Blackholes....

[michellemfry]

I can proof this Theory through mathematical calculation..........................

1. Universe is expanding through some layers in loop system and Chasing to Singularity.
2. Particles were transferred in layers with different forces from Eminent Energy.
3. All material objects in universe are sharing with Constant forces in loop from *Eminent Energy.

ĝ = €p/ã E=MC2

(Here * Eminent Energy is without calculation of space & time, matter, particles and forces, just like Singularity)

I thought In Black Holes contains only Tinny particles (we can not see to this particles and can not share gravitation, electromagnetic force, and two nucleus forces). We can not measure particles through mass and gravity (this particles very very little)

Above definitions would be definitely possible explaining to the Black holes.

For Example we assume, one object (material) goes to inside the Black hole, that particular object will take from black hole after few year latter, that object may not change life (never died and never alive) and object may be collapsed during time of black hole. Because Black hole can not be contained Layers (can not share or divide any forces like Gravitation, Electromagnetic force and Two Nucleus forces from *Eminent Energy) and cannot transfer particles. There is no nucleus work inside the black hole. Our Total System Mater and Light are first layer in our universe (this contain atoms and photon), Subatomic particles(electrons, photons and neutrons) are second layer and quarks (other elements) are third layer and so many layers are there, these layers are expanding through different Forces. Mater and particles are moving own layer or circle because they have own property, own gravitation and own forces. Black hole is not be contained some layers, It may not be sharing forces. These things will success we are able to explain through Unified field Theorem.
Today everybody considered Electron is single, it isn't a single, Electron was made of tiny particles (these particles are produced from nucleus, form of particles is wave, wave is nothing here electron) and its moving own layer, that's why We can't see electron moving one orbit to another orbit.
Please your opinions send to danasurya_r@yahoo.com
Sincerely,
Danasurya

And Chasing to Singularity...
The Phenomenon of Chasing...i.e.vision based on motion and following motion is old, prehistoric even, and is now part of electronic gadgetry. If it moves, then photograph it, right. CCD charge coupled devices run on these things I believe. But what of these infuriating particles that do not interact with anything, have no mass, steal energy, have no charge, how are we supposed to get the picture, get the picture? I want to scream sometimes.
If I get my vision from motion first and then from something else second, wouldn't I get an entirely different picture. If I got my vision from the matter as it was coming from aether chased into being from the singularity at the other end of the creation. The singularity threatened all of creation and the laws of physics broke down.
That's enough horror story for one day. I can't look down that way too long. We were all there at one time you know. We just can't face it. Some day we will put it all back together and put it in a little book fit for children and adults of all ages and all languages, no religions allowed.

[Tesla]

Please do correct me if I am wrong. I think the term blackhole is confusing because it's not a hole at all. It's just a super dense spec. I would think an atom (and whatever else it 'eats') is used up as fuel and whatever remains is 'excreted' as Hawking radiation.

Thanks.

[michellemfry]

A question was raised about the fitness of the term blackhole. It is a place into which an endless amount of matter can be fit and yet find no increase in size to be found ever, given it's capacity for giving in to infinite gravitational forces generated about the circular structure formed at the center of motion such as the galaxy at hand and the one it is destined to collide with. The circle forms from the addition of gravitational forces that add up and up and up without benefit of leaving the vicinity. Black hole was first taken to be a slur in French circles, and ignored elsewhere, but a hole is something into which you can insert things, black is a perfect absorber of sorts, so the composition of a perfect absorber of matter into a place that becomes a circle of great mass and small area which makes it extremely efficient at hiding lots of stuff in a small space. If I were trying to hide gobs and gobs of stuff for eons and eons, a black hole would be perfect solution to a huge problem.
What is a galaxy to do with all the data points that point to a certain place as the center of the universe that does not exist yet, or it's fate is not yet determined by NASA, so the center must be hidden from view, or imagined to be covered up till NASA makes up it's mind about things once and for all.
The center, the circle perfect and round in an elliptical world is a wonderful object. It can be found to give the value of pie by estimate or by program to many, many digits.
The galaxy formation that centered the Universe One, the One that was trying to be a peaceful thing, a serious thing, a prosperous thing, just could not survive forever unchanged in a world where change is the photon defined. Change and differentiation and mapping the changes was everything to the science, and you proposed that the universe cease to change and end all that wonderful stuff because it felt anchored to a place somewhere, someplace, sometime, somehow, someway.
To which I say to the Almighty, And...without question, at all.

