[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by socratus Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter (all elementary particles and all quarks and their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks, all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational, muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”. It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”. EMPTINESS- NOTHING….??? Ok! But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms? I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition by the formula T=0K. * * * Once there was a “Big Bang”. But in what space had the Big Bang taken place and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed? Not in T=0K? It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K. Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests in relic radiation of the Big Bang ). But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease. What temperature can this radiation reach? Not T=0K? Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future, we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING . Everyone knows about the “singular point”, but nobody knows that it is EMPTINESS- NOTHING! To understand it, it is necessary to ask a question: What geometric and physical parameters can particles have in T=0K? Can they have a volume? No. Then they must have the geometrical form of a flat circle: C/D =p= 3,14. But what these particles do ? Nothing. They are in a condition of rest: h = 0. So, maybe they are dead? In order to answer of this question, it is necessary to more clearly understand EMPTINESS- NOTHING. * * * Has this EMPTINESS- NOTHING a border? No! It has no borders. EMPTINESS- NOTHING is indefinite. Let's identify it by the formula: T=0K = ∞ And what about time in the EMPTINESS- NOTHING ? Independent time is absent. Time in EMPTINESS- NOTHING is indissolubly merged with infinite space. Stop! But you see, such space is described by Einstein in Special Relativity Theory. In SRT, space also has a negative characteristic and there also, time is indissolubly merged with space. Only in SRT, this EMPTINESS- NOTHING has another name: Negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. Then it is possible to conclude that SRT describes the behaviour of the circle-particles in T=0K.

Are we talking about a "singularity" here as being the point,where no-thing became some-thing!and is this point a dimensional portal,which the
nomena became phenomena!Via say a Protyle atom!Just a thought.

regardsmichael.

[socratus]

"One thing I have learned in a long life:

that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike -

- and yet it is the most precious thing we have."

/ Einstein /

* * *

The quantum physics approves, that in the beginning God has created

" virtual particles ".

Astrophysics approve, that in the beginning the God has created " latent mass ",

"invisible particles ".

From them the God has created everything.

But nobody knows, what is " virtual particles ",

what is " latent mass ", " invisible particles ".

It is very strange situation.