[Graybeard]

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Thanks for the promotion Greg but I’m still just an engineer that used to design the instruments that performed the tests that gave our scientist data.

Dave .... wasn't it Leon Lederman that said there are two types of physicists. Those who come up with the theorys and those who have to perform the experiments on the theorys.

Lederman was of the second group, he liked it that way, kept him in touch with reality .... lol

cool bananas ... greg

[MJA]

Originally Posted by Graybeard

Nothing can be known with certainty.

Unless of course One knows the truth.

=
MJA

[Graybeard]

Originally Posted by MJA

Unless of course One knows the truth.

=
MJA

Hi Mikey .... long time no see. Hows life with you ?

Even with your view of the world, are you seriously telling me that QM plays no part in your world, nor any part in the TOE ? Or do you mean that QM will eventually provide a logical, self explanatory answer... an answer that you are somehow privy to, but which you decline to share or elaborate on ?

greg

[MJA]

Originally Posted by Graybeard

Hi Mikey .... long time no see. Hows life with you ?

Even with your view of the world, are you seriously telling me that QM plays no part in your world, nor any part in the TOE ? Or do you mean that QM will eventually provide a logical, self explanatory answer... an answer that you are somehow privy to, but which you decline to share or elaborate on ?

greg

Dear Mr. Pirate,

I am certain that QM only takes mankind further from the truth.
And I decline to share Greg?
I see it is you that declines to listen.
Sharing nature's truth of equality is what brings me here.
Even though you ask so disrespectfully, I'll try again:
By simply removing any QM, probability, uncertainty or doubt from any equation,
the single truth of equality is all that remains.
Einstein mathematically came the closest to Grand Unification, TOE or nature's truth by his
reduction of nature to his most famous equation "e=mc2".
Had he continued down the path of simplification he would have found what he was looking for, the truth, what lay infront of him as well as all of us all along.
The simple mathematical truth of =.
Rather than further simplification, the correct path, he began complicating his eqautions and unfortunately got lost in his own quagmire.
While he was getting lost, science went down the road of QM, a path that leads only to further uncertainty and probability.
Building knowledge on a foundation of probability leads only to further probability, not certainty, nothing more.
Simplicity son, is where the truth lies, and = is nature's most simple mathematical truth.
Empirically, equal is the solution to unity, justice, freedom, oneness, TOE or UFT.
Equal is the solution to Life!
Which way are you going Greg?
Like science, or Einstein, a more "elaborate" complicated, uncertain way?
Or down the faith road, another road of doubt.
I can only tell you Greg, your going the wrong way.
The truth, the right way, is much more simple than you think.
Perhaps if you remove that silly patch from your eye, and quit playing pirate games, you'll see it too!


=
MJA

[Graybeard]

Originally Posted by MJA

Einstein mathematically came the closest to Grand Unification, TOE or nature's truth by his
reduction of nature to his most famous equation "e=mc2".

Had he continued down the path of simplification he would have found what he was looking for, the truth, what lay infront of him as well as all of us all along. The simple mathematical truth of =.

Nearly everything in your reply is opinion, not explanation. To make it simple, please show me how you break down e=mc^2, step by step, till you find what were all looking for ?

cool bananas ... greg

[MJA]

GRAND UNIFICATION

TRUTH

UNIFICATION IS EQUALITY

SIMPLY REMOVE THE UNCERTAINTY

OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT

OF MEASURE

E = mc2

E = mc

E = m

=

MJA

[Graybeard]

Could you please stretch it to a paragraph for each step, not just a heading ?

I don't need a science book, just a few sentences for each heading. Pretend your child has just come home from school with this list of headings and the teacher has asked her/him to write a short explanation for each one. You don't want her/him to fail, how do you help ???

cool bananas ... greg

[MJA]

Hi Greg,

Sorry to answer your question with a question,
but what don't you understand?
Are you having trouble with the uncertainty of measure?
Don't feel bad, the greatest minds in science could not solve it either.
Can't let go of what we have been taught, to measure everything?
Ya, me too.
Democritus said: "Man is the measure of all things."
It has been the problem for many many years.
But once you free yourself, once you remove uncertainty and doubt from the equations of life, the truth is all that remains.
Remove those measures, those uncertainties, and you will find equal to be the truth that will set you free.
Its worth the try Greg, keep trying!


=
MJA

[bottomlander]

Originally Posted by MJA

GRAND UNIFICATION

TRUTH

UNIFICATION IS EQUALITY

SIMPLY REMOVE THE UNCERTAINTY

OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT

OF MEASURE

E = mc2

E = mc

E = m

=

MJA

Dear MJA,

Your grouping of words really has a nice appearance.
Unfortunately, not everything that has a nice appearance is good, e.g. a sugar-coated rubbish.
On the top of your grouping are those not-yet-proven subjective claims.
Then followed by oversimpification, misleading steps, misused terminology, etc.

MJA, please stop abuse = with your confusive subjectivity.
Except other person's work [E=mc2], those ='s in your groupings are no longer normal, no longer mathematical, no longer meaningful.

In your trend of oversimplification: E=mc2; E=mc; E=m; =, it should be followed by nothingness.
Why now suddenly came an acronym MJA, does that means nothingness?!


Best Regards. Bottomlander

[Graybeard]

Originally Posted by MJA

Hi Greg, Sorry to answer your question with a question, but what don't you understand?

Well, first of all ...

Could you please stretch it to a paragraph for each step, not just a heading ?

I don't need a science book, just a few sentences for each heading. Pretend your child has just come home from school with this list of headings and the teacher has asked her/him to write a short explanation for each one. You don't want her/him to fail, how do you help ???

cool bananas ... greg