"One spark in the dark"

[humanbydefault]

The other day I was reading a book titled "God's Effect" written by an british physicist about 'quantum computers' and entanglement, when -by no particular reason whatsoever- I couldn't take my thoughts off the idea of building a true "super-computer" with something he didn't mentioned in his book: solid room temperature superconducting chips."

As many of you might know, I published [some time ago] right here in this webpage, a theory of mine about the reason for chemical bondings looked throught a quantum prism...one I called it "Theory of bonding harmonics."

What I wasn't able to figure out then was the possibility of a connection between the different elements found in the Periodic Table of the Elements.

Most of us have bumped into the periodic table many times in our early hours of boring chemistry at school and college. As you may remember also, we have been told that even though some elements show "similar" behavioral characteristics [particularities] with respect to others "well defined" in their groups, they DO NOT AGREE 100% WITH THOSE WE CONSIDER DEFINED BY THEIR "ELECTRONIC CONFIGURATION" and therefore they had to "evacuate" the interior of the TABLE and remain 'isolated' outside it.

I think I have a pretty good idea [a hypothesis perhaps?] why is that so.
As you may revise in my first work, I assumed that atoms bond chemically as the result of the interaction of harmonics instead of the "sharing of electrons" we've been taught many times in chemistry classes before.
As a manner of reminding you where those harmonics came from, I came to the conclusion that, as a pattern of interference [Standing Wave] is forming in 4 [four] different phases I used to call them "FRAMES", only a complete and exact number of harmonics (a sort of flactuations inside the growing wave) could form.
I also said back then that in the unique case where harmonics of two atoms matched the "magic interaction" that we identify today as one "electron" was it possible to speak of a chemical bond.
In my theory "electrons" around an atomic orbital was simply a possibility that a bond with another atom could match one specific particularity of magnetic and electric patterns.
I separated the concept of "electrons" inside atomic orbits from those we measure in electric current... but it's not the point to repeat to you all this.
(those interested in learning how I got to the next conclusion could go back and read those ideas).

What came to my mind in a flashing way was the incredibly crazy idea that it was precisely the weird behavior showed by those "quasy-elements" what could be not only an evidence of the veracity of my hypothesis, but the royal path toward finding "ROOM TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY."

Imagine that those 'weird' elements behave exactly like the 'others' we consider "normal" until now but with a "small difference"... They have an inherent DEVIATION in the elapsing of "their FRAMES" in relationship with what we know as "normal elements."
*** A time deviation that we can't detect since it is almost instantaneous>>> a fraction of the time taken for one wavelength of light to elapse<<<***

A simple case could be seen in L.A.S.E.R. All we have in a laser beam is the superposition of photons of equal physical nature inside the beam of a regular light frequency. LASER is nothing more that the "condensation" of identical photons inside a beam leaving no empty "FRAME" without filling it.

The L.A.S.E.R. apparatus only produced a "DELAY" in some photons so they can be shot inside a beam with the exact time dilation to fill the wave in the 4 (four) FRAMES that cover ONE WAVELENGTH OF LIGHT.

We are closer now, so stay with me for a moment longer...

Imagine that we were able to calculate [through experimentation] the exact combination of cryistals that could allow the flow of "electrons" in a way that no space in time [FRAME] could be empty.

We know that in the making of chips we have used silicon waffers imprinted with other atoms in order to change the semiconducting properties. a sort of filling or contaminants of different elements capable of apporting or suppresing the possibility of one "electron." ("dopping").

If I'm right in this and my theory is correct, I believe that using the right combination and dosage of atoms of those "weird and undesirable" elements forced to exist outside the body of the Table of the Elements we could build a SUPERCONDUCTING CRYSTAL capable of the continuos flow of current in a dense and compact manner.

The theoretical explanation is more complex than this but I'm convinced that it will work in practical experiments.

I thought that by using isotopes I could somehow find a parallel circulation of charges but I was wrong in principle. In my theory I insisted in the use of isotopes thinking that a "invisible orbital pattern" formed by neutrons inside the atomic nucleus could be responsible for the formation of a "hidden current" from one point of the circuit to the end... I see that I was wrong then.

