Quote:
|
Originally Posted by <<>> This makes us think of three mayor different interactions:
1. PHYSICAL-PHYSICAL (ex: an apple falls on the grass)
2. MENTAL-PHYSICAL (ex: my mind makes my finguers type these words)
3. MENTAL-PHYSICAL-MENTAL (ex: my mind makes my finguers type these words and then you read them, and think about them (go into your mind)).
There is no MENTAL-MENTAL relationship possible.
What do you think about my theory? |
You are seeking for patterns from which to draw knowledge. This is good. I do the same thing. It helps to have models to work from.
My approach was to look for some kind of measurement that corresponds to a mental action. In the neurosciences, it turns out, emotions are directly measured by skin conductance. Also, an ongoing project by Princeton University uses computer to generate random numbers and seek patterns in the random numbers that correlate to real world events. It turns out that during Princess Di's death, the 9/11 attack, the 2004 tsunami, and other notable events, the random number patterns all synchronized. It was as though human emotions had affected the computers.
When I was a young Visual Basic programmer, I wrote a program that would draw a bar horizontally across the screen. In each loop of the code, the bar would randomly move either right or left. I found that I could touch the screen with my finger and make the end of the bar move toward and remain under my finger, no matter how many times I tried it.
Computer chips utilize the Hall effect, which depends on the conductance of the material in the chips. If it is true that neuroscientists can measure emotions by monitoring skin conductance, and Princeton can pick up mass consciousness emotions with their computer chips, then it may be true that emotions are, indeed, conductance. Emotions, being a form of consciousness, would then be dimensional and measurable and be able to interface with other devices utilizing conductance.
In nature, everything with a surface has conductance. Thus everything has an "emotion," although we should be careful not to assume emotions also mean intelligence. In the Aether Physics Model, even the Aether has conductance. So the Aether could be a medium for emotions to transmit between objects, whether humans or computers or anything else.
Perhaps this is why psychics can walk into a room and sense the feelings of people who were previously there, or hold an object possessed by its owner and tell what the owner was last feeling. Perhaps because the Aether has conductance that living beings can communicate directly via emotions through the Aether. Maybe some animals and plants are better at this than humans?
Even certain minerals are said to evoke specific "healing powers." Maybe in reality the minerals are evoking a certain emotion, which benefits those near it?
For all the unanswered questions I have proposed, it remains a fact that emotions are measured by skin conductance, that computers respond to mass emotions, and the Aether quantifies to include conductance. There is a lot of room for developing this theory further, and I have been working on this.
How many physics theories do you know that have the potential to explain psychic phenomena?
Quote:
|
Now, secondly, I have one thing to ask you. Maybe dimensions themselves can't interact between themselves, but the consequences of them do. For example, intertia and legth have direct relationship. So does time (change) and intertia, or time and legth. The only one that is a bit more dificult to find relationships with is charge, can you give one similar to these I have given, but with charge and any other of the three dimensions?
|
The answer to this question involves learning about the structure of Aether and charge. Charge is caused by linear mass moving through the Aether. Thus there is a direct relationship between the movement of the mass and the charge.
This is why I have said before that mass is orthogonal to charge. They are the same thing, but seen from different perspectives. A moving line of mass is directly proportional to charge. Hence, the equation:
h * Cd = e.emax^2
Angular momentum (moving line of mass) times Aether conductance equals strong charge. Thus, there is always the same mass to strong charge ratio for all matter, all throughout the Universe. This is a very helpful observation and could add a level of accuracy to astronomy like no other theory. By measuring the angle of curvature of light passing an object in space we can determine the object's exact mass. This is possible because the strong charge has a very specific effect on electrostatic charge, which is the cause of space-time curvature.
In any case, mass is orthogonal to strong charge, which means the two are different aspects of the same "event-thing."
Linear Mode
