C squared

[Profpat]

Hi MJA;

C2 is light going out omnidirectional.
When mass is converted to energy it goes out in all directions at the speed of light.

The variable in E=mc2 is the mass. More mass, more energy, a larger area of energy.

So once again I view c to be the radius and c2 to be the area affected by the massive dispersion.

Otherwise I'm with you and don't have the slightest idea.
Maybe Lloyd could help you here.

Best to you,

Pat

[MJA]

Thanks Pat,

So the mass of a dust particle times the speed of light times the speed of light equals Energy? Or 1 miiigram x 34,596,000,000 miles per second = E. Numerically how do you multiply milligrams times 34.596 billion miles per second to determine the numericle equivelant of E. Is that Newton's calculus? And is that incomprehensible number the reason or energy required, or cause for me to sneeze? Just thinkin about it made me sneeze.

=
MJA

[Profpat]

Well God bless you MJA.

Is what you wrote equal? Truly equal?

Best to you.

Pat

[MJA]

Well God bless you MJA.

Is what you wrote equal? Truly equal?

Best to you.

Pat

I think measure is the proverbial fly in the ointment, or the dust particles obscuring the truth; isn't it obvious Pat?

Best to you to,

=
MJA

[Profpat]

LOL MJA;

You are on your own. My theory that energy is a 2 dimensional reality, and that c is describing distance, or the radius, is just that a theory. Great question as to how long is c.

Best to you,

Pat

[everymansmedium]

Hello Lloyd responding to #4
All the forms of energy function within at least 4 dimentions. Nothing moves in space without time.
John.

[MJA]

Time, like any other measure is only relatative, uncertain, and non-absolute.
Does anyone disagree with relativity?
And of what in the universe is void of motion, that we can use as a measuring rod or coordanate system to measure motion with certainty?
What is the tool of certainty that can measure anything with certainty?
What is the true foundation of measure?
I know!

=
MJA

[everymansmedium]

MJA # 17
Hello:
Time, like any other measure is only relative, uncertain, and non-absolute………………. (I agree!)
Does anyone disagree with relativity? ……………………………………………………… (Not Me!)
And of what in the universe is void of motion, that we can use as a measuring rod or coordinate system to measure motion with certainty? ………………………………………………… (Nothing I know of!)
What is the tool of certainty that can measure anything with certainty?…….. (Only in relative scales.)
What is the true foundation of measure?…………………………………………………… (relativity.)


However all that said. All motion is defined by time. Relative to time if you wish.
Still if, Time = 0 Motion = 0 Space is solid and impenetrable if there is no time.
Your body can still exist within space but it would be as a mannequin nothing more than an empty doll. All being is gone as soon as time is gone. No time. No motion. No being.
I only know of two certainties. ((( I AM))) and (((TIME))). Even the concept of I AM requires time.
John.

[Profpat]

Hi to all,

John when I tranced myself to the " I AM " level, there was no sense of time, no sense of motion, no space, Only an awareness, that was beyond time, space and motion, an awarenass that all is illusion.

Best,

Pat

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Prof, think about it for a second___How can you have anything real, except drawings and abstract ideas, unless it has 3D extension...? Even a sheet of the thinnest paper and ink drawing, truly has 3D extension. How could a wave be real, or have any real effect, if it be only 2D...? IMO, it can't... That's why it's always easier to see energy/waves as real matter waves, which they truly are... Just as Dave has stated, "All is matter in a void", and we, or our instruments, can see nothing but 3D extension...

Lloyd

Thanks for all the references Lloyd.

I think energy is 2 dimensional, sorry.
What is the distinction between matter and energy?[Densities...!!!]
One is in one form mass 3 dimensional,that mass gets converted to energy 2 dimensional, the other form.[Wrong___It's always 3D. 3D matter/mass is converted through mass entropy to lesser densities of 3D matter/wave/energies___always. I can't help it if standard physics got it wrong. Look for some of the faults in the linguistics of "matter" and "energy."]

The reason for the heat is that the energy is reacting with the mass. No mass no heat.[True enough, but lesser densities of entropicized mass, is the same as what is commonly referred to as "energy."]

Best to you,

Pat