Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59
    I think Einstein would have considered Brian Greene an intellectual moron.


  2. #12
    Blue Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    107
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    29

    Post

    I think Brian Greene has some interesting ways of explaining things, but he can't see the wood for the trees. String theory is actually a theory of how we visualise things rather than a theory of physics. Obviously, because we visualise physical objects it would be easy to assume that String Theory was a physical theory, but alas it isn't.... not until it proves that string exist.


    DG

  3. #13
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59
    DG;
    I agree, but you are being too kind. String theory is the "Rap music of science".


  4. #14
    Blue Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    107
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    29

    Cool

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!

    I think it is just the crossroads where science, philosophy and mathematics meets. I think once a breakthrough has been made in Quantu8m Gravity, then String Theory will become readily more accepted as a science rather than a purely philosophical pursuit.




    DG

  5. #15
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    292
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing
    I think Einstein would have considered Brian Greene an intellectual moron.

    Perhaps. However, Brian's book is a beautiful attempt to simplify complex theories and to explain the nature of the cosmos in a way that is accessible to a broad audiance. That of course means dumbing down a lot of coveted information and may have lead to resentment from the scientific elite. I have never experienced as much hostility to outside observers as this field seem to have. There are many people out there that know for sure, that have all the answers and have closed their ears to fresh input, even if it is from untrained laymen. I am just stating my impressions of what I have read on chat rooms about his books, and yes, I actually liked it
    String theory seems to have hit a plateu, I agree and quantum loop appear to be more promissing at this point, however, one never knows what comes next.

  6. #16
    Blue Belt
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    107
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    29

    Cool

    I am inclined to agree with Mr Nobody on this point. If it weren't for BG's quite amazing ability to contextualise String Theory into a format that is broadly understandable by those who have no academic physics background, then I would certainly be struggling to understand alot more of the contexts than I do now. The Elegant Universe (Greene's excellent book) is a must read for everyone interested in String Theory, irrespective of whether you think String Theory is a philosophy, a branch of physics, a load of rubbish or whatever.



    DG

  7. #17
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59
    DG;
    I'm sure Mr. Greene means well and thinks he is educating the masses each time he deposits his royalty checks.


  8. #18
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Brian Greene is a good scientific writter. Imagen, he is actually capable of making hundred thousands of people believe that there is a theory that is going perfectly well and that is just, just about to be completed and explain everything in the universe... He convinced myself. He is good simplyfying. I would like to discuss with him several points of string theory, if we manage to have him in a chat.

    But I also think that string theory, and so, Brian Greene, and so, the elegant universe, are WRONG. I personally don't think about what Einstein would think about someone, not really, I don't think about what anybody would think about someone. But brian greene has a great head, he is an amazing mathematician, but since mathematicians entered physics, I think that this science has gone downwards, because it's not so much about numbers, it's beocme a brach of math nearly.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top