http://geocities.com/mileswmathis/string.html
Regards
-RP
http://geocities.com/mileswmathis/string.html
Regards
-RP
(George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.
"All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
"Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
"Particles give me a headache." - Ibid
A nice review on the spacetime wonderland built by string theory.
In my humble opinion, it is doubtful whether spacetime believers are really physics-minded or not.
After Minkowski postulated time as the 4th dimension and developed the spacetime worldview rather than the space-and-time physical view, modern physics became subordinated and surrendered itself to modern mathematics.
It is really ironic that when some physics-minded people want to protect physics with the space-and-time foundation, those mainstreamers in education institutes accuse them as "challenging the foundation of physics". Actually, those noble post-newtonian theorists are protecting the foundation of physics from suborination to biased applications of theoretical mathematics to build unrealistic wonderlands that can only be interpreted with modern mathematics.
Best Regards. Bottomlander
I think I started laughing when the author insisted you couldn't differentiate by anything other than time.
Sure, string theory could be the modern equivalent of alchemy - a dangerous combination of wishful thinking and groupthink - but it isn't because some dimensions may be of time, not space.
The walking and moving sidewalk analogy doesn't make sense either.
I don’t think JPL has indulged near as much as Dr. Brian Greene or Kuku Kacu in self aggrandizement!![]()
David![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)