Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 111x in 82 Posts
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Dear friends,

    Now, Let us see for example, the problem of increasing mass of a moving object in which we could not understand why it is something like that. Armed with our aether-based STR, we could explain that the increasing mass was due to the resistance of vacuum medium space!

    And it is easy to see an analogy in our daily life – our driving car experience in which we will found that at low speed the fuel consumption rate is less than at high speed, the faster car - the higher consumption rate. The reason is because of air’s resistance, the faster speed - the higher resistance. In another view, we can equally say that the faster moving car means the greater increasing mass of the car!

    Next, let us suppose that we are driving in an air free tunnel without air’s resistance, then we would found that the fuel consumption rate is constant at any speed and which also means that the moving car’s mass is constant too! This is the concept of Galilean transformation which works under the concept ofNewton absolute empty space!

    By using the same reason we would found that time dilation is also caused by the resistance of vacuum medium space which slows down the mechanism of the moving clock. Lastly the reason for length contraction was due to that there is no reference rest frame in STR; it is an appearance of relative length – not a real contract length. In conclusion we may say that Einstein tried to keep the conventionalprinciple of relativity, so what he had to sacrifice is the distortion of space and time!

    Sincerely,
    Nimit
    -------------------
    www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

  2. #12
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 111x in 82 Posts
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Dear friends,

    Next let us consider the second hypothesis of STR - light velocity is the same for any observer, the problem is that we do not know why it is being so! Armed with the concept of vacuum medium space, it is more reasonable and easy to understand thatlight velocity is constant (the same) for any observer reference to(the same) vacuum medium reference frame!

    Finally we will solve the conventional believe about the different between the Doppler Effect which occurred with sound waveandlight wave. The reason is because it was misleading by STR that light wave need no medium for travelling while sound wave travelling via air medium!

    (And to explain the mislead concept, it was claimed that light could travel by itself via mutual creation between electric field and magnetic field. But the problem is that both electric field and magnetic field are simultaneous rise and fall at the same time, and then they cannot create each other; otherwise it will violate principle of causality!)

    Now under our new concept of vacuum medium space; it is more rational and understandable that light wave use vacuum medium for travelling! And we could derive relativistic Doppler Effect formula for sound wave in the same way as was done with the light wave. Finally what we got is that we can use the same concept for deriving Doppler Effect for both sound waveandlight wave!

    In conclusion we could say that Einstein created his STR which based on non aether-based (empty space) concept due to lacking of the evidence of physical space, so what he got with STR was the side effect due to theexistence of vacuum medium. Nowadays we have found vacuum medium space, and then what we got is more complete aether-based STR without any side effect! (Detail explanation of this article could be found in “Completed Einstein special theory of relativity” in www.vacuum-mechanics.com.)

    Sincerely,
    Nimit
    -------------------
    www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

  3. #13
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 111x in 82 Posts
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Dear friends,

    Next let us consider the second hypothesis of STR - light velocity is the same for any observer, the problem is that we do not know why it is being so! Armed with the concept of vacuum medium space, it is more reasonable and easy to understand thatlight velocity is constant (the same) for any observer reference to(the same) vacuum medium reference frame!

    Finally we will solve the conventional believe about the different between the Doppler Effect which occurred with sound waveandlight wave. The reason is because it was misleading by STR that light wave need no medium for travelling while sound wave travelling via air medium!

    (And to explain the mislead concept, it was claimed that light could travel by itself via mutual creation between electric field and magnetic field. But the problem is that both electric field and magnetic field are simultaneous rise and fall at the same time, and then they cannot create each other; otherwise it will violate principle of causality!)

    Now under our new concept of vacuum medium space; it is more rational and understandable that light wave use vacuum medium for travelling! And we could derive relativistic Doppler Effect formula for sound wave in the same way as was done with the light wave. Finally what we got is that we can use the same concept for deriving Doppler Effect for both sound waveandlight wave!

    In conclusion we could say that Einstein created his STR which based on non aether-based (empty space) concept due to lacking of the evidence of physical space, so what he got with STR was the side effect due to theexistence of vacuum medium. Nowadays we have found vacuum medium space, and then what we got is more complete aether-based STR without any side effect! (Detail explanation of this article could be found in “Completed Einstein special theory of relativity” in www.vacuum-mechanics.com.)

