Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Philosophy > Branches of Philosophy > Religion
Reload this Page what is the most powerful?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
what is the most powerful?
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
what is the most powerful? - 11-28-2005, 09:09 PM

infinite wisdom or infinite boredom, infinite knowledge or infinite ignorance, infinite energy or infinite vacuum, infinite love or hate, infinite understanding or infinite confusion, infinite order or infinite chaos, infinite happiness or infinite sorrow, infinite everything or infinite nothing...

The word "infinite" could also be replaced by the words "complete" and "total"


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
undefinable
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is a glorious beacon of lightdleviwing is a glorious beacon of light
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,792
Thanks Given: 25
Thanked 177x in 145 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 35
   
undefinable - 11-28-2005, 09:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The word "infinite" could also be replaced by the words "complete" and "total"

I would think that the words "complete" and "total" imply a limit that is attainable.
"Infinite" infers the unattainable. This is not a number nor a quantity; it is only a word that defines the undefinable.



David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
all in one or one in all
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
all in one or one in all - 11-29-2005, 11:31 AM

"complete" and "total" both imply the existence of "incomplete" and "partial" respectively.

partial wisdom or partial boredom, partial knowledge or partial ignorance, partial energy or partial vacuum, partial love or hate, partial understanding or partial confusion, partial order or partial chaos, partial happiness or partial sorrow, partial everything or partial nothing...Is the glass half empty or half full?

infinity, complete, and total are synonymous when describing qualitative properties contrary to quantitative properties. Qualities are subjective while quantities are objective.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is a glorious beacon of lightdleviwing is a glorious beacon of light
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,792
Thanks Given: 25
Thanked 177x in 145 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 35
   
11-29-2005, 02:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
infinity, complete, and total are synonymous when describing qualitative properties contrary to quantitative properties. Qualities are subjective while quantities are objective.
Antonio;
According to Webster's, they are not synonymous but I'm sure you are not trying to make a point about the use of the English language.

What is it that you are trying to say with this post?



David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
11-29-2005, 02:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
What is it that you are trying to say with this post?
What lies before birth and beyond death with all the in between expires, the most powerful concept of all ideas.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is a glorious beacon of lightdleviwing is a glorious beacon of light
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,792
Thanks Given: 25
Thanked 177x in 145 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 35
   
11-29-2005, 02:49 PM

You're right Antonio; I think religion is more complex than mathematics too.



David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
religion cause all the problem
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
religion cause all the problem - 11-29-2005, 03:07 PM

Dave,

Are we implying that religion is the prime mover of everything from philosophy to political science, to mathematics, to physical sciences and life sciences? And is it the different in religious belief or non-belief that causes all the problems we found in the world?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is a glorious beacon of lightdleviwing is a glorious beacon of light
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,792
Thanks Given: 25
Thanked 177x in 145 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 35
   
11-29-2005, 03:27 PM

Antonio;
Like all endeavors that are fueled by human nature, religion is also subject to the good, the bad, and the ugly sides of our species.

Science has been both advanced and retarded by religious figures.

It is human nature that moves all endeavors and quests for knowledge; each with their own motives. Not all are honorable. Not all are righteous.

I am an atheist and don't have any allegiance to religious dogma.




David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
belief in oneself
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
belief in oneself - 11-29-2005, 03:44 PM

My understanding then is that the belief in oneself is the most powerful concept of all imaginable concepts. So that one's life is really just an ongoing search for this individual identity. Could this be the same as loving oneself above all others? Could this be the same as Ayn Rand's philosophy of objectivism that in some respect implying materialism and selfishness are all virtues of human quality? It becomes a 'me-me-I-first' society?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Master
michellemfry will become famous soon enough
 
michellemfry's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep Power: 17
   
11-30-2005, 02:38 PM

Could you help me with the definition of infinite? I thought it was something like all the numbers you could have plus one more, at least that is mathematically. In immunology, they taught us about stem cells that were totipotent and pluripotent, and I thought there should be an omnipotent one. Totipotent and pluripotent cells can become anything. To me, these little things are all powerful. We all have them. They are not, however, infinite. But they can do almost anything. It is powerful, sort of.


Michelle
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does the Goddess mean Good? harmonygirl Intelligent Design 71 01-13-2007 04:13 AM
Do you believe Religion Shows Weakness in Society tom mccurdy General Discussion 30 01-30-2006 11:06 PM
can mass be quantized? AntonioLao Your TOE Theory 9 11-28-2005 06:07 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com