[David Maes]

Important! New experiment has proven that non-locality goes hand in hand with unreality.

I'll be Goddamned!

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by David Maes Important! New experiment has proven that non-locality goes hand in hand with unreality.

Would you care to elaborate on this a tad more David,I would be interested to see
what this is about!



regards michael.

[David Maes]

What I mean is, you can't get complete reality (with al its aspects), even when you use non-locality.

Even when you use non-locality, you still lose aspects of reality.

That's what I mean.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by David Maes What I mean is, you can't get complete reality (with al its aspects), even when you use non-locality. Even when you use non-locality, you still lose aspects of reality. That's what I mean.

I see what you mean,thanks for the link.



regards michael.

[David Maes]

You're welcome.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by David Maes You're welcome.

Within this concept is the realisation that all "apparent" energy motions are all related
and react to each other whether nearby or billions of light years away instantaneously.




regards michael.

[David Maes]

When having a first glimpse at the experiment, I think realism is more the problem than local causality.
(but remember, it's only certain models of non-locality which reality is incompatible with).

Anyhow, I think we're at the beginning of a second quantum-revolution.

[David Maes]

Originally Posted by David Maes When having a first glimpse at the experiment, I think realism is more the problem than local causality.

This conclusion is more a matter of preference than of logical deduction.

So to make a long (and slow) thoughtprocess more simple into one sentence and to avoid confusion: realism and a certain type (or model) of non-locality are incompatible.

[David Maes]

Originally Posted by David Maes What I mean is, you can't get complete reality (with al its aspects), even when you use non-locality. Even when you use non-locality, you still lose aspects of reality. That's what I mean.

Find this a bit bad expressed.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by David Maes Find this a bit bad expressed.

I can see what you mean David,no worries.



regards michael.