ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Blue Belt

davidgow77's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107
17 davidgow77 will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-08-2005, 09:32 AM
Red face

These are just examples, though. If your theory tells you something else then focus on that.... it may just be a matter of time before you discover the other things.


DG
Reply With Quote
davidgow77 is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-08-2005, 02:19 PM
another explanation of why the location or position of a photon is indeterminable is that, between interactions with matter, it's in a state of higher dimension. Before it can interact with matter, it must adjust its dimension to match that of matter in order for interactions to be feasible at that particular level of existence.

when i was working on a quantum of mass, i was able to derive the universal constant of gravity from the values of Planck's constant, Planck length, and the speed of light in vacuum.

G=\frac{a^2c^3}{h}

where a is Planck length, c is speed of light, and h is Planck's constant. So in an earthlike planetary system with perpetual cloud cover, the constant of gravity can be possibly discovered after the discovery of electromagnetism and quantum theory. So that Maxwell and Planck came before Galileo, Kepler, and Newton.
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Blue Belt

Omni's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 105
20 Omni will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-08-2005, 02:20 PM
And the "light-question" from the first post...?
Reply With Quote
Omni is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-08-2005, 02:35 PM
when we measure distance, the measurement is based on the validity of the quadratic form similar to the Pythagorean theorem

a^{n}+b^{n}=c^{n}

when we measure the speed of light for n=2, we get ~300,000 km per second. But when n is less than 2, the distance is longer and when n is greater than 2, the distance is shorter. So the speed of light is different in different dimension of n.
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-08-2005, 02:57 PM
the variation of n in a^{n}+b^{n}=c^{n} seems to indicate that the Planck length is different for different dimension of spacetime.

when n=0, the Planck length is exactly 1.
when n=1, the Planck length is not known.
when n=2, the Planck legnth is 10^{-33} centimeter
when n=3, the Planck length is not known
when n=4, the Planck length is not known (maybe 300,000 kilometers?)
when n=5, the Planck length is not known but greater than n=4

Last edited by AntonioLao; 04-08-2005 at 03:03 PM. Reason: add length at 4D
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Blue Belt

davidgow77's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107
17 davidgow77 will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-09-2005, 10:52 AM
Post

Antoniolao, that is the most interesting post I have seen yet of this forum. Is there any way to calculate the planck length where n=6 and n=10?

Essentially I am trying to find out the rate of expansion of the early universe to find out whether there is any correlation bewteen it and the speed of light. I have worked out so far that the mean rate of expanision (if expansion has been constant since the time of creation) is 3.164010547^19 m per second. If the dimensions are linearly independant, then there can only be six, but I would also be curious to know n=10 as this is what string theorists are so adamant is the case.

DG
Reply With Quote
davidgow77 is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-09-2005, 05:42 PM
if we extrapolate from n=0, n=2, n=4, but the curve appears to be nonlinear or could be degree of polynomial is greater than 2 or 3 or 4?
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Orange Belt

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
9 HIGGSBOSONS is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-04-2006, 07:19 PM
Re: "Picking on Einstein" Article

I Have A Good Idea Why Time Slows Down In Frame Moving Approximately Equal To C. As We See The Result From Mass Variation That In Which Mass Increases With High Speed Its Mean Inertia Increases. Then In Clock Which Is Operated By Battery And Charge Flow From Battery To Clocks Machine. As Experiment Shows That Charge Is Invariant Under Hige Speeds. So Mass Of Whole Clock Increases With High Speed But That Charge Remains Same Which Applies Same Effort To Move Clocks Arms As It Apply At Rest. So Due To High Inertia Arms Move Slowly. But I Want To Ask One Question Is That How High Speed Effects The Biological Clock.
Reply With Quote
HIGGSBOSONS is offlineReport Post
Blue Belt

davidgow77's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107
17 davidgow77 will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-05-2006, 06:13 PM
Cool Re: "Picking on Einstein" Article

just in the name of "picking on Einstein", has anyone considered that the legitimacy of General Relativity hinges in the detection/observance of Stress-Energy Tensors. I reckon that these will never be found, and this would seem to infer that General Relativity is actually a theory of the mind.

If I've said this before on this thread, I apologise. I am too lazy to ge back and check.
Reply With Quote
davidgow77 is offlineReport Post
Master

michellemfry's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 620
18 michellemfry will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
07-07-2006, 01:33 AM
Wink Re: "Picking on Einstein" Article

Perfect Day
When you come to the end of a perfect day,
And you sit alone with your thoughts,
While the chimes ring out with a carol gay
For the joy that the day has brought;
Do you think what the end of a perfect day
Can mean to a tired heart,
When the sun goes down with a flaming ray
And the dear friends have to part?

By permission Carrie Jacobs Bond and Son, Chicago, ILL. Copyright, 1915.
__________________
Michelle
Reply With Quote
michellemfry is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Article Manager do you Prefer? Robert Polls 4 09-25-2005 10:52 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.