It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Quantum Physics
Reload this Page "Bose-Einstein condensate: Same matter-different feeling."
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
"Bose-Einstein condensate: Same matter-different feeling."
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
2nd degree Black Belt
humanbydefault is on a distinguished roadhumanbydefault is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 18x in 14 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rep Power: 15
   
Post "Bose-Einstein condensate: Same matter-different feeling." - 10-22-2005, 10:27 AM

“BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATE: ANOTHER ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MY ATOMIC MODEL.”


“Our observation of nature must be diligent, our reflection profound, and our experiments exact. We rarely see these three means combined; and for this reason, creative geniuses are not common.” [Denis Diderot]
One introductory word before we get into a highly demanding imaginative exercise:
To make things easier for you in the understanding of what I’m going to “prove” [in theoretical terms naturally] I strongly suggest you to read [and if you already has it then go back and revise once again] my article “Rediscovering the atomic model (part II). It is imperative the understanding of harmonics and their [theoretical “infinite] projection in space.
It’s origin.
The original work of an Indian physicist named Satyendra Nath Bose and the later participation of Einstein in the expanding of his original calculations favored the prediction of what we call today “BEC.”
The original view of the phenomenon was that if few atoms ware cooled to very low temperatures [a few millionth of as a degree above absolute temperature] we would see no difference in their behavior as independent atoms, instead we would see them acting as one. In other words, the vibrations observed between them will cease to exist once heat was removed from the equation.
I don’t want you to get confuse with what I’m going to say next so read it slowly as I’ll try to write it at the same speed. Since back then Einstein and Bose merely spoke about stopping the chaotic movement between atoms of the batch [molecules], many other interpretations have been included into the original arguments. Such interpretation is that all the atoms in the batch will acquire the exact same quantum mechanical characteristics. This specific detail will be discussed later on in this article so let’s continue with the mysterious anomaly.
In 1997 [after a series of previous experiments done in the field] three physicists, Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji and William Phillips were awarded with the Noble Prize in physics for the develop of a technique to obtain a BEC.
I will resume what I read in the book titled ‘Recent advances and issues in physics’ written by David E. Newton. [Mr. Newton had received a doctorate in science education from Harvard University].
According to his article, atoms in the batch were cooled as they were “bombarded” with laser beams. So far so good! Now this is the part I want you to pay close attention to, I quote:

“A laser beam consists of photons that, because of their motion, have a certain momentum. When a photon strikes an atom, it transfers some of that momentum to the atom. If the photon and atom are traveling in the same direction, the collision increases the speed of the atom. If the photon collides with the atom head-on, it decreases (slows down) the speed of the atom.” [End of quote].

Can you see the NEWTONIAN-“macro-world”-like-absurd type of ANALOGY written here?
Could you make a different between this sort of discussion and the one [highly criticized by me] in “Rediscovering the atomic model (part III) when I revisited the Compton effect?
Is this kind of argument a true quantum mechanical one?
The so-called vibration between atoms and molecules of different atoms is the result of HARMONICS well beyond “electronic orbital”! Since I described quarks, protons and electrons as spinning harmonics with a same origin [I don’t recall ever putting an “end” to those energy projections beyond electronic levels]. A similar dichotomy is observed in the spectrum of the hydrogen atom. The energy levels get closer together as we get far away from the so-called “ground state” but it never touch each other. I don’t know if you are able to see the “connection” between the nature of “tunneling” (as I had previously depicted) with the origin of those “far-projective harmonics.” Anyway! Atoms find a clever way to assume their lower energy state while trying to achieve couplings with neighboring atoms, an issue we all know about. But the true reason of those “vibrations” is hidden in the imbalance between lower energy harmonics moving across atoms in the coupling in higher radius. It’s pretty easy to see, let me try again! We know that the bonding between atoms occurs between couplings within the SCALE of “electrons.” If we assumed the existence of yet another SCALE that spreads way further than those “electronic harmonics” then, what would be the result of such confrontation?
Obviously an overlapping of energies existing in two different SCALES will take place in both bonded atoms as a result. It is this anomaly and not an [unexplained] alleged “dynamic energy,” what’s responsible for those vibrations. Phonons are the direct product of those overlapping harmonics occurring between atoms and the corresponding “modulation” of heat taking place inside them.
THIS IS LADIES AND GENTLEMEN A QUANTUM MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF REALITY!
It wasn’t a series of “head-on” collisions what eventually “stopped” the process of vibrations between them, but the absorption of E-M energy from the photons traveling on the laser beam what finally did it. As E-M energy from those photons was taking place inside those harmonics, both HEAT and MASS were replaced by ENERGY. Atoms were obtaining an external ENERGY that would eventually render unnecessary further couplings between them. Since the ENERGY of laser photons is one and the same, every atom participant of the batch was assuming the same quantum mechanical characteristics.
Allow me to quote again the author’s words to make you see my point:

