Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Grandmaster RascalPuff is a glorious beacon of light RascalPuff is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,088
    Blog Entries
    130
    Thanks Given
    1,660
    Thanked 858x in 482 Posts
    Rep Power
    42

    Awards Showcase

    Outstanding in Relatively Well Grounded - Large & Small - Fields

    Well Grounded - Alternate - Perspectives


    Copyright 1977 United Feature Syndicate Inc.

    Sometimes charges attract, and sometimes they repel.

    Newton allows that gravity may be an impelling - or a repelling - force.
    (What this record calls, 'The - Newton's - gravitational alternative').

    Einstein says gravity is - at least sometimes - a repelling force; adding furthermore that gravity may be both a repelling and an impelling force.
    Truly Yours tends to observe that gravity is usually an inertially mechanical repelling force, on or near major gravitational masses, and an electromagnetic impelling (aquatic, terrestrial and atomospheric) tidal force (for example) at greater distances. Summarizing that, since Newton introduced what he fully acknowledged as a mysterious, occult force of gravitation, usually - but not stringently - to be thought of as an impelling force, this record sees no reason why Einstein is disallowed from introducing a repelling force (Cosmological Constant, Lambda - /\ ) acting parallel to Newton's impelling force... Summing up a tandem repelling and impelling force, with each man offering major contributions to understanding the universe; neither of which men - or forces - are mutually exclusive.

    The apparent dilemma of generally macrocosmic gravity has a counterpart dilemma in the microcosms.

    Namely, the superfluously conflicting schools of thought (Circa 1900 thru 1930 and ever since) on Max Planck's - Helmholtz inspired, Rubens confirmed - Quantum Mechanics'.

    The 1897 dated observation of black body radiation led Planck to attempt to observe an invariable increase in entropy, which resulted in null thought and laboratory experiments; leading to Planck's 1900 revision of Boltzmann's alternately continuous and discontinuous statistical interpretaton of the 2nd law of thermodynamics (later paralleled by Heisenberg's Principle of Indeterminacy).

    It is only obscurely known or recognized that, although there are indeed opposing - J.J. Thompson-electron-launched - arguments on this subject, Einstein and Planck were in the same camp, along with Schroedinger, regarding the much misunderstood 'problem' of microcosmic 'continuity' of wave-field theory, and 'discontinuity' of so called 'particles'.

    Leading to an undrained, ever rising swamp of determinacy and indeterminacy, entanglement, water ripple and shotgun pellets rolling sideways and speeding linearly through vertical and horizontal slits, in the ever imposing shadow of assumptive continuous wave eclipsed by the non-prevailing 'ultraviolet catastrophe' and the newly incumbent black body radiation - vocabularized in electrical theory and thermodynamics - introducing the circle of broken lines forming a sought-after curve but still leading to an apparently non discardable discontinuous 'quantum leap', because energy in discontinuous portions cannot be infinitely divided; establishing that radiant energy is not quantitatively infinite - in unequal units, Planck resolved that the frequency of the considered discontinuous wave is directly related to its duration, or more specifically, its length.

    This was unexpected because it defined a seemingly antithetical, self contradicting equality in discontinuous and continuous energy packets - 'quantum', which, literally translated from Latin equals 'what quantity'. It came to pass that, depending on how these units are measured and otherwise evaluated, they alternately manifest as 'waves', and, as 'particles' - continuity, and discontinuity.
    From this arose a further quandary of defining the dynamics of what was projected, compared to the method or conditions of projection.

    (Among other difficulties, the observer began to interfere with the observation...)

    Quantum Mechanics (perhaps better understood as 'quantum dynamics') was not altogether contradictory to the - at that time, much established continuous wave theory - which was often confirmed in delicate laboratory observations as well as more pedestrian observations such as the often exemplified fact that a swinging pendulum loses its momentum in a continuous declination of kinetic energy. Quantum Mechanics contests this.
    Black body radiation occurs in discontinuous packages of microcosmically indivisible energy units of erg seconds, where the individual, indivisible unit is designated as 'h', for the numerically expressed value of:
    .0000000000000000000000000066, or, 6,6 x 1027


    Establishing that ordinary sizes as perceived by human observers were not the end measure of what was occuring in the much smaller realms of physicality and dynamics.
    Max Planck had not excluded the previous standards of observation and measurement, whereas, he certainly had established that the characteristics of the larger physical world were not aligned with those of the smaller physical world, and that the Latin statement, ut infra, ut supra and conversely ('as above, so below'), was a generalisation but not a law.


    Atomic (microcosmic) physics was understood to be in its early stages and the Planck dynamics were a portention that many other unexpected discoveries were due, as the science of observing and measuring microcosmic reality progressed - the evolutions of which were alternately championed and challenged, by Planck, Rutherford, Einstein, Bohr, Shroedinger, with many others time and space does not allot for, in the (abbeviated) format of this dissertation. Having traversed a modest historical circuit, encompassing what are apparently conjunctive (interconnected) solutions and enigmas of large and small issues.


    The information posted here is to introduce a relatively well grounded introduction to a tentatively well established work-in-progress, at http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinstenGroupie.

    Best regards,
    - RP


    (George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

    "All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
    "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
    "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid

  2. #2
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: Outstanding in Relatively Well Grounded - Large & Small - Fields

    Thanks rascal,the most reliable field I know to play on is the etheric one.






    regards michael.
    Last edited by mkirkpatrick; 09-22-2007 at 08:04 PM. Reason: spacing.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top