| skaper,
I would like to recieve this provement. If you refear to the provmeent of the accelerationa expansion of the universe, I don't need it: I support it and know it. But if you refear that there IS or has to BE a type of energy to explain the accelerational expansion of the universe and that there is prove it, please give it in here-I would much apreciate it.
About energy, I sustain the idea that we should think of energy not only as the possibility of doing work but as all the relatives to doing work. This includes the in-possiblity of doing work. Thus, the total energy will be the same always-in acceptance to the conservation of energy principle. What changes is the two basic types of energies: positive and negative. Ability and in-ability. Sometimes it can do more or can do less. Thus for me makes more sense.
By the way if you mean by empy space, vacuum space, then, no: vacuum space has no property other than energy: 100% of negative/inability of doing work. This is truly logical. But of course if you define vacuum space as nothing or nothingness then sorry, it has no type of energy. But if you think that vacuum space is infact space, which can exist-for now theoretically-then this works because there is space, I don't know what space is made of but I think that is one of the basics for a TOE.  | 
Linear Mode
