Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | 4th degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 535
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 19x in 16 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005 Rep Power: 16 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
06-01-2006, 07:13 PM
I will be the first to admit that I am not capable of a full appreciation of your idea for no other reason than that the discussion in you paper is simply too deep for my full understanding, but I can apply some thinking of my own on the subject of wormholes, and would appreciate your comments.
I have discussed elsewhere on this site the concept of the accelerating phenomenon that is evolution, and also the nature of the expanding creation front of the Universe and as well the hysteresis effect of that creation front wherein we find the manifestation of life in this limited spectral band of creation as the necessary predisposition to the consciousness which must meet the criteria for creation in the first place. By extension then, it appears to me that any method that allows for the transfer of travellers over vast distances in small amounts of time are necessarily limited by the "current state" of the locale wherein the travellers eventually find themselves. I am not stating that those locales cannot be witnessed by cognizant entities, but rather that the nature of the destination is such that the predictability factor of that destination is seriously affected were the wormhole applied. It follows that probable disruption of the full extent of the wormhole from beginning to end is inevitable and a fully functioning one will probably never be realized, for it must have the same properties and subscribe to the same physics from end to end, and I think that it cannot.
Granted, this theory assumes a lot, not the least of which is that I am right in my suppositions of the fundamental nature of reality.
That is not to say that FTL mobility is impossible. In fact, I am of the opinion that humanity will someday be able to predict the exact nature of any corner of the Universe, and through the principle of "the co-incidental juxtapositioning of spatial co-ordinates within the framework of time and space" we will be able to instantaneously transport ourselves to any place in the Universe. Naturally this requires the modulation of the properties and characteristics of the described destination plane on a source plane. By simply walking through a frame that describes such a plane we will find ourselves where we intend to be. "There is nothing permanent except change" | |
| | | | | | White Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 9
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2006 Rep Power: 0 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-15-2007, 07:37 PM
Hi everybody,
Now, it's passed nearly one year from starting this topic. I don't know how would be the feedbacks, but this topic is no old at all.
Anyway, in reply to baudrunner I should say:
Thank you so much for the comment and please forgive me for this big delay.
Well, my wormhole framework is quite dynamic & in its ideal form, asymmetric as much as possible. From what can be inferred from the equations, it works & FTL travels in the universe is possible.
My efforts have been on the ways of producing the required negative energy densities up to now, which led to a paper in a conference: http://www.unm.edu/~isnps/pdfs/preliminarytechnical.pdf
Therefore, for a better reply, let me begin special studies on the geometrical features, then more facts can be stated.
To know what I was doing by now, take a look at this debate: http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/...topic=230&st=0
Cheers & Happy new year,
MM  | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-15-2007, 07:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mansouryar Hi everybody,
Now, it's passed nearly one year from starting this topic. I don't know how would be the feedbacks, but this topic is no old at all.
Anyway, in reply to baudrunner I should say:
Thank you so much for the comment and please forgive me for this big delay.
Well, my wormhole framework is quite dynamic & in its ideal form, asymmetric as much as possible. From what can be inferred from the equations, it works & FTL travels in the universe is possible.
My efforts have been on the ways of producing the required negative energy densities up to now, which led to a paper in a conference: http://www.unm.edu/~isnps/pdfs/preliminarytechnical.pdf
Therefore, for a better reply, let me begin special studies on the geometrical features, then more facts can be stated.
To know what I was doing by now, take a look at this debate: http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/...topic=230&st=0
Cheers & Happy new year,
MM  | I hope you suceed my friend,we need this warp drive,go to it.
happynew year to you too.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | White Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 9
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2006 Rep Power: 0 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-15-2007, 08:28 PM
Hello Michael,
Thanks a lot for your warm comment. I have some plans to continue it in the experimental phase, by the help of the "people of the world". I'm serious about that & the power of the people who are interested in this subject, plus a guy who has nothing to lose, shall show its effect to all, (damn on all the idiot governments). Expect me to announce my hot programs …
Best wishes,
Mammad | |
| | | | | | Orange Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 45
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006 Rep Power: 7 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-16-2007, 02:50 PM
Mohammad Mansouryar
Well we meet again, on yet another forum. It is always a pleasure to greet you. How have things been going?
I must admit I have not been to your site in a while, but I have been referring people there. So far everyone has had very nice things to say about it. Have you thought about adding a small forum to your site as well? Though many of the people I sent there said the math was over their heads, the material was explained well so that the basics was understandable.
