Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    space trimmer and time slicer

    If the whole of space-time is like a loaf of bread, a time slice would be a coordinate patch sharing a set of common spatial coordinates at a particular instant. In so doing, the local infinitesimal degrees of freedom is reduced from 8 to 6, removing 2 temporal degrees, giving a static 3D space of pure energy (color 2D photograph or 3D wooden figurine). The static set is equivalently R mapped into R itself by 1-to-1 correspondence. Although a 2D photograph mapped into R or R or higher without compromising any information content is possible, it remains 2D if the correspondence stays 1-to-1. However, if the correspondence is upgraded into 1-to-many, or many-to-1, or many-to-many then the content becomes a 3D living picture as if not just Pinocchio’s wooden nose lengthening but the boy becomes a living human being of flesh and blood http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinocchio. The reverse process is a picture of Dorian Gray http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Picture_of_Dorian_Gray.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    6th degree Black Belt harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    31

    Cool Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Antonio, are you saying that the 'slice' of space-time (which I just consider co-ordinates or locations) doesn't vary as you dimension slip?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    the 'slice' of space-time
    An instant of time. A photograph would be an example of an instant of time. Yet as a whole, the photograph still subjected to time evolution. Close inspection will reveal that even the tiny elementary particles making up the photograph (electrons and protons) do eventually become separated from each other.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    An instant of time. A photograph would be an example of an instant of time. Yet as a whole, the photograph still subjected to time evolution. Close inspection will reveal that even the tiny elementary particles making up the photograph (electrons and protons) do eventually become separated from each other.
    But surely Antonio,this would take a very long process of time to elapse,before this became evident!


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62

    Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Antonio,

    What is the range of value for the many-to-many relationship? I mean, is it from 2-to-2 to infinity-to-infinity? Or is the maximum value less than infinity?

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille
    What is the range of value for the many-to-many relationship?
    The more relationships the more complex the system becomes. The simplest atom is the hydrogen atom with a relation between one electron and one proton. Yet, now we know that even the proton is composite of 3 quarks.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #7
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62

    Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The more relationships the more complex the system becomes. The simplest atom is the hydrogen atom with a relation between one electron and one proton. Yet, now we know that even the proton is composite of 3 quarks.
    Ok now I understand the range of value of the many-to-many relationship is infinite (or a very very big number approaching infinity). But now I think, is the many-to-many relationship appliable for ever, not in quanity as you've proven, but in size aspect? To understand this we shall look at your example of the Hydrogen atom. The proton is formed of quarks. Are the qaurks made of something smaller? Strings maybe. And strings are made of... something else. And those of something. And those... Is this series infinite, or can the many-to-many relationship but a limit here? Also the other wat round, the multiuniverses etz...?

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille
    is the many-to-many relationship appliable for ever, not in quanity as you've proven, but in size aspect?
    By empirical means, there is a limit probing the infinitesimal substructures of quarks and leptons since all instrumentations are made from them.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #9
    The Thinker Guille is a glorious beacon of light Guille is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    62

    Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    By empirical means, there is a limit probing the infinitesimal substructures of quarks and leptons since all instrumentations are made from them.
    But there was also a limit once for protons and neutrons. In what way is there a difference between then present day smallest quanta and the ones thought of in the past?

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: space trimmer and time slicer

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille
    In what way is there a difference between then present day smallest quanta and the ones thought of in the past?
    There is no difference, the old days and modern days field quanta are the three generations of quarks and leptons.What are yet to be detected are Higgs bosons, magnetic monopoles, and the right-handed species of neutrinos.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top