You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Destruction of printed organized sensitive information is most often done by the use of a shredder or in the old days, which are still practiced, so called “books burning.” Both processes promote ignorance and the suppression of knowledge and understanding. If information are quantizable then what is lost are its meaningful connections and not its contents. For example, using the English alphabets, the ordered concatenation of the letters CAT represents a feline creature out of six possible permutations: CAT, CTA, ATC, ACT, TAC, and TCA. In other written languages, such as Spanish, the same creature is represented by the letters “GATO.” Still in the English words, CAT also represents clean-air turbulence or computerized axial tomography. However, in a binary universe of two symbols or alphabets, say 1 and 0, or H+ and H-, the lost of connections could be accomplished by bit-shifting between all these space-time quanta, confining the continuous space-time connections to a given unit circle. At the minimum, two unit circles intersect forming distinct space-time structures. The shredding of space-time is equivalent to a commutative disconnection or in general disjointing space-time quanta.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
infinite divisibility is not possible. It has to stop somewhere. On the other infinite unity is everlasting but separated into positive unity and negative unity.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
I thought that one of the main premises for quantum physics was that, at a certain point, divisibility gives way to probability of existence. So, I think you're correct, it does stop somewhere, but only at the point at which time becomes a pre-condition of existence. Or perhaps I am not understanding?
The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
Re: shredding space-time -
06-10-2006, 03:14 PM
Linear Mode