I have been slow on my work on Milo's and Mach's equations. I get lazy this time of year. When I do get some of my papers together I will post them on my blog here, which I have not even started on yet. i am still trying to get my government to look at my body armor, which is a slow process. And lastly my radiation shielding for spacecraft is still ahead of its time, I will probably be dead before it is needed at the rate our space program moves, so things have not changed much with me. "(damn on all the idiot governments)" I hope your work is being better received?
You get discussed from time to time on the forum I am a forum administrator for, even though your work does not directly tie in with our work. I will continue to refer any interested parties to your site.
Of special interest to me was producing negative energy densities. In the past, I contended that negative energy densities did not occur naturally. However that does not rule out creating a negative energy density, a possibility I had never considered. Once again you have kept my old mind open to new possibilities. Thank you very much my friend.
Well I have rattled on far too long. I just wanted to say hello, and let you know I still support your work. Keep up the good work, and as always, I will try to keep up on things, and refer anyone with an interest to your site.
Aireal, my forum name.
Little Feather, my Native American Indian name
Charles Laster, my given name
Best regards from me, myself, and I in your work. | |
| | | | | | White Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 9
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2006 Rep Power: 0 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-16-2007, 10:51 PM
Little Feather,
Many thanks for your kind reply. Please accept my deep appreciations about your opinion on me & my works.
My current website does not contain any new data for months & cannot be improved further, for some technical reasons, therefore I plan to design a new professional-commercial one soon. I hope you'd have a long healthy & happy life to watch the fate of your innovations & their peaceful applications for the humanity. However, sadly we live in a pathetic age of low-value political regimes & not a desired presence of wisdom, love, & beauty to have a pleasant world.
Aireal,
I hope all of us would live in a world where a throughout understanding of the laws of the nature, would lead to a more profound harmony in our minds, bodies & behaviours. Let us all pray for that, but there is one more responsibility for the people who know a bit about their special expertise, and that is "taking a practical step"…
Charles Laster,
Please have my best hellos in return & walk in the road you've chosen. I wish you a nice destination & also bright horizons.
Little Feather,
I will report my activities in here or other forums, but whatever the results would be, I ask you & other visitors to remember me as a one who always tried to do good actions, however the fruit of his efforts could be dramatically better, if the era were kinder to him … Farewell,
MM | |
| | | | | | Orange Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 45
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006 Rep Power: 7 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-19-2007, 11:38 AM
Mansouryar
Glad to see you still have a sense of humor also.
On a serious note, when you do get a new website, be sure to drop me a P.M. or something and let me know so I can update the links on our W.S.M. forum. | |
| | | | | | 9th degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006 Rep Power: 25 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-20-2007, 04:35 PM
Great pdf. Great graphics. Bad physics is metaphysics... Mansouryar, you have nowhere convincingly explained how c produces c+, or h can be seen or known as -h, as a viable science. You must explain these fundamentals, first...
Shrinking distance is the same as c+ and -h, from the different perspective. Show how it is possible...
Regards,
Lloyd Quote:
Originally Posted by mansouryar | "To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel "Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein "The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G. "The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G. | |
| | | | | | White Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 9
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: May 2006 Rep Power: 0 | Re: Practical Spacewarp Design -
01-21-2007, 08:36 AM
Hello Lloyd, The story is not so. It is related to the geometrical part of my work. Indeed, that is based on the seminal paper of Morris & Thorne: M. Morris, K. Thorne, "Wormholes in spacetime and their use for interstellar travel: a tool for teaching general relativity" Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988).
Explicitly, a wormhole metric can create a proper length distance function that is finite by definition of traversable type ones; on the other hand, implicitly there is no limitation in the (two) locations a wormhole could connect (within the framework the above authors launched), however I've suggested the range of operation must be finite. So a desired curvature of spacetime would be a subtle artifact for FTL purposes. Quote: |
or h can be seen or known as -h, as a viable science
| Not being sure to understand this sentence, I guess you mean the mechanism of producing the macroscopic quantum manifestations. That relates to the ways of extracting the exotic matter in the paper. Well, those are gedankens with enough explanations near the figures, based on the known physics. Since the required calculations are excessively difficult, there is no possibility to have a full rough mathematical analyses in a near future on this case, probably except numerical simulations, so the best possible way alone, is doing some tests, because the principles are standard with no doubt. **********************************
If I'd be alive after a forthcoming war against Iran, & my new paper would be presented in that conference, & it would find suitable feedbacks in the (mainstream) experts, & all the elements of the universe would help to cause a good result for this subject!!, ... I'd be able to have more remarks about this ...
Last edited by dleviwing : 01-21-2007 at 04:22 PM.
| |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |