Speed of Light

[Guille]

the photon is considered as its own antiparticle. "anti" does not mean only opposite electric charge. The neutrinos have their antiparticles and neutrinos have no electric charges. But there are properties of weak charge and color charge and also helicity that can be used to differentiate particle and antiparticle.

is the graviton it's own antiparticle? or are the higgs 8antigravity)? and what is then the diff between gravitons and it's antiparticle?

[AntonioLao]

My own hypothesis is that the graviton is a one-sided closed surface with two holes analogous to the Klein's bottle, once get in can't get out but once get out can't get in. So, the anti-graviton is in one parallel universe and the graviton is in our universe. If one graviton moves closer to the gateway between universes then it is becoming more and more like a photon and when it meet the anti-graviton face-to-face then it become completely a photon. But when the graviton moves away from the gateway then it become more and more like a Higgs boson acquiring more and more mass as it moves farther and farther away from the gate of the true vacuum.

[Guille]

My own hypothesis is that the graviton is a one-sided closed surface with two holes analogous to the Klein's bottle, once get in can't get out but once get out can't get in. So, the anti-graviton is in one parallel universe and the graviton is in our universe. If one graviton moves closer to the gateway between universes then it is becoming more and more like a photon and when it meet the anti-graviton face-to-face then it become completely a photon. But when the graviton moves away from the gateway then it become more and more like a Higgs boson acquiring more and more mass as it moves farther and farther away from the gate of the true vacuum.

is there a joining point between both universes (it appears to be necesary)?

and one last thing, this suspiciously looks like my PhG process/effect.......
(just kidding)

[AntonioLao]

is there a joining point between both universes

There are infinite numbers of joining points. These comprise the entire vacuum field.

[subversion]

As a result of discussion on the "Picking on Einstein" Thread, who here thinks that super-luminal speeds (speeds faster than light) can be acheived.

Please give an explanation for your decision if possible.

"picking on einstein thread," ha ha, that's kinda funny
but speaking of which, the votes on this poll definitely contradict the votes on my poll. Oh well, that's just even more funny. hA HA HA A

[subversion]

do they then go back in time? I think I already wrote this, but, is gravity going back in time? I meant aht the gravity things create now, it is the gravity it will create in a millions or billlions of years?

actually, the gravity that we feel is forward in time to what we see, since light travels slower than gravity. But if we consider that time in our universe is actually running backwards, then you could say that gravity happens in the past of what we see (our future but actually the past). Kinda weird

[Guille]

subversion,


you have truth in your hands!

the actual problem is that nothing defines that we are going backwards or forwards, and we will probably never notice it, here I'm not looking at time as a dimension, but more as the motion of things. the universe could have started inmensily big (although for human logic and in life, it is ussually the other way round) and end up being a extremely small object becoming nothing at a point.

[centaurwind]

If information can be transfer through the entanglement of particles, maybe time travel can be achieve without a transport that can reach the light speed. The problem is: can entanglements happen between two particles located in different dimension?

[Guille]

centaurwind,

I think you don't need anyway particles of different number of dimensions.

Remember everybody. time travell is always happening. To us even. The only way to stop this is with absolute zero (and this is impossible)

[davidgow77]

no... Super luminal speeds would just need to be viewed as a complete lack of location (under Heisenbergs uncertainty principle), and should be veiwed as Tachyon teleportation or another such concept.

DG