    Sincerely,
    Nimit
    -------------------
    www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

  4. #14
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    761
    Blog Entries
    9
    Thanks Given
    14
    Thanked 209x in 170 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Is light a material ball that for some reason bounces off other balls in space; or is space more complicated than the matter we see? Smashing subatomic particles results in smaller particles {balls what causes them?} there must be a reason why two objects can't occupy the same location at the same time. Then there is the problem of the integration of the system so that everything is running at the same speed as though there is a universal clock. In an aether does everything occur at the same time or is it a single thing that repeats at super high speed each step occuring after another simular to what happens in a tv set?

  5. #15
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 111x in 82 Posts
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Quote Originally Posted by spacedout View Post
    Is light a material ball that for some reason bounces off other balls in space;
    Spacedout,

    - Light (photon) is a wave packet of vacuum medium, so it can bounce off other ball; it is analogous to water wave bounce off a rock in a pond.
    or is space more complicated than the matter we see?
    - ???
    Smashing subatomic particles results in smaller particles {balls what causes them?}

    - What which you called “small particles” are disturbed parts of vacuum medium.
    there must be a reason why two objects can't occupy the same location at the same time.
    - Can you and your friend occupy the same place at the same time?
    Then there is the problem of the integration of the system so that everything is running at the same speed as though there is a universal clock. In an aether does everything occur at the same time or is it a single thing that repeats at super high speed each step occuring after another simular to what happens in a tv set?
    - ???

    Nimit

    www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

  6. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,896
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    2,967
    Thanked 2,727x in 1,670 Posts
    Rep Power
    92

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Quote Originally Posted by vacuum-mechanics View Post
    .... But the problem is that both electric field and magnetic field are simultaneous rise and fall at the same time, and then they cannot create each other; otherwise it will violate principle of causality!)
    Hi Nimit

    A collapsing Electric Field gives rise to an increasing Magnetic Field. And vice-versa. This is how the Electro-Motive force is generated in Power Stations.

    They have an opposite rise and fall 'at the same time'.

    cool bananas ... greg
    'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
    ... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.

  7. #17
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 111x in 82 Posts
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Quote Originally Posted by Graybeard View Post

    A collapsing Electric Field gives rise to an increasing Magnetic Field. And vice-versa. This is how the Electro-Motive force is generated in Power Stations.

    They have an opposite rise and fall 'at the same time'.

    Hi greg,

    Nice to talk to you again.

    It seems that we are talking about at different point. What I am talking is about transmission (high frequency- radiation) of electromagnetic wave which obeys Maxwell equation, while you are talking about generation (low frequency- no radiation) of electromagnetic wave which obeys Faraday equation. Right?

    Nimit

    www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to vacuum-mechanics For This Useful Post:

    Graybeard (01-08-2012)

  9. #18
    Brown Belt
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    166
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 9x in 7 Posts
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    I am glad to see you are an ether believer because the ether exists. My story of the meaning of life in the "your toe" forum explains my ideas on the ether. I also have a thought experiment in the "thought experiment" forum which is designed to shed some light on the ether. Tomorrow I will explain the results of this thought experiment. The ether is everywhere and is very obvious. I do not understand why there is such resistance to it. Without an ether you end up having to invent an endless amount of particles to explain how the universe works. With an ether all these particles are not needed. The Michelson/Gayle experiment had a positive result to indicate the earth is rotating. I believe space to be accelerating towards the earth, therefore the only motion you can detect is rotation and space accelerating towards the earth.

  10. #19
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    316
    Thanks Given
    1
    Thanked 111x in 82 Posts
    Rep Power
    33

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    Quote Originally Posted by Brent View Post
    .... I also have a thought experiment in the "thought experiment" forum which is designed to shed some light on the ether........
    Dear, Brent,

    Nice to talk to you. What is it?

    Nimit

  11. #20
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    761
    Blog Entries
    9
    Thanks Given
    14
    Thanked 209x in 170 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: Einstein relativity vs. aether-based theory!

    If space is made of spungy Planck cubes that are bound to each other with a vortex at each of the 8 apexes of the cube this would make a space fabric that could stretch and compact. Also, the cube faces would warp as Einstein showed in his gravity concept. A wave through the fabric would be funneled due to the warpage of space.

    A vortex needs a particle field that has an average speed c with c^2 energy. If the universe is a time-line that is balled like twine and vibrates randomly, but by chance, vibrations occur in unison, a vacuum will move one way as a crossed chain wave particle, while a pressure crossed wave particle will move in the opposite direction. The speed of a crossed chain wave particle would be S = 1/P where p is the length of the time-line segment---the shorter the length of the segment the faster the crossed chain wave particle will go --- also vacuum and pressure cancel each other. Crossed chain particles come and go from vecter aether to random vibrating aether.

 

 
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top