Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 41 of 72 FirstFirst ... 31 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 51 ... LastLast
Results 401 to 410 of 720
  1. #401
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,538
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,756
    Thanked 3,872x in 2,675 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    In 1964 theoretical physicist John Bell showed that if hidden variables, whatever their form, are local, then they could be tested against conventional quantum mechanics.

    In 1982 a definitive series of “EPR experiments” with this configuration was carried out by Alain Aspect and his collaborators at the Institut d’Optique Théoretique et Appliquée in Orsay, France. They arranged it so the decision on the orientation of the polarimeter axes was made after the photon pair left the source so that only a superluminal signal could share the information between the detectors. The results agreed perfectly with conventional quantum mechanics and thus ruled out any subquantum theory with local hidden variables.

    The EPR results are widely discussed in the literature of quantum spiritualism. Physicists, on the other hand, are underwhelmed. Quantum mechanics has passed yet another empirical test. Ho hum.

  2. #402
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    Quote Originally Posted by leskey View Post
    ... ... it's replaced by peas.u're.-.seeking.
    Rule.#1

    Leskey don't do typos .

    ~*~


    - hard to beat fresh garden peas

    (so I recently discovered (when close to 40)).

    Yours,

    Nondescript spokesperson
    for the
    disgruntled frozen canned plastic pea corporation fodder

    generation.
    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  3. #403
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    Quote Originally Posted by leskey View Post
    When survival is no longer the primary motivation for humankind, it's replaced by peasure-seeking. As a species we have failed to learn that pleasure should be derived from acting out of love...but love has long-term objectives, which require effort and dedication - they're only achieved through a sense of duty and responsiblity. Instead, it's easier to choose love's corrupted counterpart, desire to achieve more immediate, but short-lived gratification...why? Because we can...and, in general terms, this is the Western world as we know it.
    Complete agreement

    There's a growing body of evidence to the contrary:
    Without any idea (as usual) whether I understand the issues here
    - is there any chance that we've action in blue (below)
    and
    detectors in red
    (capable of detecting action in only other the other phase (in pink) to phase of action of sub-quantum level energy).

    - consequently we report a potentially false conclusion
    - based on inadequate detection machinery.
    ---------...^...---------
    ->- ~~~ ~ ->- ~~~ ->-
    ---------...|...---------

    Quote Originally Posted by leskey View Post
    So overdue! Maybe change is a consequence of large numbers with a potentially longer lifespan?
    Complete agreement (as usual)


    The sub-quantum level
    --------------------------

    In line with the idea of the Dalai Lama and S.H of a Universe within each atom or nutshell -
    and
    the ideas of hierarchy and recursion

    - the energy feed below the sub-quantum level
    (I guess)
    - can be extrapolated to be
    orthogonal
    to our ((((...Rayleigh...))))((((...n=24...)))).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_...ayleigh_number

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_number

    In fluid mechanics, the Rayleigh number for a fluid is a dimensionless number associated with buoyancy driven flow (also known as free convection or natural convection). When the Rayleigh number is below the critical value for that fluid, heat transfer is primarily in the form of conduction; when it exceeds the critical value, heat transfer is primarily in the form of convection.
    An energetic flow which is transmitted into our frame of reference when it exceeds a threshold value
    reference
    Max (from this thread) and his description of the birth of a black hole -
    - when space can no longer 'support' the structure.
    ~paraphrase~
    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  4. #404
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    ----------
    .~ >
    ~ > ~
    ----------
    + energy

    ->- bounds exceeded ->-
    ----------
    ~ ->- ~ ->- ~
    ----------

    ->- concentro-rippled everto-slinkillations* ->-

    ~aka~ doinkin'
    **

    '/
    |-------------
    |-/...........\
    |-~ ->- ~ ->- ~
    |-\.........../
    |-------------
    '\

    -/---------
    -/-----..--\
    /...........\
    ~ ->- ~ ->- ~
    \.........../
    -\------..-/
    -----------


    --------------\
    /....----...\-|
    ~ ->- ~ ->- ~-|
    \......----./-|
    ------------../n



    *,** advanced technical speak.
    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  5. #405
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    ---------

    ----O----
    ----o----
    ----.----
    ----o----
    ----O----

    ----.---- seemingly like --------- except actually like:

    ....
    ( )<- roadcone
    ....\/
    ---------
    .../\
    ..( ) <- roadcone


    'seemingly like' :
    The nature of a wave to appear to be static when it's transmitting energy through its point of inflexion into orthogonal domain.

