Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Yes. According to law of energy conservation, the total energy of the universe does not change and it is time independent. The time derivative of energy is always zero.

    [math]\frac{\partial E}{\partial t} = 0 [/math]

    But for Hamiltonian systems, the total energy is the sum of kinetic and potential energy but the potential energy is always found to be negative.
    but, what about the transfer of energy? If I am moving and crash with you, then you start moving, my KE has mpast to you. this is motion. so it has time.

    and, is PE always equal as big, but in negative to KE?

  2. #12
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    all our imaginary motions exist between our 4D and the 1D of a higher LOE (5D in our point of view).

    if PE is exactly equal to KE, the Lagrangian is exactly zero and we remain motionless in 4D. To remain motionless in 4D is the same as reducing our physical dimension by one so that we become 3D energy and live forever.

  3. #13
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    all our imaginary motions exist between our 4D and the 1D of a higher LOE (5D in our point of view).

    if PE is exactly equal to KE, the Lagrangian is exactly zero and we remain motionless in 4D. To remain motionless in 4D is the same as reducing our physical dimension by one so that we become 3D energy and live forever.
    then, whent here is absolute zero, matter becomes energy!!!!???????¿¿¿¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡

  4. #14
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    then, whent here is absolute zero, matter becomes energy!
    matter becomes energy in 3D. But absolute zero is when energy becomes continuous space at 2D.

  5. #15
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    matter becomes energy in 3D. But absolute zero is when energy becomes continuous space at 2D.
    then,

    matter with out motion is energy

    energy without temperature is continuos space

    continous space without ______ is quantized space.

    what is the _____ word?

    are the other correct?

    I'm starting to end up understanding the whole of your theory.

  6. #16
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    matter with out motion is energy

    energy without temperature is continuos space

    continous space without ______ is quantized space.

    what is the _____ word?

    are the other correct?
    matter (4D) restricted to 3D is energy (time dimension taken out).
    from [math] E=mc^2[/math] where c is the ratio of area over time squared.

    energy (3D) restricted to 2D is continuous space (no volume).
    continuous space (2D) restricted to 1D is quantized space (no area or surface).

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. my reason for searching a toe
    By AntonioLao in forum Introductions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-11-2011, 02:10 PM
  2. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-18-2006, 07:36 AM
  3. Why we fail to see spin conservation in the quark realm:
    By Robert Duncan in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-04-2005, 01:52 PM
  4. The Dimensions of Charge
    By volantis in forum Relativity
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 02:08 PM
  5. Particles for Momentum
    By Guille in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-15-2005, 02:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top