[michellemfry]

Death is predicted for anything that enters the blackhole, so one is led to the conception of the antithesis, which is the theory anti-theory pair that can be encountered.
Thesis is presented in an effort to contribute to the process by giving a statement of fact that describes your theory and obsevations.
Anti-thesis presents itself as well. This is the force of will upon action that moves all proofs and the one that survives is the accepted place that one will always use to build, where none is there, and to conceive of what all else denies is the only way to be allowed to form your thoughts without the sudden loss of one's....

[michellemfry]

Stephen Hawking has never spoken to anyone. His computer has. He tells it what to say. When you read his stuff, you are talking to him.
Who have you been admiring in the Chair of Newton with the mathematical hold on the scientific community? While a disease ate away at his daily motion, he began to speak of these vague, might exist things somewhere out in space, and began to look. We listened and accepted the thermodynamic and entropic way he thought them to behave from Earth while they were somewhere out there. They would be small, dense, etc, emit particles and radiate away over time and disappear, so not to be changed at all by the whole idea.
Convenient, convenient, centers of galaxies that we would never know the effects of, and masses gobbled up in rates FAST and faster. Never be affected! What are you, a singularity waiting to happen in some alternate universe. Hello!
The only possible explanation is that the genetic abnormality that Hawking had allowed him to excel in mathematical dimensions that applied to the hole and gave him the information that the holes never yield. Giving him the ability to probe the hole while the hole withheld all information from being taken off the spacepoint. A hole penetrated by a man on Earth with intellect alone, no spacecraft, no NASA, nothing.

[protheory]

This is what I think about the concept of Black Holes

Black Holes

Introduction

This theory describes regions in space where the nucleus of a star is thought to have collapsed into itself due to its own gravitational pull.

The current laws of physics have no theory that can accurately describe the complete behaviour of these places.

Specialised

Black holes are thought to be specialised regions in space where the attractive pull of gravity is so strong that not even light can escape.

Fastest

Light is the fastest energy in the universe according to the accepted laws of physics.

Critical

If a stellar core reaches a certain critical mass it is assumed that it may be able to collapse into itself, creating a gravitational pull that is stronger than that of electromagnetic radiation, such as light.

Black

The name given to these regions is black hole with the implication being that there is no light able to function as it might normally do.

Pulled

It is assumed that light and everything else within range of the event horizon is pulled into the hole, due to the strength of the surrounding gravitational field.

Horizon

The event horizon is the point in space-time up to which the pull of gravity is stronger than light, from a physics point of view this is considered to be the point of no return.

Laws

The laws of physics break down if we try to calculate beyond this stage and this is the problem.

Summary

What happens inside a black hole?

Why do the laws of physics fail to accurately describe and explain these phenomena?

The Problem

What are black holes and why do the current laws of physics fail to explain them?

The Answer

Opposites

Black holes are the opposite to explosions, they are implosions.

Potentials

The mass or potential energy contained in any stellar core is subject to three possible potentials at the end of its life.

Stellar

Any stellar core may explode, implode, or a neutral potential may occur.

Physics

The current laws of physics cannot describe the idea of a black hole because they rely on unchanging constants such as the speed of light for relative measurement.

Theoretically

Black holes are theoretically more powerful than light.

Measurement

When we attempt to measure the universe using the unchanging speed of light as a constant, our observations and relative measurements are only unchanging as long as this constant itself remains unchanging.

Trouble

The moment that our constant base ceases to be constant, the singular laws of physics fail (change).

Stronger

When we encounter a black hole that is theoretically more powerful than light our relative laws cannot cope as light is no longer what we assumed it was.

Undone

Everything we have based upon the constant value of light is now undone.

Constants

The laws of physics are not necessarily unchanging constants and should not be regarded as such.

Can we explain black holes with the current laws of physics?

1. We can explain black holes with the current laws of physics.

2. We cannot explain black holes with the current laws of physics.

3. There is a neutral possibility.

Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?

I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

My point is literal.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn't work.

This is just what I think about the term Black Holes, all I'm suggesting is that if we were to assume a singularity within these regions, what about the possible opposite and neutral potentials within the proposed singularity?

I respect Stephen Hawking a great deal for his dedication to physical phenomena but I still think that he's not exactly on the right track.

What do you think about it all?

PRO