I wish those with some degree in quantum theory and mathematics could give me their hints about this bold hypothesis.

Do you think is possible to build such a semiconducting crystal capable of the flow of a dense and compact current of electric charges?

Do you see my point in the comparison between the nature of L.A.S.E.R. and SUPERCONDUCTIVITY at room temperature?

Note:

I've been away from the regular posting for a while. I never abandoned the search but I was bussy reading about related subjects.
Some of the old membership may remember me, to those friends I send my regards and my inconditional attention.

Thanks

HUMANBYDEFAULT [HBD]

This is the site to find what I thought back then:
http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...part-four.html

[mkirkpatrick]

Welcome back HBD,have missed your most detailed and interesting posts,I agree you well may be onto something here,bit like producing fusion at room temperature too.



warm regards michael.

[humanbydefault]

Hi mike! How are you?
I see you've been are a regular member all these years, congratulations.

What excites me about "room temperature superconductivity" is the real impact it could have for humankind. Imagine -Mike- that 1/3 apprx. of the total energy transfer from the production plant to the final consumers is practically lost in heat every single second!

Could you imagine a transmission line capable of the transfer of electrical energy with "o" ZERO LOSS in between?

There are hundreds of websites where you could find info about the wide variety of compounds used today in the "race for the final discover of the holly grail of physics"; a compound capable of such task.

The reason I forsaw the use of lanthanides in the making of the perfect semiconducting crystal is based on its so0called "inexplicable magnetic fluctuations inside the element."

Those elements you find outside the Table of Elements show an interesting difference when compared to the elements contained within the Table.
In my theory [Bonding Harmonics] I gave a simple picture of how those harmonics -also responsible for chemical bondings between two atoms- are 'nature's oscillators' and only true factory where 'electrons' (electric charges) are manufactured given an external application of an energy source... a battery for example.

A difference in the actual orientation of those harmonics -naturally found in a wide range of elements- could be responsible for the "PERFECT MATCH" needed to counteract the net magnetic configuration at the atomic level in the entire crystal. The tip here is to try to use similar atoms between 'normal atoms' and 'rare earths' as they call them often.

We know that as we 'move' down in the column of the Table, we find elements with similar chemical properties because of the configuration of the last orbital. Since the downward you go, the larger the number of orbital its logical to expect that the strength and SPATIAL configuration of their harmonics will be different.

However...if compatible atoms from both "worlds" are matched inside a silicon crystal, we might find what we're looking for. When I say both world I refer to atoms that behave magnetically as mirror images from one another.
Today experiments use a complex chemical composition of oxides made with atoms fairly distant one another in the Table. I hypothesize that a combination of two elements with opposite (180 degress delay) harmonic configuration and equal strangth will do the trick.

Think of this Mike:

Once we find the right mineral composition capable of allowing the zero-resistance transmission of electric charges across, we could imagine a road made with parallel lanes of this material connected to an electric plant in their two ends. Light weight cars could be produced to actually "FLOAT" on top of the road, like in the movie "Star War." It's not impossible at all.

A special car equipped with a magnetic field in the bottom will be suspended in the air due to the inability of the magnetic field to go through a superconducting field.

It's been proved -if you see how a magnet have been suspended in the air on top of a superconducting material- that there is a strong locality in the effect, meaning that it is like something hanging in top of NEEDLES. Drivers in the future won't need to keep their attention on the wheel since the ROAD will guide the car along the way. To stop the car we could use a reduction of the magnetic field allowing the car to increase its resistance with the road -in the are where no superconducting materials exist- and a regular braking system could be applied to stop it.

Lanthanide minerals are even more common to find in Earth than you could imagine. Some are even more common in nature than Gold, Iodine and others.

No more oil or car accidents... no need for internal combustion engines and no worries about the environment...

what do you think about this picture of the future, Mike?

[mkirkpatrick]

I think HBD that a future you just described would be most beneficial to the enviroment
and would be absolutely clean energy.

