[MJA]

If it is true that C or the speed of light has a speed limit of 299792458 metres per second, and nothing is faster than light; then C squared or light speed squared, cannot exist, in nature or in an equation of nature.
Then E=mc squared is not correct, is it?

=
MJA

[Lloyd Gillespie]

It's the mathematics of how matter/light functions, not the actual speed of light. E=MC^2 was proved correct by Lisa Meitner, back in the `40's, when she split the u-235 atom... The math works, MJA, and nothing needs exceed the speed of light, for it to work. You better do some studying...

Lloyd

Originally Posted by MJA If it is true that C or the speed of light has a speed limit of 299792458 metres per second, and nothing is faster than light; then C squared or light speed squared, cannot exist, in nature or in an equation of nature. Then E=mc squared is not correct, is it? = MJA

[Profpat]

I comprehended the formula to be descriptive of 2 dimensional reality.

In other words mass is 3 dimensional, and when its converted to energy it becomes 2 dimensional energy, like the 2 dimensional transverse light wave.
The c is the radius,and c2 is area.

just my thought,

Pat

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Not quite, as energy is also three dimensional... Does not heat fill three D spaces...?

Lloyd

Originally Posted by Profpat I comprehended the formula to be descriptive of 2 dimensional reality. In other words mass is 3 dimensional, and when its converted to energy it becomes 2 dimensional energy, like the 2 dimensional transverse light wave. The c is the radius,and c2 is area. just my thought, Pat

[Profpat]

So light is a 3 dimensional transverse wave?

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Originally Posted by Profpat So light is a 3 dimensional transverse wave?

When you study it deep enough, it certainly is___Matter/energy, ain't it...? Check out micro-waves, the longest wave, yet the least active, until excited. They cook our meat all the way through, from the inside out___How...? Go back to Huygens' original work on wave theory, for the most fundamental physics. Also check out Josiah Gibbs, the original inventor of vector math, used by Maxwell's em-wave theories and ideas, or Planck and
Bohr... Much has been exaggerated in recent literature... Carver Mead, at Intel, is the best modern source... He has a new book out, can't remember the name, but is about the wave theories of light and electricity, and the government gives him huge grants, to further his most advanced wave/particle ideas and experiments, and real physical advances, while still working for Intel...

Lloyd

[Profpat]

Thanks for all the references Lloyd.

I think energy is 2 dimensional, sorry.
What is the distinction between matter and energy?
One is in one form mass 3 dimensional,that mass gets converted to energy 2 dimensional, the other form.

The reason for the heat is that the energy is reacting with the mass. No mass no heat.

Best to you,

Pat

[MJA]

I am doing my own work on this question, and appreciate any help. To simplify the original question I would state: If CC does not exist in nature, than it cannot be used in the equation (E=mcc) to define or equate energy. T or F?

Thanks,

=
MJA

[Profpat]

Hi MJA;

C squared does exist in nature, if it did not then the answer to your double negative worded statement would be true.

Best to all,

Pat

[MJA]

Thanks Pat,

Where in nature is the speed of light times the speed of light?
Energy?
Then energy is mcc?
Then energy is mass times C squared faster than C?
And energy is faster than light?
Is that it?
Was Einstein right?

=
MJA