Upon consideration of the impasse imposed by yourself in this abruptly developed, hostile posturing on your part, it is unlikely that you will ever read - to qualify or disqualify - the material at the provided addresses; consequently and permanently disqualifying your self-indulgent narcissism from ever knowing who, or what you are talking about. I will continue to post - and read and learn - here at Theory of Everything, to the best of my ability, until if and when I am prohibited from doing so.

There once was a lady named Bright, who moved much faster than light. She departed one day in a relative way and returned on the previous night. - Eric Buller 1923

[Lloyd Gillespie]

RP, my assessment of your ideas is based solely on your own false ideas. You have your physical fundamentals backwards. This, and this alone disqualifies your ideas___period. Post if you wish, it does no harm to show your ignorance, you will not be banned, but I'd advise learning the physical fundamentals of physics, first, which this forum truly offers...

As mentioned in replies to some of your other posts, light must slow for matter to expand. When light accelerates matter must shrink. These are the facts___You've stated the opposite___Period. It's a matter density fact, that light slows, as matter density increases, through that which c is passing. You know, aether, atmosphere, water, heavier liquids, and ulexite, examples...?

Lloyd

[michellemfry]

Hi there fellow searcher of stuff maybe not so coveted, but nonetheless interesting to you. Not every aspect of theory is a rising star and many a scholar has harbored feelings for theory that are at the moment not popular nor glamorous. My advice, enjoy yourself, the desire to know something has many paths to take you down until you feel at home with overseeing the pool of knowledge waiting to be drunk of or swimming in. Wink, and a smile is all I want to pass on today.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by michellemfry Hi there fellow searcher of stuff maybe not so coveted, but nonetheless interesting to you. Not every aspect of theory is a rising star and many a scholar has harbored feelings for theory that are at the moment not popular nor glamorous. My advice, enjoy yourself, the desire to know something has many paths to take you down until you feel at home with overseeing the pool of knowledge waiting to be drunk of or swimming in. Wink, and a smile is all I want to pass on today.

Quite so Michelle,a nods as good as a wink to a blind man!


regards michael.

[RascalPuff]

Bold inserts by RP:

Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie RP, my assessment of your ideas is based solely on your own false ideas. You have your physical fundamentals backwards (So did Copernicus - there are those who say 'You've turned gravity upside down', for example, whereas, I've found - and expostulate - gravity: right-side up). This, and this alone disqualifies your ideas___period. Post if you wish, it does no harm to show your ignorance, you will not be banned, but I'd advise learning the physical fundamentals of physics, first, which this forum truly offers... As mentioned in replies to some of your other posts, light must slow for matter to expand. (Qualitatively, light is matter and conversely. Matter is a denser form of light energy, corroborately expanding more slowly) When light accelerates matter must shrink (As per Special Theory of light and uniform velocity, whereas, I am addressing the General Theory, about gravity and non-uniform acceleration). These are the facts___You've stated the opposite (I've addressed the dynamics of the General Theory, not the Special Theory)___Period. (In the following sentence, you corroborate my earlier statement of the identical quality of light and matter, and the fact that the more dense form of light - matter - expands more slowly) It's a matter density fact, that light slows, as matter density increases, through that which c is passing. You know, aether, atmosphere, water, heavier liquids, and ulexite, examples...? Lloyd

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Originally Posted by RascalPuff Bold inserts by RP:

All I'm going to say here RP, is the fact that I base my deepest ideas on my own interpretation of Newton; "Absolute space is absolute matter. Absolute time is absolute motion." Newton and Einstein are both correct, they are just interpreted quite wrong, through the ages. I base my knowledge of space and motion on Newton, though I full well realize Einstein's SRT and GRT have correct mesurements, as the measurement math's work. It's just too weak to have Einstein's work represent any model of completeness, as he used relative measurement in SRT, and coincidence in GRT, though his contributions to science are profound, as to quantum advances and E=MC^2. I say coincidence in GRT, as anyone could have stated the crossing point of gravity and acceleration, though the combination of the two theories can be the semi-grounding points of a new quantum cosmology. At the same time, I see little value in restating all his ideas as extra dimensions, when QM has already shown the connections and equivalances of magnetism and electricity. And further stating gravity to be the cosmological constant is false, if that's what you are saying. All the newest measurements show the constant to be 1.2*10^-8cm/s/s. That's far short of your 32ft/s/s.

If you read Lee Smolin's newest book, "The Trouble With Physics", and his friend's new book, "The End of Time" by Barbour, you will see all the newest physics, clearly laid out. From my reading, SRT, GRT, and all of QM are in for a bit of advancement. The newest ideas are perched to shatter many of our old ideas. Many experiments are now being set up to prove the varrying velocity of light. DSR has already been written, which is "Doubly Special Relativity", which stands for "Deformed Special Relativity." IMO, many of the newest ideas and experiments will have major consequences for all of srt, grt, and all of qm, including quantum gravity. Time will tell...

Lloyd