Lets hope that this brilliant idea can be transformed into a reality before too long.




warm regards michael.

[Graybeard]

Hi HBD

I think what you are looking for .... when you finally come down to it is the explanation for the Quantum Gap

Check post number 6 here .... Click

You also have posted here ?

cool bananas ... greg

[humanbydefault]

No I haven't. The fact is that I've beem away for a while for no particular reasons.
I've been occupied with some personal issues that I couldn't avoid.

Anyways... I was doing some studies about what we know about the 'electronic' configuration of some elements accordingly to the number of "free electrons" in their orbits and their place in the Table of the Elements.

Those with a basic knowledge about the isssue at hand certainly know that those orbitals -I've referred to in the last sentence- have been classified as "S", "P", "D" "F", etc,etc. and the decision was purely subjective due to certain results in the "brightness" of light-emissions during spectroscopic experiments in the beginings of this physical field.

My point in that can be resumed this way:

>>> instead of using Aluminum and/or Arsenic or other crystals with a "plus" or "minus" electron in their last orbit trying to "alter" a semiconducting property of Si [silicon] regardless of their actual position of their "free" electron or "hole" in their actual orbits...[as occur in todays micro-electronics] We used a waffer whose electrons were right in the middle between two elements with SPECIAL properties.

WHICH ARE THOSE PROPERTIES?

Simple! Let's say that we would be able to use something I decided to call... "IMAGING DOPPING." It simply means the use of certain elements in the insertion of "impurities" [doppings] where the needed "free electron" will be combined with another DONOR of "free electrons" instead of one producing "holes." The theory behind this hypothesis is very simple indeed...

If such design could exist inside a waffer whose orbits are in between the two "free electron" donors, we could -probably- produce the ideal circumstances for a "condensed and/or compact beam of electric charges."

Such a beam made up from the insertion of "free electrons" into the same flow of current would lead us necessarily to SUPERCONDUCTIVITY at room temperature!!!!
The process is very simple indeed: Imagine -and this is just pure speculation on my part...- that we use an atom I will call it "A" and another I'll call it "B" in the dopping process of a neutral waffer.

Let's say that "ATOM A" has a "free electron" -as in the case of aluminum atoms used in today's regular chips- only that its "free electron" is located at level "P". (remeber what I mentioned before about the spectroscopic denomination of the atomic orbital configuration? GOOD!)

Then our "WAFFER" will have no free electrons for being a semiconducting element with the "D" orbital 'complete'. As you can easily see, "D" comes after "P" in the order.

Then we add a final dopping of our "ATOM B" -our last dopping phase of the production of a superconducting chip- which could be such an atom whose "free electron" is located in level "F."

So... What do we have? We have a waffer in the middle of two atoms which free electrons are an image from the other.

What's an 'IMAGE'...? THIS IS THE KEY TO UNDERSTANDING THE WHOLE THING!

IMAGE means an actual DELAY in the momentum of the "flowing electron." Just as we have seen before [countless times] with light in the specific case with L.A.S.E.R. when two equally produced photons are "MELT INTO" one single BEAM. We made a laser beam compact and dense by inserting two exactly "cloned" light beam into one. But the problem in making such remarkable discovery was reduced to PRODUCING A SPECIFIC TIME DELAY DURING THE CONVERSION FROM TWO TO ONE SINGLE BEAM OF LIGHT.

ROOM TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTIVITY -the basics for a new future in science- MAY BE HIDDEN IN A SIMPLE TRICK: ARTIFICIALLY CREATING A DELAY CAPABLE OF MELTING TWO FLOW OF ELECTRICAL CHARGES INTO JUST ONE!!!

Those who have learn or read a little bit about the countless theories about SUPERCONDUCTIVITY have problably bumped into one that predicted a "pairing of electrons" during the current flow across the wire.
Since this theory works for low temperature materials and not to good for high temp ones, I always thought that there was some truth in it in any case.

By lowering the environmental temperature we may have been provoking the "pairing of free electrons" while changing the atomic structure of the crystals in case. Once the temp rises up to a certain limit, superconductivity ceased to exist due to a rearrangement of the atoms inside it.

