Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Relativity
Reload this Page Speed of Light
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

View Poll Results: Are Super-Luminal speeds possible?
Yes 13 65.00%
No 7 35.00%
Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: Speed of Light
Old
  (#41 (permalink))
In Training
marksnl1 is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 4
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2006
Rep Power: 0
   
Re: Speed of Light - 07-10-2006, 11:51 AM

Hi Guille, thanx for your elaborate answer.
First of all, I do not necesarilly adhere to Barbour's theory. I just thought it shouldn't be left out of this discussion.
And I certainly do not deny the suffering of the Jewish people, or any people or for that matter any living creature whatsoever.

He seems to say that nothing "happens".
Everything that can happen exists in the form of a series of snapshots, as he puts it, of configurations (of particles) that together make up 'configuration space'. Each snapshot is here meant to be not a measure of time, but a unique configuration of, if I remember correctly, all particles that exist.

He states that what we percevieve as 'history' (say the history of an arrow being shot and reaching a target) is a path through a particular series of snapshots. Meaning, btw, that the arrow leaving the bow, is NOT the arrow hitting the target, they are two distinct objects. So, no movement, only configurations.
That would imply that the history of our world ( in the sense of everything around us we can experience, the universe and by proxie, its history) is also a particular path through configuration space. The overwhelming majority of configurations is too simple, meaningless or boring to be of interest here. But statistics dictates that a certain fraction would look like moments in time in wich we (eventually) exist. The sum of these snapshots is that particular path through configuration space, our world. Since there are very many paths, Barbours theory reminds one of the many worlds theories, it just explains it in a rather original way.

Now, the discussion here was superliminal speeds.
I would say there was a minimum measure in which snapshots can differ.
Hence, the impression of movement is also limited, namely to what we measure as the speed of light. Hence, no superluminal speeds.

I'm sorry for my amateurish explanation, but it's the best I can manage.
Also, again, I find Barbours thinking very interesting, but do not have the theoretical knowledge, nor am I smart enough to be able to say that I adhere to it.
Mark
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Speed of Light
Old
  (#42 (permalink))
Yellow Belt
bsaucer is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 16
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rep Power: 0
   
Re: Speed of Light - 07-07-2008, 04:15 PM

Yes... I've heard rumors that neutrinos are superluminal, having imaginary "rest mass". (Of course they're never at rest, and neither are photons!). There's also "something" that seems to go faster than light in the EPR paradox.

I believe that superluminal interactions occur by "mutual adreement" rather than causality. I've always wondered about the "conflict" between "causality" and Newton's third law (action and reaction).

I've recently come to the conclusion that "causality" is actually an illusion, along with the 2nd "law" of thermodynamics, which only occurs because of the initially low entropy in the universe. The measurement problem falls into a similar category.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Speed of Light
Old
  (#43 (permalink))
Grandmaster
austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond reputeaustintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
 
austintorn@aol.com's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,173
Thanks Given: 542
Thanked 1,081x in 820 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rep Power: 53
   
Awards Showcase
Member of the Quarter 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Speed of Light - 07-07-2008, 04:58 PM

The speed of light may be the rpm rate that that a nucleon spins at, throwing off a blob of energy as a photon at that same rate.

As there is a limit to the spin of a nucleon, the speed of light is limited as well.

Just a guess.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Speed of Light
Old
  (#44 (permalink))
Blue Belt
timeparticle will become famous soon enough
 
timeparticle's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 90
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 23x in 20 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2008
Rep Power: 1
   
Re: Speed of Light - 07-11-2008, 11:28 PM

I take my Time Particle Accelerator every night into the future. The planet seems to have recovered from the dark ways of the Age of Man, in the future, but the Hobbits seem to be a little cranky. I like the tall female Elves, personally. They seem to be in charge of earth. I hooked up with a couple of them ... they're very wise and strong. Coming back to present is a little depressing, but my TPA shouldn't stay in future time to long as the time strings start to vibrate... it gets really loud... so I return. The men seemed to have gotten shorter, and the women taller. Maybe that is some sort of time lord punishment for messing up the planet. I suppose they'll call that future time period, the Age of Women, but who knows....time will tell. I'm going back tonight. I'll tell them you inquired about the future and time travel. They usually laugh when I bring up the how the past times were here on earth in the Age of Man, and ponder how much better life is now. I think the Hobbits are cranky because they have not settled into the new age so well... Middle Earth was curious to them, So Late Earth must be unsettling.

Later, Tp
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Mechanics Mohsen Physics Articles 5 07-16-2007 07:04 AM
The cause of gravity wisp Forces of Nature 152 06-21-2007 03:57 PM
My Time Paradox Guille Time Travel 113 09-04-2006 05:47 AM
The TOE part one: baudrunner Your TOE Theory 61 03-19-2006 01:35 PM
My Project For A Central Time-coordinates System humanbydefault Spacetime 0 03-13-2006 10:47 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com