Does it take an intellectual to knock God??

[SB_UK]

... AND THIS UNIVERSAL LAW IS WHAT????

ut there.

(who's up for 'going on an ArToE quest' ?)

[SB_UK]

...the passion for this place we call 'home' is innate...

... the laws for humans have been seen ... to have come from humanity itself ...

• The ball which rolls down a hill regardless of size.
• All structures of reality 'roll' down a hill.
• The sand-timer which is turned around, just as the last grain falls.

The record ends, and we must begin again.

• The process repeating to a digital cycle (the pulsar which describes this digital rhythm).
• All structures of reality are bar-coded by their expression of digital rhythm.

[arthur]

Hello Lesky
It was my intention to have no more to do with this thread due to my boredom of contending with the (almost) absolute lack of good will shown to me by the very small number of people involved in it,---also--- because of the absolute lack of any display of interest in my proposition and because of the manifest lack of the ability of any of the very few posters involved to display logic, objectivity, common sense, integrity or even the 'common courtesy' of answering non loaded questions or any of the attributes needed to make open and rational discussion possible---But, I assume, Lesky, that you will have noticed all of this in objectively reading the earlier posts, therefore, if this is so, there will be no need for further reiteration.

One of the strange things that has kept me interested, Lesky, during my involvement in this thread, besides the unlikely possibility of having someone make a constructive reference to my proposition has been the intrigue of trying to find a way of explaining how and why posters (not only on this thread) are so willing to demonstrate their lack of the above characteristics with complete indifference and a disregard to that human protective quality of potential or actual 'embarrassment' and yet are happy to indulge in another protective quality of 'aggressiveness', without any qualms, in their attempt to either disguise or to hide or even circumvent the former quality of not "knowing" or of "not understanding" or of being just plain "ignorant" of something that in reality might be no more that a snippet of pseudo intellectual (whatever) which is of no meaningful use to them whatsoever except within their coveted intellectual ego's. When they do receive, for they surely will, a real or a metaphorical kick in the shin , as I have said before, it will all just waft into the aether.

Although I have no idea why you posted your letter and even though I have tried I still have absolutely no idea of the meaning of the point that you claim to have made in goodwill. I feel, Lesky, that if you were to reread your post with a little generosity, particularly the last paragraph, and consider how and why I might interpret it in another light. You wrote that you are interested in learning more of my hypothesis which I am sure you know that my having conceived it, studied it, honed it and fully tested its integral relationship to what I have called The Universal Law for more that 50 years that it is in fact an axiomatic theorem. Anyway-- learning more-- When you write that what I think of you post, "for better or worse" (???) is irrelevant and of no consequence. I think Lesky that with all of the will in the world, if it were to be necessary, even you would forgive me for having doubts concerning your claim of goodwill and also be forgive me for not believing your claim to be interested in learning more (???).

As to the remainder of your post I genuinely cannot even glean an understanding of it, I am therefore unable to offer a critique or to be able to judge its relevant.

…arthur..

On the assumption that there might possibly be some one with integrity on this thread I will do my best to not use bad language.


So, Leskey, why don't you (or any one else) take this opportunity to break the embarrassing chain reaction of emotional, illogical and silly, fruitless digs at me and be one of the first posters in this thread to objectively comment on my original proposition.? AND, why don't you become one of the only posters to display their intellectual integrity by sensibly answering such a question?

And very finally, You implied that we, even me, has peers, do I detect an oxymoron? for if I am unique and if you are unique can I or you have a peer??

…arthur…

[racecar]

Hi Arthur

[racecar]

You wanna know what I like about the word wannabe...

wannabe connected

what's wrong with that? Maybe it's being less wrong... there is no right.

[racecar]

What do you wanna be when you grow up?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q1Ar-woC5ys

[Mikal]

Hi Arthur...awhile back you stated, "get a piece of paper and write down what you know"

I did that and I wrote only one thing...."I know myself"....that may have no importance to you but has been of the utmost importance to me....


Regards Mikal

[SB_UK]

One simple idea which changes everything ... ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire

Fire is the oxidation of a combustible material... ... ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxidative_phosphorylation

Although the many forms of life on earth use a range of different nutrients, almost all carry out oxidative phosphorylation to produce ATP...

What are alkaline foods?
... ... ... foods which burn with an alkaline ash.

Alkaline foods:
fruits, vegetables (fresh)
- almost exclusively.

All change!
toot toot !

'alkaline' foods burning to produce net HCO3- (alkalinity) [greater than H+ (acidity) ] -
the body's pH'ing system works to maintain an alkaline pH
the body's pH'ing system is confounded by current Western 'acidic' diets.

Goodbye Ronald McDonald -
your time (my sweet) is nigh.

acidic foods
(not to be eaten)

• meat
• dairy
• sugar
• coffee,tea,fizzy drinks
• oil
• convenience food
• processed foods (white bread,rice,pasta)

The empirical experiment to the rescue
- anybody can confirm (the above) with a match and a 1 cent pH stick.

Impossible to shroud the truth from people -
- no matter how rich the corporation
- this idea is just too simple.

Impossible for big money to target their advertising and marketing execs to protect their profit margins -
- at long last -
people to the fore.

Scrw the corporation!

Too funny!

The greedy Food Corporation has been eating us provably to death; it's time to sue the lawyer.

The lawyer, banker and politician alongside their business chums are scheduled for summary oxidation -
- and won't it feel good to sift through their rotten acidic ashes?

Certainty level that human disease will be alleviated by dietary intervention?
100% (absolutely certain)

~*~

Consumerism ends with an end to the Consumer (the animal within).

[SB_UK]

And why did it take us this long to arrive at that understanding?

Because of money -
the vested interest.

Which is why we are going to need to

[SB_UK]

Money is bad.