“… In addition, each laser was “tuned” to the frequency of the atoms in the sample. That is, the frequency at which an atom was traveling was exactly matched by the frequency of the laser beam. In this way, the atom absorbed all the energy carried by the laser beam, causing it to slow down as efficiently as possible.” [End of quotation].

SEE IT? 40-millionth of a degree above zero was obtained just with laser cooling alone! Heat as mass are part of MATTER as the only way “available” for ENERGY in the avoidance of the PERFECT VACUUM.
If they managed to substitute ENERGY for the spinning MASS AND HEAT present in the coupling, a new form of MATTER [never seen on Earth before] will be artificially created! However, the universe was not cheated this time either. The RULE was never violated! The perfect VACUUM was never reached!
When I speak about the perfect vacuum I’m referring to a place in space where absolutely no ENERGY, MASS or HEAT (in any possible manifestation of them) ought to be present. BEC is the achievement of an atomic structure with the absence of MASS AND HEAT inside it. A great experimental result followed by a gross theoretical misunderstanding.


HUMANBYDEFAULT

www.humanbydefault.com
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Maybe an empty mind is the Perfect-Vacuum!
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Maybe an empty mind is the Perfect-Vacuum! - 10-22-2005, 11:04 AM

H.B.D. very interesting post,I have much respect for Einstein,and his brilliant ideas,A thought occured to me when considering the Perfect-vacuum,could this
also be explained as an empty-mind,an empty-mind could be the perfect vacuum
a mind without intention present! And the absence of any ideation!I know we differ in our understanding of how it is,for me all is Mind,and the universe is a product of thought.Just thought though that I would say thanks for your post.



kind regards michael.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
2nd degree Black Belt
humanbydefault is on a distinguished roadhumanbydefault is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 18x in 14 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rep Power: 15
   
Question 11-28-2005, 11:42 AM

INDEX OF MY WORK

”Is Quantum Tunneling what “they” claim it to be?”
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1064

Spin... Spin ... You little electron!”
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1045

OOPS! As many electrons as it takes! Right professor?
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1039

Imagination”
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=925

Looking for The Wrong Particle at The Wrong Place”
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=969

Bose-Einstein Condensate: same matter-different feeling.”
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=990

A theoretical CLEAN-UP in DIRTY PHYSICS.”
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=949

"REDISCOVERING THE ATOMIC MODEL" [Part three]
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=937

"REDISCOVERING THE ATOMIC MODEL" [Part two]
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=824

"REDISCOVERING THE ATOMIC MODEL" [Part one]
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=823

The Young's Experiment
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=798

"Between the devil and the deep blue sea"
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=764

Alien Harmonics versus Quantum Mechanics
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=805

Living in the Stone Age of Humanity: The Year 2005
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=810

Popcorn Literature”… Not Any More!
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=814
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time DHiMac Time Travel 365 05-29-2008 05:51 AM
Singularity As Separate Entity Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 11 02-08-2008 12:15 PM
Gravity and space zeroca Forces of Nature 65 06-17-2007 12:26 AM
Simply, Everything Scoopcone TOE Theory Articles 13 12-27-2005 11:32 AM
The Shape of the Universe Mohsen Cosmology Articles 2 05-26-2005 01:19 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com