Question.

[mkirkpatrick]

Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter

(all elementary particles and all quarks and

their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,

all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,

muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.

It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.

EMPTINESS- NOTHING….???

Ok!

But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in

common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?

I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in

the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that

is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition

by the formula T=0K.

* * *

Once there was a “Big Bang”.

But in what space had the Big Bang taken place

and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?

Not in T=0K?

It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.

Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is

in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests in relic radiation of the Big Bang ).

But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.

What temperature can this radiation reach?

Not T=0K?

Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,

we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING .

Everyone knows about the “singular point”, but nobody knows that it is

EMPTINESS- NOTHING! To understand it, it is necessary to ask a question:

What geometric and physical parameters can particles have in T=0K?

Can they have a volume?

No.

Then they must have the geometrical form of a flat circle: C/D =p= 3,14.

But what these particles do ?

Nothing.

They are in a condition of rest: h = 0. So, maybe they are dead?

In order to answer of this question, it is necessary to more clearly understand

EMPTINESS- NOTHING.

* * *

Has this EMPTINESS- NOTHING a border? No! It has no borders.

EMPTINESS- NOTHING is indefinite. Let's identify it by the formula: T=0K = ∞

And what about time in the EMPTINESS- NOTHING ?

Independent time is absent.

Time in EMPTINESS- NOTHING is indissolubly merged with infinite space.

Stop!

But you see, such space is described by Einstein in Special Relativity Theory.

In SRT, space also has a negative characteristic and there also,

time is indissolubly merged with space.

Only in SRT, this EMPTINESS- NOTHING has another name:

Negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space.

Then it is possible to conclude that SRT describes the behaviour

of the circle-particles in T=0K.

Are we talking about a "singularity" here as being the point,where no-thing became some-thing!and is this point a dimensional portal,which the
nomena became phenomena!Via say a Protyle atom!Just a thought.

regardsmichael.

[socratus]

"One thing I have learned in a long life:

that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike -

- and yet it is the most precious thing we have."

/ Einstein /

* * *

The quantum physics approves, that in the beginning God has created

" virtual particles ".

Astrophysics approve, that in the beginning the God has created " latent mass ",

"invisible particles ".

From them the God has created everything.

But nobody knows, what is " virtual particles ",

what is " latent mass ", " invisible particles ".

It is very strange situation.