Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62

    Zero Dimensional Particles

    Zero Dimensional Particles (from now on I'll refer to them as ZDP) are NOT possible. Dimensionality is requiered for existence, both spatial and temporal. So particles can't exist if they are zero dimensional. Another failure in ZDPs is that scientists say they interact: photoelectric effect, electron transfer...etz. But this is not possible because 0 dim impplies no possibility of interaction. Or can something that doesn't occupy space crash with another non-occupying space thing? NO.

    What do you think?

    Do you know any other "proofs" that particles can't be zero dimensional?

  2. #2
    Banned subversion is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    562
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    I agree with you totally, a true zero dimensional object cannot interact with other particles because it has zero chance of actually running into and hitting them. It's just like you said. However, if Antonio is right in his concept of quantized space, and if I understand it correctly, perhaps it implies that there are not an infinite amount of places that a zero dimensional object can be in. This means that two zero dimensional objects could indeed end up at the same point in quantized space and thus cause a collision/interaction. Perhaps this means that the particles only appear to be zero dimensional in quantized space because the space is quantized to only such a finite degree. In continuous space, the particles are actually three dimensional.

    It is my opinion that zero dimensional particles are actually three dimensional, but infinitely small. Infinite here is only an effective, not an absolute term.

  3. #3
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by subversion
    It is my opinion that zero dimensional particles are actually three dimensional, but infinitely small. Infinite here is only an effective, not an absolute term.
    Let's say infinite meaning 10^-32. Atleast this is well established.

    And still, if Antonio is correct it is true that zero dimensional particls can exist, interact and move. But this is IFF his theory is correct, and this hasn't been agreed (either by toquest members or scientists).

  4. #4
    Blue Belt volantis is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    114
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 14x in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    26
    I agree with your observation that particles cannot have zero dimensions.
    Quote Originally Posted by <<>>
    Do you know any other "proofs" that particles can't be zero dimensional?
    I cannot prove that particles cannot have zero dimensions, but I can quantify the dimensions a particle has.

    Focusing on just the electron for the moment, Max Planck discovered the so-called "quantum of action," which is named for him. We call this quantum of action Planck's constant and it is notated as h (not h/2pi). There are only three objects in an atom that can qualify as something that can act, the electron, proton, and neutron. Since the proton and neutron are tightly bound, and because Planck's constant easily breaks down to the mass of the electron times the Compton wavelength times the speed of light, it is most likely that the "quantum of action" is the electron.

    To put it more clearly, Planck's constant IS the electron. The electron is therefore a two dimensional particle, having only two dimensions of length in its quantification. Further, the actual structure of a subatomic particle IS angular momentum. It is correct to say that the Moon HAS angular momentum around the Earth, but not only does the electron HAVE angular momentum, it IS angular momentum.

    Angular momentum can be modeled geometrically. There are several ways to do this, but only one fits with all the known facts concerning electrons. The subatomic particle is a line of mass moving sideways at the speed of light. The amount of mass is equal to the mass of the electron, the length of the line of mass is the Compton wavelength, and the velocity it is moving is the speed of light.

    In the Aether Physics Model this geometry looks like a helical tube. The helix part of the geometry is due to the effect of time on the structure and the tube surface is due to the effect of distributed length on the structure. To put this another way, the quantum electron not only has a quantum surface, but it also exists within a quantum unit of time. And to further deduce from this, time is a result of the nature of matter and does not exist separate from it.

  5. #5
    Green Belt yogi is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    66
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by subversion

    It is my opinion that zero dimensional particles are actually three dimensional, but infinitely small. Infinite here is only an effective, not an absolute term.
    i do agree with this and would like to add more to it. At other end of spectrum infinitely large and complex systems are beyond our logical understanding, but they still must exist. we are bound by 3 dimensions and have problems understanding and accepting 4th (time) let alone talking about N dimensions.

    sincerely,
    yogi


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Fundamental Particles
    By Guille in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-08-2008, 01:14 PM
  2. String Theory: Right or Wrong?
    By Guille in forum String Theory
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 11-05-2007, 04:36 PM
  3. The story about Existence born from Emptiness.
    By socratus in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-25-2006, 11:28 PM
  4. God, Particles and Antiparticles.
    By socratus in forum Intelligent Design
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-01-2006, 09:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top