There is a reason that we apply the Heisenburg uncertainty principle when exploring probabilities of position and momentum of mass. Mass is not 3 dimensional as initially thought 100 years ago. It is an integral part of the functional behavior of our cosmos. This basic functional behavior is expansion. It is within and because of expansion that mass exists. When we examine the type of expansive behavior that represents mass, we find it is not 3 dimensional but 5 dimensional acceleration. A sphere and plane, (Saturn like) particle when effected in certain ways, it behaves like the sphere flattens into the plane and appears elsewhere in the plane, so probability is used.
At the LHC, It is not 3 dimensional particles, accelerated to impact 3 dimensional particles, creating a 6 dimensional impulse behavior. It is the combining of two 5 dimensional acceleration objects into a 10 dimensional object event. This distortion of space time generates flux, a 7 dimensional object, worm holes, and a 3 dimensional sphere of acceleration which could be convergent or divergent. The sheer power of this collider can lead to secondary events, which were not anticipated and are not controllable.
Because of this information, when the petition to prevent the construction was circulating through our local scientific community, I signed it. Thousands of scientist signed that petition for these reasons.(and others). Years passed and after the petition, a deaf ear, pride and stubbornness built it, and what they don't know, will destroy it. They are messing with a ‘Pandora’s box’.
We can not use the study of mass to explore/explain conditions of the bang. Mass did not exist until after the bang. We will not find a TOE in mass, only more mass and higher complexity models with more made up labels for interaction and particle names. Over the years, this course of study has gone from simplicity to complexity. Isn’t this the wrong direction for a real TOE ?
Happy thoughts….Q7


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