But if my hypothesis is correct, we may be looking fortunately to a case when temperature is not a determining factor in reaching the task of "pairing electrons." The needed "PAIRING OF ELECTRONS" will occur due to a delay artificially created when we dop atoms whose "free electrons" were located in diferent orbitals accordingly to spectometrical considerations.

The roll of a waffer in all this is simple: A waffer is not just the support for the doppings but the medium for energy to move from the source to the return polarity. when you have an open circuit no flow of charges is reached, you need to connect both ends of the power source to 'close the circuit.'
However, since the MEDIUM or surface for transfer of energy is also chemically equally distant from both "doppers", no effect may tilt the results into one extreme or the other. Today those considerations are missed due to the fact that we are far back in the developing of micro-electronics [micro-chips]. I believe that in the near future when these ideas are developed by experimentalists, a revolutionary effect will have an universal application in our technology...from cars that float in the road to power lines without one ampere of loss to microelectronics with a lifetime batery-use, etc.

I hope that I made a little bit more accesible for all my ideas this time.

I welcome everyone's suggestions and comments as well.

Your friend in time:

HBD

[humanbydefault]

There are many issues in physics that turn to be unreal after time.

I am one who believe that there are "theoretical gaps" inside today's concepts in physics but as long as those ideas are not challenge by contradictory results and another theory comes up with numbers to prove it ...nothing will change.

It would sufice to mention a simple example to prove my point:

It has been generally accepted the idea that "photons" are the 'messengers' of the electromagnetic field. [the work of Dr. Richard Feynman]. I don't share his concept since light is incapable of reproducing a magnetic field whatsoever.

magnetic fields or electromagnetism is an inherent property of matter. The interaction that -in my humble opinion- causes the mentioned effect between two or more atoms is part of the structure of the atomic orbits and their relationship with TIME.

In my theory [Bonding Harmonics] I dedicated an entire chapter to explain my points of views about the true nature of the magnetic field. eveidences...? I have non, but in the other hand, the others have no evidences to prove me wrong either.

We have the limitation of "c" in our vision about the universe and its nature.

What would you think if I said to you that the mere existence of a positive and a negative pole in magnetism is a process where each magnetic pole "shares" half of the TIME a single wavelength of light is compossed. It is like "cutting in four parts" a 'unit of time.'

It remains a hypothetical for us since "c" can't be fracture in any part smaller than what it already is. Think about it for a moment... Einstein demonstrated that nothing can travel faster than an electromagnetic wave in the vaccum of space and that velocity was considered as "c". [approx. 300,000 km/sec.]

Could we make such an apparatus capable of recording events in less than that velocity? Naturally not! But! We have been able to (using some recently advanced spectrographical methods] to "see" a molecule in its 3 (three) dimensional projection...right?

The trick...as I explained in my work- was to make the measurements using pulses in a random time-correlation between them.

To make my example even simpler, allow me to give you a hypothetical experiment that could be reproduced in the lab.

We all know that when you go to the movie theatre you enjoy a film without having any idea of the number of "frames" they have to use to give you the effect of continuity...true?

Most of those frames are "invisible" to you since your eyes are not CAPABLE of distinguishing between the "space of time" each frame takes to appear on the screen. However without the number of frames and their changing speed in the screen you wouldn't be able to enjoy the movie.

What would you think if I do a little trick so you could enjoy less the projection:

I would project two identical movies with a time-differential that even your eyes aren't capable of detecting. Probably you still understand what's happening in the screen but you certainly will feel a little bit unconfortable with the image. perhaps you will suffer of a headache or vision tiredness at the end of the projection..who knows? I have just reproduced the same kind of trick used by a Nobel prized to "trick" "c" in favor of advancing our knowledge about molecular dimensionality.

I know it sounds annoying to you just to think about it but believe me...It's the beginning of understanding what we have been missing all this time.

Magnetism is not the interchange of 'photons" between attracting bodies [matter] but a process inherently connected with the origin of matter elapsing in a fraction of the time we thought can't be smaller than a wavelength of light.