    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  6. #406
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??


    '\/
    \|-------------
    \|-/...........\
    \|-~ ->- o ->- ~
    \|-\.........../
    \|-------------
    '\\

    -/---------
    -/-----..--\
    /...........\
    ~ ->- o ->- ~
    \.........../
    -\------..-/
    -----------


    --------------\
    /....----...\-|
    ~ ->- o ->- ~-|\
    \......----./-|
    ------------../n

    colour (blue) coded



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar
    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  7. #407
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    '\/
    \|-------------
    \|-/...........\
    \|-~ ->- o ->- ~
    \|-\.........../
    \|-------------
    '\\

    -/---------
    -/-----..--\
    /...........\
    ~ ->- o ->- ~
    \.........../
    -\------..-/
    -----------


    --------------\
    /....----...\-|
    ~ ->- o ->- ~-|\
    \......----./-|
    ------------../n

    colour (blue) coded




    ^
    |y
    - x - ///
    - x - /z
    - x - /

    blue energy y axis (direction v)

    pulsation
    ---.---
    ---o---
    ---O---
    ---o---
    ---.---

    concentrating on the pulsatile expand-/contract-ing circle on plane xz

    -

    ->
    -->
    -<
    -

    colour-coded (below) grey,pink,blue,orange

    - the pulsatile motion of the circle will describe linear motion on xz plane at the specific right angle to the blue energy (on y axis (direction v))
    & x,y,z axes

    |
    v y........^
    | x - ...//
    |-)>)-)- z
    ->-x->- /

    more simply

    y
    |
    v -> x

    repeat this exact process 3 times over and

    ---1---

    y
    |
    v-> x

    |
    v->

    ---2---

    |..^

    v->|

    ---3---

    x
    -<-
    |..^

    v->|

    ring completion at ---4---

    [()]

    - 'seemingly' solid mass re-created as illusion of multifolded manifold.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_field_theory
    Quote Originally Posted by from Max (earlier in this thread)
    In the end, particles are regarded as excited states of a field.

    QFT is correct.

    An elaborately folded force field.
    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  8. #408
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    ->- concentro-rippled everto-slinkillations* ->-

    on the 3 planes involved below

    Quote Originally Posted by 3 turns

    x
    -3<-
    |...^
    2
    v->1|
    ((())) <- plane supporting a concentro-rippled everto-slinkillation

    - however on 3 planes -

    ->-



    3 turns 270 degrees

    doughnut
    ()()

    doughnut hole
    ()()

    ==



    L
    90 degrees

    ~*~

    270 degrees + 90 degrees
    ==
    360 degrees

    ~*~

    using blue and grey

    |
    v y........^
    | x - ...//
    |-)>)-)- z
    ->-x->- /

    ->-

    .....b
    .....a
    (d(o(n)u)t)-
    .....a n a

    in summary

    the world of mass materializes as a consequence of our underlying energetic source overloading its allocated subspace
    - mechanism seeking
    to turn a corner.

    recursion

    ( ... (n(n(n-3)-3)-3) ... )

    evolution
    trinity
    recursion
    hierarchy

    Thereby

    ()()
    ->-
    (())(())

    ->-

    n=24
    Rayleigh
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_attractor



    The illusion of particle -
    just evolutionary behaviour in fields.
    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  9. #409
    Grandmaster SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of SB_UK has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,980
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    561
    Thanked 501x in 394 Posts
    Rep Power
    56

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??


    .....b
    .....a
    (d(o(n)u)t)-
    .....a n a

    donut meets lemon (not banana flavoured) banana
    - make petit-fours

    live happily ever after
    .
    [ nothing other than killing money the law the savage within (original sin) matters ]

  10. #410
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,538
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,756
    Thanked 3,872x in 2,675 Posts
    Rep Power
    176

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

    Fruit flies like a banana.

    Do nuts ban a na?

    Time flies like death worms.


    Darn, I just can't seem to learn SB_UK notation language.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top