C squared

[spacedout]

Yes -- there are two ways of assuming how movement occurs. A motion projector shows a whole picture in frames while a television shows a point quantum leap to make a picture. I'm assuming that our system is like a television - but in 3 dimensions or x,y,z steps. All movement in time is a repeating step along a time-line. Three dimensions are x,y,z groups that simulate a 3-dimensional coordinate system --- note that this works.

The other approach is to assume that everything in the univers works independantly. No reason for the fact that there is a Planck unit of time and distance or that particles throughout the universe have standard size and mass such as a photon or electron. A graviton is just a particle that can't be broken down and all particles just come that way. I prefer the stepped system because it answers the questions in a rational way.

To test my theory against E = MC^2 to see if there is hidden variables is important. There has been experiment in which light was emmitted into a vacuum chamber and light was absorbed at absolute zero in a cloud of sodium vapor and the beam was frozen in the sodium vapor. A lazor beam then kicked the frozen beam out of the sodium vapor and it traveled a distance through the chamber and into another spot with sodium vapor and was captured again. The speed of light traveling beteen the two sodium cloud was 26 mi/hr. The energy it had was far less that light traveling at speed C. I believe this experiment can show if there is a variable in the equation E = MC^2 conferming what I have said. If C = 1/p and squaring this gives energy as 1/p^2 in which p^2 = E it should show up in the frozen light experiment. If it does my assumptions about quantum steps is right if not it is wrong.

[spacedout]

A problem I have with my concept is that to make a ccwp in a photon travel slower the ccwp must increase in energy (each chain of the ccwp must be longer) but a Planck volume of space contains an abolute energy according to the value of compaction of the time-lin. Therefor fewer ccwp's would be in a photon. Anyway, there is a way to defeat my theory.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Yes -- there are two ways of assuming how movement occurs. A motion projector shows a whole picture in frames while a television shows a point quantum leap to make a picture. I'm assuming that our system is like a television - but in 3 dimensions or x,y,z steps. All movement in time is a repeating step along a time-line. Three dimensions are x,y,z groups that simulate a 3-dimensional coordinate system --- note that this works.

The other approach is to assume that everything in the univers works independantly. No reason for the fact that there is a Planck unit of time and distance or that particles throughout the universe have standard size and mass such as a photon or electron. A graviton is just a particle that can't be broken down and all particles just come that way. I prefer the stepped system because it answers the questions in a rational way.

To test my theory against E = MC^2 to see if there is hidden variables is important. There has been experiment in which light was emmitted into a vacuum chamber and light was absorbed at absolute zero in a cloud of sodium vapor and the beam was frozen in the sodium vapor. A lazor beam then kicked the frozen beam out of the sodium vapor and it traveled a distance through the chamber and into another spot with sodium vapor and was captured again. The speed of light traveling beteen the two sodium cloud was 26 mi/hr. The energy it had was far less that light traveling at speed C.

You see, right here is where you are making your mistake, as the laws of conservation and angular momentum absolutely require c to be absolute__it never loses its energy capacity, due to the fact when the sodium atoms absorb the light at reduced linear velocities, c must equalize its energy state by increasing in spin c states. c is always absolute c in all states__All__either linear, spin or frequencies of... This is the hardest concept to get through one's mind, but when you do, you easily understand QM and Lene Hau's light slowing, stopping and starting experiments... c's energy potential must always be conserved for QM or RM to function...

I believe this experiment can show if there is a variable in the equation E = MC^2 conferming what I have said.

The variables are linear motion, spin velocities and frequency velocities__where group c's always adds to c...

If C = 1/p and squaring this gives energy as 1/p^2 in which p^2 = E it should show up in the frozen light experiment. If it does my assumptions about quantum steps is right if not it is wrong.

Seeing through the above information should enlighten you to the velocity of absolute c__or Va = Vu + Vr... a = absolute motion(total); u = uniform motion(spin and linear); r = random motion(frequencies, amplitudes, wave lengths)...

[spacedout]

Thanks Lloyd --- The question is what is the medium for the spin made of. Fluid dynamics shows how spin can behave and makes the argument for spin energy as a (more) vector directioual movement and as a stationary spinning movement -- I have this in my theory also. However, I believe that all movement is linear and the three dimensions x,y,z are (identity)groups in which a step across an Einstein time-line continuum can be added or subtracted from one of the three groups and this simulates 3-D.

The above states that a wave traveling through a medium o twisted chains will propagate in only the x or y or z coordinate of space. Then how can diagonal movement occur traveling in all directions at the speed of light. Only the Pythagorean theorm can do this D = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)1/2. It's easy to see that a wave traveling in the x-direction would propagate between y and z chains and the wave would be funneled into a wave particle. Of course the wave must occur by chance as random movement is transformed into vector movement.
When this happens two particles are created -- a vacuum particle in which chain segments fall into the void and the void particle moves in one direction while a pressure particle moves
in the opposite direction.

All of space will be filled with these chance particles which after a short time dissappear into the random aether chain. It's obvious that larger stacked chains or longer chains will have difficulty propagating and in-line identity transfers will occur more often freezing movement or slowing it down (mass). The speed of a chain is inversly proportional to the number of directionaly orientated chains -- S = 1/p. Due to the crossing of chains there will be rows in which rows = number of steps in a chain of a crossed chain wave particle. The total energy in a crossed chain wave particle would therefore be the number of steps it has and rows X steps/row = P^2.

To get the value of energy, S must be squared -- S^2 = 1/p^2. Note that p^2 is e or the energy of a ccwp that travels at the speed of light and is an average of all the possible p^2 ccwp's in a Planck volume. From this the Pythagorean formula for diagonals comes into play s = (x^2 +y^2 + z^2)1/2 -- if x = the distance 3 and y = the distance 4 and if z = zero the actual diagonal distance will be 5 (the speed of light in any direction). It comes together neatly.

The stepped system is so simple that anyone can understand it. It shows that c^2 is not = to energy but is equal to 1/e --- E in Einstein's E = MC^2 and E = 1/e. This shows a hidden variable in Einstein's formula. When taking the speed of light and graphing it to energy it is a direct conversion C^2 and of course you wouldn't know any difference because C^2 is an average sized ccwp that makes a photon and is constant.

[greenbug]

From what I read and how I understood it.. Einstein knew energy was mass at a speed around the speed of light.

Yet there was a sort of dilemma about just how fast, or how much faster an exchange of interacting masses would change this developing equation.

So Einstein decided to square it as such a large number would certainly be an impossibility and cover all possible ranges in which the reaction of mass would create energy.

Even though c^2 is fictitious what it represents is an a range or realm of acceleration of mass into energy. I don't think Einstein was sure as to just how the interactions would play out given that in differing frames of reference, although the energy is there for the mass, the interaction might be, to an observer, past c+1..

That is if you were observing an interaction, your frame of reference might differ to the point of what your observing might might be, an action of c+1 and yet energy would not be the result. This is where an observer changes the out come by observing because any other instance not being observed at c+1 would certainly cerate energy. What changes the matrix is your relation to the event. Any relation attracted to an event changes that event, because now the event is related to another set of numbers. Each point in space can only relate so much information and when that information is divided it changes just how it interacts with what it was related to, to begin with.

any how that kinda how I see it...