[AntonioLao]

Antimatter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter and matter are distinct realities sharing no common topologies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology. However, the close encounter of these two realities becomes pure energy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy. Light http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light is a form of pure energy at the lowest level of existence (LOE) or vacuum level http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum. Empirical evidence supports the random fluctuation of quantum vacuum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_fluctuation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy inner space-time while continuous vacuum support nothing in outer space-time http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space except for its homogeneity and isotropy in accordance with the cosmological principle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copernican_revolution. Furthermore, outer space-time possesses a Hubble or accelerated expansion property http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_universe not shared by inner space-time. The symmetry of inner space-time of quantum vacuum is a disjointed symmetry of independent space symmetry and independent time symmetry. These two kinds of independence should have supported two equally realizable topologies. So, if the outer expansion is the effect of one topology then an inner contraction would then be supported by the missing topology bounded by asymptotic freedom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotic_freedom or infrared slavery http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0502/0502110.pdf.

[mkirkpatrick]

Prehaps whats missing Antonio is our deep understanding of fundamental reality!The name of antimatter conjures up ideas of things like warp-drive on Star-trek,that use antimatter as a propulsion fuel.

If as the name suggests that antimatter is the exact opposite of matter,then it exists in
the other side of the singularity point.Which I would consider to be etheric realm.

I take the view that antimatter is really etheric matter,which exists outside of our physical
continuum.


regards michael.

[bottomlander]

Unlike other terms being popular only recently, antimatter alreadybeen used with a long history, since 1928. The usage of antimater is within mainstream physics and standard modle of elementary particles.

As in wikipedia, Positron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of the electron. All elementary particles have their own anti-particles. Photon has itself being its antiparticle. They are different only regarding their charges.


Anyhow, why antimatter is so scarce in our nearby galaxies are still open for rival explanations.

In case more differences upon the properties of matter are helpful to build a model, better to coin other new words rather than giving a new meaning to antimatter. This will cause troubles to semantics. Unfortunately, dark matter also got its specific usuage already!


Regards. bottomlander

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Originally Posted by bottomlander Unlike other terms being popular only recently, antimatter alreadybeen used with a long history, since 1928. The usage of antimater is within mainstream physics and standard modle of elementary particles. As in wikipedia, Positron is the antiparticle or the antimatter counterpart of the electron. All elementary particles have their own anti-particles. Photon has itself being its antiparticle. They are different only regarding their charges. Anyhow, why antimatter is so scarce in our nearby galaxies are still open for rival explanations. In case more differences upon the properties of matter are helpful to build a model, better to coin other new words rather than giving a new meaning to antimatter. This will cause troubles to semantics. Unfortunately, dark matter also got its specific usuage already! Regards. bottomlander

We need to graph and map a new topology algorithm between our sub-quantum language systems and quantum language systems. Just as string theory is no more than another gauge theory, in a long list of quantum and sub-quantum gauge theories, loosely connected by symmetries, smoothnesses, renormalizations, etc., quantum theory also qualifies for a list of theories loosely string/strung together, yet still describing much of our real world. We need new algorithms to merge all theories, and fundamental forces. I will state a fact for hot dispute; "The 5th force of nature, hydrodynamics, is the absolute and total mechanics of the entire universe, uniting all the four forces of nature, including all scientific analytic thought, and the natural perceptual mind." This also would equal the TOE or FOE[facts of everything]...

The hydrodynamic compression/expansion topological algorithm of the universe___what is it...?

Regards,
Lloyd