[vacuum-mechanics]

“Electron is a tiny black hole”. Actually this is the concept from Einstein’s theory of electron. Its concept is that material masses of electron hold together by gravitational forces. Anyway it faced with difficulty that “normal” gravitational force is too weak to do the work.

But under the new concept - Vacuum mechanics, a tiny black hole was formed by gravitational force of vacuum medium. (Unlike a conventional black hole which was formed by gravitational force of the collapsed of huge matters.) So it needs not to overcome huge Coulomb repulsive force of the matters.

Indeed we could do a theoretical verification for electron is a tiny black hole! And this was done in an article titled “Completed Maxwell electromagnetic field theory”. Their, we would found that Maxwell electromagnetic field theory (which was lacked for its philosophical model) could be improved by the new concept of electron. Detail of the article is now presenting in the website www.vacuum-mechanics.com .

[Guille]

hi.


I 've been through the web and read Maxwell's electromagnetic theory completeness article.

There is something that does NOT make sense and it is that it is stated that gravity is in vacuum space also, in all spaces, no need of matter/mass around. How can this be? It just seems nonsense without an explenation.

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear Guille, friends,



Thank you for comment the article, and let I explain your question as follow;

It is better to start with one of the most important questions that are why masses create gravity. And we knew that even Newton, Einstein or any one can not explain it clearly why it is so. My proposed concept is that mass is the condensed of vacuum medium. And because vacuum medium is the vacuum energy (attraction energy that is gravity), so mass is born in with gravity.



Now come to your question – why gravity is in vacuum space? My answer is follow; we start with a hypothesis that there is “something” in vacuum space; it is not just a blank space (without anything!). And we had proved it that there is something in vacuum space! Now why that something we mentioned is gravitational energy?



The answer is that if gravitational energy is not the property of space (fabric structure vacuum space), then we will have the problem with the original of the universe. Why? Because in Big bang theory of the universe (which say that the universe is start with infinite dense of masses) is violates Law of conservation of energy! (That is where is this huge amount of masses come from?) But if we accept that gravitational energy is the fabric structure of vacuum space. Then the universe would begin with gravitational energy, no space (universe) no gravitational energy! That is the law of conservation of energy is preserved.



Actually the answer above is quite brief; please see detail in the original article in the same website. Then we could get it better, but if it is not so then we will discuss again.



By the way, when talking about that “something is make sense or not”? May be it is depend on who we are and what view you are looking. For the author which is a communication engineer who are familiar with something that could be visualized. It seems that it is not make any sense for me that gravity force can do its work through blank space (without any medium to carry it), but it will make more sense if we could understand it!



Sincerely yours,

Nimit Th.

[gs_cmans]

i still couldnt agree that Something form Nothing. U make clear the gravity on what. What is the defenition of an ideal vaccum.

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear gs cmans and friends,



- The idea of “something comes from nothing” is just one choice of the philosophy of existence that I choose, and you need not to agree with me. Another one is “something comes from something” which I do not choose, because I think that the first one is more rational as explained in my article.



- Talking about the definition of “vacuum”, from science dictionary it is “A volume of space that contains no particles of any sort.” And you may already know that it is just an ideal case, but in reality for example according to quantum mechanics it is full of energy.



- (For the second sentence of your massage, I am not so clear about its meaning but I will try to answer as in here.) If the question is - what is the gravity of vacuum space acting on? Then the answer is - each parts of vacuum medium of vacuum space are holding together between themselves by the gravity. Please see detail in the article, thanks.



Nimit Th.

[gs_cmans]

ya we know about the QM concept of "Vaccum is not really clean Vaccum". But still the i couldnt digest or understand the explanation of ur vaccum mechanics model. i have heard similar theory before here in our home town by a science speaking saint, but i was not yet convinced.

if you want have a look at vethathiri.org

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear gs cmans and friends,



- Vacuum mechanics (the mechanism of vacuum medium) concept’s general idea resemble to the well known aether theory, so if you are familiar with it then you could easily understand it. Anyway I have to admit that it is quite difficult to study it unless you have full background in physics.



- Thanks for your suggestion about vethathiri.org . After read it for the first time, I found that some of its early part resemble to my concept. Anyway his concept is rather a philosophical idea than a scientific one.



Cheer,

Nimit Th.

[force5]

Hi V-M,

I reviewed your site some months back and sent you an E-mail. I agree with many of your fundamental concepts but have some different explanations for some of your reasoning. I won't go into specifics here and now, but, since I agree with much of your findings, I believe you're on the the right track.

This is the first chance I've had to get back on the net in over three months. We can talk more about VM in the days/weeks ahead.

Trust your vision............John

[vacuum-mechanics]

Dear John and friends,

Thank you for interesting and your creative comment. I am please to have some discussion in any time for academic virtual and the progress of our world’s knowledge.

Waiting to talk to you again.

Nimit Th.

[dleviwing]

Nimit;
Like many others, you seem to feel that energy is an independent entity of the universe that exists without or along side a physical substance.
Your concepts appear to be based on the relationship of "mass" and "energy" equivalence.
Is this so??

Though I disagree with the concept of energy as a separate entity, I am aware that this concept can be used to interpret many phenomena.
Best regards;
Dave