I do not know Dip, that might be a one way look.
I was going to post an apology to all you doctorates an such of thought in this thread backing the CERN project. My venting of distaste to the project has been based on a lack of information. The way technology changes and has changed from the time the project was purposed and thought of is probably my biggest ponder.
Experiments to date in areas of protons and electrons have so blown some ponders right out into reality. They stop light and then go on to pick it up and move it and start it up again. They take a single electron and reverse its spin. Whole new science to protons as a particle of mass even in transient form. ... the northern Borealis event ... and did they have these for just a few in the considerations back then when they planned this project? Have they incorporated the science in this or things like the way fusion magnetic fields are being created? ... could they have even perceived being able to condense sodium to near absolute zero like they have? We will never know this probably nor dare ask right?
I just do not think there should be smashing. It is just so ... unnatural, to say the least ... but prove me wrong (figuratively) ... time.
Kind Regards G.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote


