[krateesh]

Do u think that it will really effect the hypernova concept of GRB that they are blasts of energy by primordial black holes.

Please respond, aren't there some astronomy nerds and geeks,"STRING THEORY AND TOE IS NOT THE ANSWER TO ALL OF ASTRONOMY MYSTERIES"
ok,so i think u surely will.

[dleviwing]

I think I’ll wait until intelligence reigns over the media of hype and speculation.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by krateesh Do u think that it will really effect the hypernova concept of GRB that they are blasts of energy by primordial black holes. Please respond, aren't there some astronomy nerds and geeks,"STRING THEORY AND TOE IS NOT THE ANSWER TO ALL OF ASTRONOMY MYSTERIES" ok,so i think u surely will.

i did hear that there is an event horizon at the black hole where particle/form are thrown out but what and where i read it in the last few years escapes me.

Peace! Graham

[neutralino]

Originally Posted by G_burnett i did hear that there is an event horizon at the black hole where particle/form are thrown out but what and where i read it in the last few years escapes me. Peace! Graham

Particles are not "thrown out" of a black hole from its event horizon. You may be thinking of Hawking Radiation, or you may be thinking of relativistic jets being emitted from the accretion disk around a rotating black hole. These don't contradict the fact that nothing can "come back" from behind the event horizon of a black hole.

[G_burnett]

Originally Posted by neutralino Particles are not "thrown out" of a black hole from its event horizon. You may be thinking of Hawking Radiation, or you may be thinking of relativistic jets being emitted from the accretion disk around a rotating black hole. These don't contradict the fact that nothing can "come back" from behind the event horizon of a black hole.

Yes!
i was thinking of the Hawking theorem in the diminishing into nothing of the larger black holes. The dragon who starts with his tail and eats himself again but it does make since that there is the escape of protons and it being a transition form not a a mass? Are the black holes when they originate the true def of void where the collapsed is just the rushing in of form like a whorl pool of water in the river? And when they go diminish to nothing the void is no more? Maybe i have been in the bush to much lol.
It is a hard grasp for me in the contradictions of particle form being mass or not and i hope this year as they planned with a spring space shot it becomes more then theorem to add a few more Questions to ponder here.

Thanks neut

Peace! Graham