Einstein & Relativity Bashing with a Theistic Club.

[RascalPuff]

'A False World View'

"If reason and free will exist, then Einstein's cosmos is false. If a spiritual realm exists outside of a closed system of cause and effect, then Einstein's cosmos is false. If God is personal and transcendent then Einstein's cosmos is false. If God is the creator and differs in quality from the creation, then Einstein's cosmos is false. If there is a discrete separation between elements of the creation (heaven-earth, light-dark, land-sea, species after their own kind, man/creature, man as an individual) then Einstein's cosmos is false."

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/050128

An invitation to read more of author Fred Hutchison's remarkable views on Einstein & relativity; draw and express your own conclusions.

[r.p.bibra]

RP;Einstein did not create the cosmos nor the Nature. He was not a pebble even in the ocean of existence. Physical science is just entering in its stage of infancy, so we should not jump to the event horizon. Too far away is our journey and there is no short-cut either, step by step is the way. The first step is taken, others will follow till eternity is 'realized'.regards.ls.

[mkirkpatrick]

It really matters not who said what,hey that rhythms,I'm a poet and I did'nt know it!
All our voices and opinions are but hot air blowing in the wind,what is real,will remain
forever real,whether you know it or not,understand it or not,Einstein had a great mind,
so have millions of others,so what!

We are the living embodiments of reality,when we fully understand ourselves,the rest
will be childs-play!



regards michael.

[Max™]

'A False World View'

"If reason and free will exist, then Einstein's cosmos is false. If a spiritual realm exists outside of a closed system of cause and effect, then Einstein's cosmos is false. If God is personal and transcendent then Einstein's cosmos is false. If God is the creator and differs in quality from the creation, then Einstein's cosmos is false. If there is a discrete separation between elements of the creation (heaven-earth, light-dark, land-sea, species after their own kind, man/creature, man as an individual) then Einstein's cosmos is false."

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/hutchison/050128

An invitation to read more of author Fred Hutchison's remarkable views on Einstein & relativity; draw and express your own conclusions.

Why does Einsteins cosmos not get along with free will?
Why does it disallow anything outside of this universe?
Why does anything about God disprove Einsteins view of the universe?

The more that I extend upon the concepts of relativity, the more I find what seems to me as signs that this universe is not a wildflower, rather it is a bred and cultured form.

To me, Relativity and it's manifestation in this Universe imply a cosmic gardener.

There is a reason I have taken to referring to my theory as The Signature of the Gardener.

Intelligent Design tends to give a micro-managing view of God and creation.

I view it as a simpler more elegant selection process. Universes that produce complexity and order tend to bloom in more interesting and beautiful ways.

[jag]

Don't forget, Einstein said it's all an illusion. He could only describe the universe based on a mistaken perception of reality.

Fred Hutchison describes his universe based on an illusion also. It looks like we have duelling illusions. At least Einstein knew there was something missing but he could't quite put his finger on it.

I am confident that when the Unified Theory is achieved Einsteins' theories will be a good fit.

jag