[quote=north;33247]
Quote:
I agree that physical expansion is omnidirectional ( I'm assuming 3D , since you think in terms of 3D space. which I fully agree).
but as I see it , wouldn't this imply , an expansion that is not actually happening.
this is my point ( by the way I'm a steady-state supporter myself) why wouldn't our galaxy push galaxies one way , outwards , and others do the same , towards us . then when thinking in 3D , why would you not come to the conclusion of a null expansion situation?
|
_________________________
Dear north:
I would speak to you about the cause of the so called 'universal rate of descent of free falling objects in the absence of air resistance', but, until further notice, you have yet to acknowledge that very fundamental fact. It is remarkable that you are unaware of this.
To engage in discussion with you beyond that (unacknowledeged) point would be futile on my part.
Let me know when you have grasped the unexpected findings of Galileo and how those discoveries - about free falling objects - have been much further refined and confirmed, since then (re: 'Roland von Eotvos' and related experiments since then, on google).
As long as you adhere to heavier, larger, more massive objects falling faster than test objects of lesser magnitude, you are in a post graduate classroom asking jr high school questions with accompanying objections.
Do you know what 'inert' and 'heavy' mass, is?
Do you understand the importance of the Principle of Equivalence and what it means?
Do you understand why Einstein called the equivalence of 'inert' and 'heavy' mass:
"An astonishing coincidence"/
As you have previously presented your arguments, without concession to my counterpoints, it will be a waste of both of our times and efforts to proceed to even more questions, statements and allegory enigmas.
I have written ten sold out small press editions of a book over a period of nearly fifty years (in three languages) and I restrain myself from re-writing it again - piecemeal - in this debate.
You will find a condensed work in progress of my book at the afore provided URL.
Complimented by your (however limited) indulgence but averse to your persistence on a course, the fundamental levels of which you're apparently ignoring or otherwise abandoning as being cogent to what you now introduce a different - and more upgraded - approach to the same unresolved issue(s).
'Null expansion'.
While you're about your research, take note that a repelling force was confirmed in 1996 and that Einstein's formerly abandoned 'cosmological constant'
(becomes stronger with distance - refer accelerating expansion) is back on the slate. The Big Bangers have rescued themselves with what they formerly rejected ('the biggest blunder of my life' - Einsten)
Google: 'Cosmological constant - Einstein may have been right after all'.
Best regards,
- RP
Re: The 'curvature of space-time' is the physical expansion of matter. -
08-03-2007, 05:43 AM
Linear Mode