The entire fundaments of quantum mechanics is based on the insivisibility of one quanta of energy. A quanta of energy is precisely indivisible because it can't be seen in its "interior" and in the way it was born. It would require such an observing velocity that would enable us to see our bodies in a state of FLUX between what could be consider a "multiverse" [or multi-universe].

A diversity of dimensions where our atoms are effectively projected in a less than a wavelength of light.

Magnetism is one of the processes depended on this time fractionality too. We can't "see" just a north pole or a south pole, we can only see that both are in place all the time since for us "all the time" is exactly the same continuity seen before during our experiment in the movie theatre. In fact, according to my arguments, it is precisely the fractionality of time in the existence of both poles what causes the attractive effect between them or the contrary effect when identical poles are put face-to-face.

AT NO TIME "PHOTONS" [quanta of light] WERE PART OF THE PROCESS.
That's is why I believe that SUPERCONDUCTIVITY at room temp is achievable in a near future, but it will take a "leap of faith" not a "quantum leap" as a jump into another state, but a radical revision of what we have believed all this time about physics.

HBD

[humanbydefault]

(cont from top)
Dr. Feynman devised a process of "photonic interchange" of E-M energy to explain why some electrons [and other fermions] could become more or less "energetic."

According to his diagrams (those that made him a star in the physical community) there must be some sort of "transfer of photons" to explain why electrons 'communicate' among each other.

We know [as a fact] that the energy of one electron is not always the same even inside atoms. The net energy of a free electron as it travels in the vaccum is a fixed magnitude however. Since the model of the atom in my theory is entirely different than the one officially accepted so far, I don't se the need to accept the existence of
electrons orbiting a nucleus whatsoever. Orbits are the structure of standing waves emanating from a process of energy interaction well deep inside the core of each atom. The standing wave process in each orbit forms harmonics in the process [two colliding waves] and it is precisely those harmonics what take part in the chemical bonding process and in the absorption of external energy manufacturing "photons" or "electrons" capable of flowing across materials and even the vacuum.

In condesned matter physics we've been told that matter absorbs energy and electrons [assumed orbiting the atoms] make what's consider to be a "JUMP" into the next orbital. That's called also a "quantum leap." The way I explain such absorption of energy is much more simple and logical.

If in fact there is the process of standing waves -observed and accepted according to experimental evidences- why don't we consider the possibility that external waves of energy could be superimpossed inside the structure of the standing wave in the process in the case a perfect MATCH is achieved?

The point needed to understand such alternative thinking can't be accepted if we ignore the roll of TIME and its fractionability in the entire analysis.

Also in condensed matter physics there is something called "pseudo-gaps." A more complex concept that accept the possibility that in some superconductors, the lower of temp could allow the pairing of electrons somehow. But the point I want you to see is that those pairing of electrons -the key to achieve superconduction one day- is occuring at an angle other than the normal flow of current. In other words, that those "INVISIBLE GAPS" that suddenly openned up to the circulation of current are somehow "hiden in some sort of invisible dimension" impossible to exaplin so far by anyone involved in this important researches.

But you can now, do you? If we assume that atoms are existing in 3 dimensions as anything else in the universe, then why not consider the possibility that harmonics produced in the standing wave process that stand as orbitals are also moving in time and space around the nucleus?

Since the number of harmonics vary according to the size of the atom and each orbit have to be "completed" at the very end of the lapse of time equal to one wavelength of light... isn't it possible to think that we are missing a lot of quantum possibilities inside what we have considered to be a sacred 'unit of indivisible time.'?

Those quantum pseudo-gaps are the trick nature have used to produce superconductivity at room temp and neither research have been able to understand yet. Since those scientist around the world can't see the difference between the "frames of the film" projected to their amusement...they will keep ignoring the very fabric of matter and the secrets hidden in the very nature of TIME.

That's is why I believe that SUPERCONDUCTIVITY at room temp is achievable in a near future, but it will take a "leap of faith" not a "quantum leap" as a jump into another state, but a radical revision of what we have believed all this time about physics.

HBD