It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Relativity
Reload this Page indefinite chopping up of physical quantities
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
indefinite chopping up of physical quantities
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
In Training
hardyivan007 is on a distinguished road
 
hardyivan007's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 4
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
Post indefinite chopping up of physical quantities - 05-07-2005, 06:08 AM

Planck says that time and other measurements cannot be chopped up indefinitely. he stated that light would take 10^-43 secs to travel 10^-35 of a metre, and that is the smallest value physical quantities can be broken down into. what evidence is there to support this? coz i really dun like his theory. i think that time and other measurements can be chopped up indefinitely but its just that we do not have the ability to measure them yet.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Blue Belt
Omni will become famous soon enoughOmni will become famous soon enoughOmni will become famous soon enough
 
Omni's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 105
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 18
   
05-07-2005, 06:24 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by hardyivan007
i think that time and other measurements can be chopped up indefinitely
This is true ofcourse.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
05-07-2005, 06:35 AM

just one thing:

if time and space can be reduced or "cut" indefinatelly that means that they can be "cut" infinatelly. And you can't measure infinites-sorry.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Blue Belt
Omni will become famous soon enoughOmni will become famous soon enoughOmni will become famous soon enough
 
Omni's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 105
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 18
   
05-07-2005, 08:50 AM

Let's say you have 1 sec then you have 0,5 sec also and 0,25 and 0,10 or whatever small number you care to use. Suppose you have 1 meter then you also have 0,5 meter etc. Don't see the problem with that.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished roadsubversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
05-07-2005, 01:24 PM

I would be interested in this too. Can anybody tell us how Mr. Planck decided that you could only chop things so small?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
05-07-2005, 05:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by subversion
I would be interested in this too. Can anybody tell us how Mr. Planck decided that you could only chop things so small?
I also want to know this. I can't give a scientific explenation of how he managed it, but I can say he did it with a lot of time, dedication, effort, and most specially.........thinking (icluding all thinking branches).
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the roughAntonioLao is a jewel in the rough
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 71
   
05-19-2005, 01:51 PM

History

Contrary to popular opinion Planck did not quantize light. This is plain in his writing in his original 1901 paper and in the references in this paper to his earlier work. It is also plainly explained in his book "Theory of Heat Radiation" where he explains that his constant refers to Hertzian oscillators. The idea of quantization was developed by others into what we now know as quantum mechanics. The next step along this road was made by Albert Einstein, who, by studying the photoelectric effect proposed a model and equation whereby light was not only emitted but also absorbed in packets or photons. Then, in 1924, Satyendra Nath Bose developed the theory of the statistical mechanics of photons, which allowed a theoretical derivation of Planck's law.

Nor did Planck derive his law in an attempt to resolve the "Ultraviolet catastrophe", the name given to the paradoxical result that the total energy in the cavity tends to infinity when the equipartition theorem of classical statistical mechanics is applied to black body radiation. Planck did not consider the equipartion theorem to be universally valid, so he never noticed any sort of "catastrophe" - it was only discovered some five years later by Einstein, Lord Rayleigh, and Sir James Jeans.

From the Planck's law of black body radiation we can obtain the Stefan-Boltzmann law by integrating the energy density over all wavelengths.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Astral Projection Guille Paranormal Phenomena 15 04-06-2008 02:22 PM
What is Physical Chemistry? michellemfry Chemistry 2 03-31-2006 04:54 PM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM
Information and Entropy in Mathematical and Physical Systems TinyTree Your TOE Theory 3 12-01-2005 09:43 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com