Now Anybody Could Understand Quantum Mechanics!

[vacuum-mechanics]

NOW ANYBODY COULD UNDERSTAND QUANTUM MECHANICS!

It was told by Richard. P. Feynman that “No body understands quantum mechanics”, but why? It is quite obvious that because no one could understand what the “particle wave” is. Indeed Max Born who gave the correct interpretation of wave function himself used to call this mysterious wave a ghost field!

Another point of view comes from David Bohm who said that “Quantum mechanics should be called as quantum non-mechanics”. This is because even the theory’s name means “the mechanism of quantum” but we do not know how and why it works!

Then it is not surprise that Einstein said that “Quantum mechanics is not a complete theory (even it is correct)”! We know that a complete theory should include with a philosophical idea which explain how the theory work, then it will give us a more confidence that we will not misinterpret and lead the theory to something crazy. Quantum mechanics provide us only mathematic formulas which enable us to calculate a correct result without any deeper understanding, so this is the reason why it is so mysterious that no one could understand it!

Armed with “quantum vacuum mechanics” i.e. the mechanism of quantum vacuum medium, we would found that “particle wave” is a rotational wave–packet of vacuum medium created by the disturbance of a moving particle through vacuum medium around. It looks like a photon which is also a wave-packet of vacuum medium created by a jumping electron in an exited atom. The difference is that a photon is a free wave which propagates with velocity c, while a particle wave is a co-moving wave which moves with the moving particle!

Once we known the mechanism of particle wave, we could derive deBroglierelation. Then we could derive an understandable Schrödinger wave equation. Alsowe could understand the physical meaning of Plank constant and the mechanism of the uncertainty principle. So the new quantum mechanics is not an abstract concept which was explained bymathematic formulas any more, but it is a realistic physical theory which could be used to solve the crucial problems in QMT!

One example is to solve the well known problem of “wave collapse interpretation”. And according to the conventional interpretation, it say that a moving electron in “two-slit experiment” converts itself into wave before passing through both slits and then convert back to be a particle before hitting the screen. But it is crazy, how electron could do something like that! Instead, according to the new concept that particle wave is a wave–packet of vacuum medium, it is easy to understand and visualize this magic interpretation. Actually what which happened in the “two-slit experiment” is that the moving electron passes through one of the two-slit, while its co-moving wave passes through both slits. And behind the two-slit, the two parts of wave will interfere each other and then guiding the co-moving electron to land on the screen according to the interference pattern. This is a more rational and understandable interpretation!

Finally it is easy to see that “quantum vacuum mechanics” could solve other problems such as “why do proton and electron in hydrogen atom not stick together?” with a better explanation than the conventional one, or “is energy is continuous or discrete value?” etc. Please see more detail in “Completed quantum mechanical theory (CQMT)” now presenting in www.vacuum-mechanics.com


…………………………………..

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear friends,

Nowadays, it is obvious that if one want to find TOE (which is the main goal of this website), then he has to “understand” how quantum mechanics works, beside its conventional explanation which comes with several well known problems.

According to one of the popular books“The trouble in physics” written by Lee Smolin (a founding member of the innovative Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics), it was point out that “the foundation problem in quantum mechanics” is one of the great obstructers in physics toward TOE.

So anyone who want to go toward TOE, then he was invited to read the “Completed quantum mechanical theory(CQMT)” in which it is quite easy to understand indeed! Anyway, anyone who has the problem in detail of the article please do not hesitate to let me known, also any comment is welcome!

Sincerely,

Nimit

[Max™]

Interestingly, there are quite a few similar ideas to Simply Relativity.

I found a similar route to a ToE type theory, but got there purely from a relativistic interpretation.

Oh, and for the record, I can explain time dilation and length contraction, along with a constant speed of light.

You were very close to the same ideas, but went a different way.

To start: the speed of light is constant because time does not pass at light speed, what does that mean? It means a photon is it's own anti-particle, or, it interacts with all time equally, as a direction, not a measure of change.

Time does pass as you gain mass, why?

Your Vacuum Medium idea was very close to this, light is just an excitation of space, since E=mc², light and matter should be interchangeable. Yet if light is just a ripple in space, what does that make matter?

A knot in space! Unfortunately when you knot up an area of spatial coordinates, they begin to lose more and more of their ability to interact with the whole of time.

At lower energies, this looks like quantum mechanics, at energies above the classical scale, this shows up as time dilation.

The faster you move, the less often you can register a "now", the same holds for increasing mass.

The faster that you attempt to go, the worse your interaction with time becomes.

Now, what does that have to do with the speed of light appearing constant to all observers?

When you see one second lasting 10,000 years, a beam of light which may only be moving mere fractions of light speed faster than you are relative to some outside observer, would appear to gain the same 300,000 kilometers per second on you every time you checked.

It says the speed of light will be measured as constant for all observers, this is often misconstrued.

As for length contraction, as you attempt to push faster and faster through space, the very fact that you're made up of folded space itself begins to work against you, resisting further increases in your motion, and drastically increasing your relative mass while the forces of the spatial drag themselves flatten your structure out bit by bit as you accelerate. Contracting the lengths of the very particles which you are composed of.

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear Max,

Thanks for the comment. Now I am reading the "simply relativity"!

sincerely,

Nimit

[hawkingfan1]

I read S W Hawkings book and could understand every bit of Quantum Mechanics!

[Mikal]

I hope you don't mind me calling you hawk for short....smiles...wanted to welcome you to ToeQuest. If you can simplify Quatum Mechanics in this thread, I will follow your explanations and posts....


Mikal

[hawkingfan1]

I would personally reccomend stephen Hawkings book "A brief history of time" as it explains what these particles are in a way that I, a teenager can understand. If you could tell me how the website works cos I'm new! I am 13 and am often credited as a genius but I don't understand all of Quantum mechanics I understand 99% of it. I was 11 when I read stephen Hawkings book and have now read 13 books on theoretical physics many of which concentrate on Quantum mechanics and relativity. I will try to answer your quetions and thank you for the greeting. I must tell you that I live near Prof Hawking and can get info.

[Mohan.C]

I would personally reccomend stephen Hawkings book "A brief history of time" as it explains what these particles are in a way that I, a teenager can understand. If you could tell me how the website works cos I'm new! I am 13 and am often credited as a genius but I don't understand all of Quantum mechanics I understand 99% of it. I was 11 when I read stephen Hawkings book and have now read 13 books on theoretical physics many of which concentrate on Quantum mechanics and relativity. I will try to answer your quetions and thank you for the greeting. I must tell you that I live near Prof Hawking and can get info.

hawkingfan, oh, that makes two of us, consider me as hawkingfan2...

A brief history of time is a good book for anyone to read and to understand the basics of the space- time structure of the universe. But, the book has not given an in depth analysis of quantum mechanics, the uncertainties in quantum mechanics are, very uncertain!!! Actually, I don't understand anything of it.

But, you have read a lot about it, and so may be you can help....

[Mikal]

Hi Hawk...can I tell you that its just a privledge to talk to a 13 year old who was reading Hawking's by 11...I am genuinely impressed and when I see someone young coming into the forum it greatly inspires me because I believe so very much in the intelligence of young people, as it expresses in many, myraid forms....smiles...

I have had some introduction to Hawkings as My son greatly admired him as just the greatest thinker in the world as far as he was concerned...I will try to pick up the book you noted and fit it into my busy schedule of study...thank you...

What would you like to understand about the website and forum????


Mikal

[hawkingfan1]

About the stars at the top of the boxes what are they for?