Theory of Space-Time

[Tony Stanton]

Please visit www.theoryofspacetime.co.uk for a completely new mathematical theory of spacetime and let me know what you think of it. If my theory does not work, then please tell me why?

[dleviwing]

Tony;
Is this approach intended as a more simplified concept than current mainstream science??? If so, you may want to use a term other than "Space-Time" that indicates 4D geometry. I've added comments to each of your principles.

Best regards;

Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Principle I
A body or object ‘A’ can move within the Space-Time of any other body or object 'B' but its relative velocity is governed by the volume of Space-Time that body or object ‘A’ has generated. If body or object 'A' did not generate Space-Time it would be unable to move.

Are you redefining the definition of "Space-Time???

Principle II
A body or object ‘A’ in motion as viewed from an observers inertial frame of reference ’B’ cannot have a velocity faster than the radius of Space-Time that body or object ‘A’ generates.

If you view "Space-Time" as an entity of the universe, then quantity equals density and you can say that objects move though equal quantities of "Space-Time", "Quantum Foam", "Space", "Aether"; or whatever term you prefer, for any given increment of real time one wishes to use".

Principle III
When a body or object ‘A’ is in motion as viewed from an observer’s inertial frame of reference ‘B’, the volume of Space-Time body or object ‘A’ generates, slows, according to the relative velocity of the body or object ‘A’ as viewed from the observer’s inertial frame of reference ‘B’.

The density of space-time increases as the quantity of uniform motion increases. "Greater mass"

Principle IV
The rate at which Space-Time is generated from every body or object at rest is dependant on the mass and density radius of that object or body.

Objects do not generate "Space-Time". This is like saying gravity is a property of matter. Good idea but not properly applied.

[Guille]

why do you think gravity isn't a porperty of matter? I think it is. no??

[dleviwing]

Guille;
What is your definition of MATTER? I refer to matter as the only physical substance of the universe. As such gravity is an INTERACTION OF MATTER in different states of structure and motion.
When science has been unable to determine a real cause an effect to a phenomena, it seems all right to create a new attribute for matter. This is a bad habit of QM and String Theory also.

Are you really only going on 15?

Best regards;
Dave

[Guille]

What does space-time mean/is in your definition of matter and gravity? it all depends on that.

To your question, yes, I'm only 14.10 (out of 12:months) years old.

[dleviwing]

Guille;
This is Tony's thread on Space-Time. Read his website and make your own evaluation for him. He has done a great deal of homework to create his site and I think you may find some of his views interesting.
You may find my thread under "Brainstorming" "Time, Space, Matter, Motion". Having an open mind, you should be careful who you allow to fill it.

Best regards;
Dave

[Tony Stanton]

No thanks Dave, Space-Time is the perfect term used to describe our 4D Universe
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(((Are you redefining the definition of "Space-Time???)))

No, I am just defining how bodies or objects are able to move by generating Space-Time around themselves.


(((If you view "Space-Time" as an entity of the universe, then quantity equals density and you can say that objects move though equal quantities of "Space-Time", "Quantum Foam", "Space", "Aether"; or whatever term you prefer, for any given increment of real time one wishes to use".)))

No, because a body or object would be unable to move if it did not generates Space-Time around itself. The rate of the generated Space-Time is what governs the body or objects velocity and the volume of Space-Time generated by each object or body is dependant on the relative velocity and mass of that object or body.



(((The density of space-time increases as the quantity of uniform motion increases. "Greater mass")))

No. The density of Space-Time generated by a mass-less particle is greater than that generated by a body or object with mass, such as our sun. The greater your mass, the less Space-Time you generate.


(((Objects do not generate "Space-Time". This is like saying gravity is a property of matter. Good idea but not properly applied.)))

I totally disagree with you. How do you know that objects do not generate Space-Time, it has to come from somewhere and to me it is obvious that matter generates Space-Time. This generation of Space-Time is dependant on matter's relative velocity and its mass. Yes, I also think it is a good idea but I'm sorry, I know this idea is properly applied. If you doubt it then build a Space-Time engine for yourself or at least read the consequences page.


Gravity is a property of the generation of Space-Time by all matter, the rate of Space-Time generated by a body or object with mass is the effect we 'feel' as gravity.

[Guille]

tony,

don't you think that matter is in or occupies space-time? how cna then matter create something it's under influence of?

[Tony Stanton]

Every object in this Universe occupies some of the Space-Time generated by other objects and I have replied to these threads in more detail on my website www.theoryofspacetime.co.uk on the discussion page.

[Guille]

Every object in this Universe occupies some of the Space-Time generated by other objects and I have replied to these threads in more detail on my website www.theoryofspacetime.co.uk on the discussion page.

this is sort of paradoxical.

spacetime then, has no difference to matter/mass.